Seeing Versus Doing

How Businesses Manage Tensions in Pursuit of Sustainability

Jay Joseph, Helen Borland, Marc Orlitzky, Adam Lindgreen

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Management of organizational tensions can facilitate the simultaneous advancement of economic, social, and environmental priorities. The approach is based on managers identifying and managing tensions between the three priorities, by employing one of the three strategic responses. Although recent work has provided a theoretical basis for such tension acknowledgment and management, there is a dearth of empirical studies. We interviewed 32 corporate sustainability managers across 25 forestry and wood-products organizations in Australia. Study participants were divided into two groups: (1) those considered effective at corporate sustainability and (2) a status-quo group. Contrary to current theory, our findings showed that acknowledgment of organizational tensions was widespread in the Australian forestry and wood-products industry and not limited to those managers who are effective at managing corporate sustainability. What differed was the degree to which managers did something about the perceived tensions—with the effective group more consistently acting to manage and resolve paradoxical scenarios. Our findings suggest that existing theoretical constructs of tension management may not adequately capture the individual-level complexity involved with managing tensions in practice.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Business Ethics
Antal sider22
ISSN0167-4544
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 29 nov. 2018

Bibliografisk note

Epub ahead of print. Published online: 29. November 2018

Emneord

  • Corporate sustainability
  • Integrative view
  • Paradox
  • Resolution
  • Separation strategy
  • Synthesis strategy
  • Tension management

Citer dette

@article{fa35b0860f4948a8b76971fecd3bd2d5,
title = "Seeing Versus Doing: How Businesses Manage Tensions in Pursuit of Sustainability",
abstract = "Management of organizational tensions can facilitate the simultaneous advancement of economic, social, and environmental priorities. The approach is based on managers identifying and managing tensions between the three priorities, by employing one of the three strategic responses. Although recent work has provided a theoretical basis for such tension acknowledgment and management, there is a dearth of empirical studies. We interviewed 32 corporate sustainability managers across 25 forestry and wood-products organizations in Australia. Study participants were divided into two groups: (1) those considered effective at corporate sustainability and (2) a status-quo group. Contrary to current theory, our findings showed that acknowledgment of organizational tensions was widespread in the Australian forestry and wood-products industry and not limited to those managers who are effective at managing corporate sustainability. What differed was the degree to which managers did something about the perceived tensions—with the effective group more consistently acting to manage and resolve paradoxical scenarios. Our findings suggest that existing theoretical constructs of tension management may not adequately capture the individual-level complexity involved with managing tensions in practice.",
keywords = "Corporate sustainability, Integrative view, Paradox, Resolution, Separation strategy, Synthesis strategy, Tension management, Corporate sustainability, Integrative view, Paradox, Resolution, Separation strategy, Synthesis strategy, Tension management",
author = "Jay Joseph and Helen Borland and Marc Orlitzky and Adam Lindgreen",
note = "Epub ahead of print. Published online: 29. November 2018",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1007/s10551-018-4065-1",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Business Ethics",
issn = "0167-4544",
publisher = "Springer",

}

Seeing Versus Doing : How Businesses Manage Tensions in Pursuit of Sustainability. / Joseph, Jay; Borland, Helen; Orlitzky, Marc; Lindgreen, Adam.

I: Journal of Business Ethics, 29.11.2018.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Seeing Versus Doing

T2 - How Businesses Manage Tensions in Pursuit of Sustainability

AU - Joseph, Jay

AU - Borland, Helen

AU - Orlitzky, Marc

AU - Lindgreen, Adam

N1 - Epub ahead of print. Published online: 29. November 2018

PY - 2018/11/29

Y1 - 2018/11/29

N2 - Management of organizational tensions can facilitate the simultaneous advancement of economic, social, and environmental priorities. The approach is based on managers identifying and managing tensions between the three priorities, by employing one of the three strategic responses. Although recent work has provided a theoretical basis for such tension acknowledgment and management, there is a dearth of empirical studies. We interviewed 32 corporate sustainability managers across 25 forestry and wood-products organizations in Australia. Study participants were divided into two groups: (1) those considered effective at corporate sustainability and (2) a status-quo group. Contrary to current theory, our findings showed that acknowledgment of organizational tensions was widespread in the Australian forestry and wood-products industry and not limited to those managers who are effective at managing corporate sustainability. What differed was the degree to which managers did something about the perceived tensions—with the effective group more consistently acting to manage and resolve paradoxical scenarios. Our findings suggest that existing theoretical constructs of tension management may not adequately capture the individual-level complexity involved with managing tensions in practice.

AB - Management of organizational tensions can facilitate the simultaneous advancement of economic, social, and environmental priorities. The approach is based on managers identifying and managing tensions between the three priorities, by employing one of the three strategic responses. Although recent work has provided a theoretical basis for such tension acknowledgment and management, there is a dearth of empirical studies. We interviewed 32 corporate sustainability managers across 25 forestry and wood-products organizations in Australia. Study participants were divided into two groups: (1) those considered effective at corporate sustainability and (2) a status-quo group. Contrary to current theory, our findings showed that acknowledgment of organizational tensions was widespread in the Australian forestry and wood-products industry and not limited to those managers who are effective at managing corporate sustainability. What differed was the degree to which managers did something about the perceived tensions—with the effective group more consistently acting to manage and resolve paradoxical scenarios. Our findings suggest that existing theoretical constructs of tension management may not adequately capture the individual-level complexity involved with managing tensions in practice.

KW - Corporate sustainability

KW - Integrative view

KW - Paradox

KW - Resolution

KW - Separation strategy

KW - Synthesis strategy

KW - Tension management

KW - Corporate sustainability

KW - Integrative view

KW - Paradox

KW - Resolution

KW - Separation strategy

KW - Synthesis strategy

KW - Tension management

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921376712&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1007/s10551-018-4065-1

DO - 10.1007/s10551-018-4065-1

M3 - Journal article

JO - Journal of Business Ethics

JF - Journal of Business Ethics

SN - 0167-4544

ER -