Sekundärinsolvenzverfahren nach der Europäischen Insolvenzverordnung: Niederlassungsbegriff und forum shopping

Georg Ringe

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Abstrakt

The German Federal Supreme Court held in a recent decision that secondary proceedings according to Article 3(2) of the European Insolvency Regulation cannot be initiated where the debtor only has assets in a particular country. The requirements for an “establishment” go beyond this and require an economic activity with a “minimum of organisation and certain stability”. This decision stands in conformity with the leading academic comment and other case-law. Nevertheless, the decision is a good opportunity to stress the importance of secondary proceedings and their function to protect local creditors. This is particularly true where the secondary proceedings are initiated (as here) in the context of a cross-border transfer of the “centre of main interests” (COMI) of the debtor. The ongoing review of the European Insolvency Regulation should respond to this problem in one of the regulatory options provided.
Bidragets oversatte titelSecondary proceedings, forum shopping and the European Insolvency Regulation
OriginalsprogTysk
TidsskriftI P Rax - Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts
Vol/bind4
Sider (fra-til)330-332
ISSN0720-6585
StatusUdgivet - 2013

Bibliografisk note

CBS Bibliotek har ikke adgang til materialet

Citationsformater