Science or Science Fiction? Professionals’ Discursive Construction of Climate Change

Lianne M. Lefsrud, Renate Meyer

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

This paper examines the framings and identity work associated with professionals’ discursive construction of climate change science, their legitimation of themselves as experts on ‘the truth’, and their attitudes towards regulatory measures. Drawing from survey responses of 1077 professional engineers and geoscientists, we reconstruct their framings of the issue and knowledge claims to position themselves within their organizational and their professional institutions. In understanding the struggle over what constitutes and legitimizes expertise, we make apparent the heterogeneity of claims, legitimation strategies, and use of emotionality and metaphor. By linking notions of the science or science fiction of climate change to the assessment of the adequacy of global and local policies and of potential organizational responses, we contribute to the understanding of ‘defensive institutional work’ by professionals within petroleum companies, related industries, government regulators, and their professional association.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftOrganization Studies
Vol/bind33
Udgave nummer11
Sider (fra-til)1477-1506
ISSN0170-8406
DOI
StatusUdgivet - nov. 2012

Emneord

  • Climate change
  • Defensive institutional work
  • Emotion
  • Expertise
  • Framing
  • Metaphor
  • Petroleum industry

Citer dette

@article{3a045b8abfed4f2eb3e8fd44c8cc4ade,
title = "Science or Science Fiction?: Professionals’ Discursive Construction of Climate Change",
abstract = "This paper examines the framings and identity work associated with professionals’ discursive construction of climate change science, their legitimation of themselves as experts on ‘the truth’, and their attitudes towards regulatory measures. Drawing from survey responses of 1077 professional engineers and geoscientists, we reconstruct their framings of the issue and knowledge claims to position themselves within their organizational and their professional institutions. In understanding the struggle over what constitutes and legitimizes expertise, we make apparent the heterogeneity of claims, legitimation strategies, and use of emotionality and metaphor. By linking notions of the science or science fiction of climate change to the assessment of the adequacy of global and local policies and of potential organizational responses, we contribute to the understanding of ‘defensive institutional work’ by professionals within petroleum companies, related industries, government regulators, and their professional association.",
keywords = "Climate change, Defensive institutional work, Emotion, Expertise, Framing, Metaphor, Petroleum industry",
author = "Lefsrud, {Lianne M.} and Renate Meyer",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1177/0170840612463317",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "1477--1506",
journal = "Organization Studies",
issn = "0170-8406",
publisher = "Sage Publications Ltd.",
number = "11",

}

Science or Science Fiction? Professionals’ Discursive Construction of Climate Change . / Lefsrud, Lianne M.; Meyer, Renate.

I: Organization Studies, Bind 33, Nr. 11, 11.2012, s. 1477-1506 .

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Science or Science Fiction?

T2 - Professionals’ Discursive Construction of Climate Change

AU - Lefsrud, Lianne M.

AU - Meyer, Renate

PY - 2012/11

Y1 - 2012/11

N2 - This paper examines the framings and identity work associated with professionals’ discursive construction of climate change science, their legitimation of themselves as experts on ‘the truth’, and their attitudes towards regulatory measures. Drawing from survey responses of 1077 professional engineers and geoscientists, we reconstruct their framings of the issue and knowledge claims to position themselves within their organizational and their professional institutions. In understanding the struggle over what constitutes and legitimizes expertise, we make apparent the heterogeneity of claims, legitimation strategies, and use of emotionality and metaphor. By linking notions of the science or science fiction of climate change to the assessment of the adequacy of global and local policies and of potential organizational responses, we contribute to the understanding of ‘defensive institutional work’ by professionals within petroleum companies, related industries, government regulators, and their professional association.

AB - This paper examines the framings and identity work associated with professionals’ discursive construction of climate change science, their legitimation of themselves as experts on ‘the truth’, and their attitudes towards regulatory measures. Drawing from survey responses of 1077 professional engineers and geoscientists, we reconstruct their framings of the issue and knowledge claims to position themselves within their organizational and their professional institutions. In understanding the struggle over what constitutes and legitimizes expertise, we make apparent the heterogeneity of claims, legitimation strategies, and use of emotionality and metaphor. By linking notions of the science or science fiction of climate change to the assessment of the adequacy of global and local policies and of potential organizational responses, we contribute to the understanding of ‘defensive institutional work’ by professionals within petroleum companies, related industries, government regulators, and their professional association.

KW - Climate change

KW - Defensive institutional work

KW - Emotion

KW - Expertise

KW - Framing

KW - Metaphor

KW - Petroleum industry

U2 - 10.1177/0170840612463317

DO - 10.1177/0170840612463317

M3 - Journal article

VL - 33

SP - 1477

EP - 1506

JO - Organization Studies

JF - Organization Studies

SN - 0170-8406

IS - 11

ER -