Risk Management and Uncertainty in Large Complex Public Projects: What Roles for Knowledge and Public Accountancy?

Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskningpeer review

Resumé

Governmental actors worldwide are promoting risk management as a rational approach to man-age uncertainty and improve the abilities to deliver large complex projects according to budget, time plans, and pre-set project specifications: But what do we know about the effects of risk management on the abilities to meet such objectives? Using Callon’s (1998) twin notions of framing and overflowing we examine the implementation of risk management within the Dan-ish public sector and the effects this generated for the management of two large complex pro-jects. We show how the rational framing of risk management have generated unexpected costly outcomes such as: the undermining of the longer-term value and societal relevance of the built asset, the negligence of the wider range of uncertainties emerging during project processes, and constraining forms of knowledge. We also show how expert accountants play a complex and unexpected role. As they implement a rational approach to risk management to manage uncer-tainty, the accounting experts simultaneously co-produce the costly overflows that challenge the successful completion of the projects, i.e. they actively produce new uncertainty.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Publikationsdato2017
Antal sider58
StatusUdgivet - 2017
Begivenhed2017 Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference - Université Laval, Québec, Canada
Varighed: 2 jul. 20175 jul. 2017
http://www4.fsa.ulaval.ca/en/evenements/2017-critical-perspectives-on-accounting-conference/

Konference

Konference2017 Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference
LokationUniversité Laval
LandCanada
ByQuébec
Periode02/07/201705/07/2017
Internetadresse

Bibliografisk note

CBS Bibliotek har ikke adgang til materialet

Emneord

  • Risk management
  • Public sector accountancy
  • Knowledge
  • Case studies

Citer dette

Neerup Themsen, T., Harty, C., & Tryggestad, K. (2017). Risk Management and Uncertainty in Large Complex Public Projects: What Roles for Knowledge and Public Accountancy?. Afhandling præsenteret på 2017 Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference, Québec, Canada.
Neerup Themsen, Tim ; Harty, Chris ; Tryggestad, Kjell. / Risk Management and Uncertainty in Large Complex Public Projects : What Roles for Knowledge and Public Accountancy?. Afhandling præsenteret på 2017 Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference, Québec, Canada.58 s.
@conference{6a55ae803b1b4f50bf7dbc018deb3bb8,
title = "Risk Management and Uncertainty in Large Complex Public Projects: What Roles for Knowledge and Public Accountancy?",
abstract = "Governmental actors worldwide are promoting risk management as a rational approach to man-age uncertainty and improve the abilities to deliver large complex projects according to budget, time plans, and pre-set project specifications: But what do we know about the effects of risk management on the abilities to meet such objectives? Using Callon’s (1998) twin notions of framing and overflowing we examine the implementation of risk management within the Dan-ish public sector and the effects this generated for the management of two large complex pro-jects. We show how the rational framing of risk management have generated unexpected costly outcomes such as: the undermining of the longer-term value and societal relevance of the built asset, the negligence of the wider range of uncertainties emerging during project processes, and constraining forms of knowledge. We also show how expert accountants play a complex and unexpected role. As they implement a rational approach to risk management to manage uncer-tainty, the accounting experts simultaneously co-produce the costly overflows that challenge the successful completion of the projects, i.e. they actively produce new uncertainty.",
keywords = "Risk management, Public sector accountancy, Knowledge, Case studies, Risk management, Public sector accountancy, Knowledge, Case studies",
author = "{Neerup Themsen}, Tim and Chris Harty and Kjell Tryggestad",
note = "CBS Library does not have access to the material; null ; Conference date: 02-07-2017 Through 05-07-2017",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
url = "http://www4.fsa.ulaval.ca/en/evenements/2017-critical-perspectives-on-accounting-conference/",

}

Neerup Themsen, T, Harty, C & Tryggestad, K 2017, 'Risk Management and Uncertainty in Large Complex Public Projects: What Roles for Knowledge and Public Accountancy?' Paper fremlagt ved 2017 Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference, Québec, Canada, 02/07/2017 - 05/07/2017, .

Risk Management and Uncertainty in Large Complex Public Projects : What Roles for Knowledge and Public Accountancy? / Neerup Themsen, Tim ; Harty, Chris; Tryggestad, Kjell.

2017. Afhandling præsenteret på 2017 Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference, Québec, Canada.

Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskningpeer review

TY - CONF

T1 - Risk Management and Uncertainty in Large Complex Public Projects

T2 - What Roles for Knowledge and Public Accountancy?

AU - Neerup Themsen, Tim

AU - Harty, Chris

AU - Tryggestad, Kjell

N1 - CBS Library does not have access to the material

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Governmental actors worldwide are promoting risk management as a rational approach to man-age uncertainty and improve the abilities to deliver large complex projects according to budget, time plans, and pre-set project specifications: But what do we know about the effects of risk management on the abilities to meet such objectives? Using Callon’s (1998) twin notions of framing and overflowing we examine the implementation of risk management within the Dan-ish public sector and the effects this generated for the management of two large complex pro-jects. We show how the rational framing of risk management have generated unexpected costly outcomes such as: the undermining of the longer-term value and societal relevance of the built asset, the negligence of the wider range of uncertainties emerging during project processes, and constraining forms of knowledge. We also show how expert accountants play a complex and unexpected role. As they implement a rational approach to risk management to manage uncer-tainty, the accounting experts simultaneously co-produce the costly overflows that challenge the successful completion of the projects, i.e. they actively produce new uncertainty.

AB - Governmental actors worldwide are promoting risk management as a rational approach to man-age uncertainty and improve the abilities to deliver large complex projects according to budget, time plans, and pre-set project specifications: But what do we know about the effects of risk management on the abilities to meet such objectives? Using Callon’s (1998) twin notions of framing and overflowing we examine the implementation of risk management within the Dan-ish public sector and the effects this generated for the management of two large complex pro-jects. We show how the rational framing of risk management have generated unexpected costly outcomes such as: the undermining of the longer-term value and societal relevance of the built asset, the negligence of the wider range of uncertainties emerging during project processes, and constraining forms of knowledge. We also show how expert accountants play a complex and unexpected role. As they implement a rational approach to risk management to manage uncer-tainty, the accounting experts simultaneously co-produce the costly overflows that challenge the successful completion of the projects, i.e. they actively produce new uncertainty.

KW - Risk management

KW - Public sector accountancy

KW - Knowledge

KW - Case studies

KW - Risk management

KW - Public sector accountancy

KW - Knowledge

KW - Case studies

M3 - Paper

ER -

Neerup Themsen T, Harty C, Tryggestad K. Risk Management and Uncertainty in Large Complex Public Projects: What Roles for Knowledge and Public Accountancy?. 2017. Afhandling præsenteret på 2017 Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference, Québec, Canada.