Risk Management and Insurance Decisions under Ambiguity

Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskningpeer review

Resumé

I study the impact of ambiguity on insurance decisions and the optimality of insurance contracts. My tractable approach allows me to study the interaction between risk and ambiguity attitudes. When insurance decisions are made independently of other assets, for a given increase in wealth, both risk and ambiguity attitudes interact in nontrivial ways to determine the change of coinsurance demand. I derive sufficient conditions to guarantee that the optimal coinsurance demand is decreasing in wealth. When a non-traded asset is introduced, my model predicts behavior that is inconsistent with the classical portfolio theory that assumes Subjective Expected Utility theory; however, it provides hints to a possible solution of the under-diversification puzzle of households. I also identify conditions under which more risk or ambiguity aversion decreases the demand for coinsurance. Additionally, I show a counterexample to a classical result in insurance economics where an insurance contract with straight deductible is dominated by a coinsurance contract. Finally, I find that a modified Borch rule characterizes the optimal insurance contract with bilateral risk and ambiguity
attitudes and heterogeneity in beliefs.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Publikationsdato2012
Antal sider54
StatusUdgivet - 2012
BegivenhedCEAR/MRIC Behavioral Insurance Workshop 2012 - Carl Friedrich von Siemens Stiftung, München, Tyskland
Varighed: 10 dec. 201211 dec. 2012
http://www.mric.uni-muenchen.de/events/behav_ins12/programm.pdf

Workshop

WorkshopCEAR/MRIC Behavioral Insurance Workshop 2012
LokationCarl Friedrich von Siemens Stiftung
LandTyskland
ByMünchen
Periode10/12/201211/12/2012
Internetadresse

Citer dette

Martínez-Correa, J. (2012). Risk Management and Insurance Decisions under Ambiguity. Afhandling præsenteret på CEAR/MRIC Behavioral Insurance Workshop 2012, München, Tyskland.
Martínez-Correa, Jimmy. / Risk Management and Insurance Decisions under Ambiguity. Afhandling præsenteret på CEAR/MRIC Behavioral Insurance Workshop 2012, München, Tyskland.54 s.
@conference{759924f80fa246cb9545b60cdef32322,
title = "Risk Management and Insurance Decisions under Ambiguity",
abstract = "I study the impact of ambiguity on insurance decisions and the optimality of insurance contracts. My tractable approach allows me to study the interaction between risk and ambiguity attitudes. When insurance decisions are made independently of other assets, for a given increase in wealth, both risk and ambiguity attitudes interact in nontrivial ways to determine the change of coinsurance demand. I derive sufficient conditions to guarantee that the optimal coinsurance demand is decreasing in wealth. When a non-traded asset is introduced, my model predicts behavior that is inconsistent with the classical portfolio theory that assumes Subjective Expected Utility theory; however, it provides hints to a possible solution of the under-diversification puzzle of households. I also identify conditions under which more risk or ambiguity aversion decreases the demand for coinsurance. Additionally, I show a counterexample to a classical result in insurance economics where an insurance contract with straight deductible is dominated by a coinsurance contract. Finally, I find that a modified Borch rule characterizes the optimal insurance contract with bilateral risk and ambiguityattitudes and heterogeneity in beliefs.",
author = "Jimmy Mart{\'i}nez-Correa",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
note = "null ; Conference date: 10-12-2012 Through 11-12-2012",
url = "http://www.mric.uni-muenchen.de/events/behav_ins12/programm.pdf",

}

Martínez-Correa, J 2012, 'Risk Management and Insurance Decisions under Ambiguity' Paper fremlagt ved CEAR/MRIC Behavioral Insurance Workshop 2012, München, Tyskland, 10/12/2012 - 11/12/2012, .

Risk Management and Insurance Decisions under Ambiguity. / Martínez-Correa, Jimmy.

2012. Afhandling præsenteret på CEAR/MRIC Behavioral Insurance Workshop 2012, München, Tyskland.

Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskningpeer review

TY - CONF

T1 - Risk Management and Insurance Decisions under Ambiguity

AU - Martínez-Correa, Jimmy

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - I study the impact of ambiguity on insurance decisions and the optimality of insurance contracts. My tractable approach allows me to study the interaction between risk and ambiguity attitudes. When insurance decisions are made independently of other assets, for a given increase in wealth, both risk and ambiguity attitudes interact in nontrivial ways to determine the change of coinsurance demand. I derive sufficient conditions to guarantee that the optimal coinsurance demand is decreasing in wealth. When a non-traded asset is introduced, my model predicts behavior that is inconsistent with the classical portfolio theory that assumes Subjective Expected Utility theory; however, it provides hints to a possible solution of the under-diversification puzzle of households. I also identify conditions under which more risk or ambiguity aversion decreases the demand for coinsurance. Additionally, I show a counterexample to a classical result in insurance economics where an insurance contract with straight deductible is dominated by a coinsurance contract. Finally, I find that a modified Borch rule characterizes the optimal insurance contract with bilateral risk and ambiguityattitudes and heterogeneity in beliefs.

AB - I study the impact of ambiguity on insurance decisions and the optimality of insurance contracts. My tractable approach allows me to study the interaction between risk and ambiguity attitudes. When insurance decisions are made independently of other assets, for a given increase in wealth, both risk and ambiguity attitudes interact in nontrivial ways to determine the change of coinsurance demand. I derive sufficient conditions to guarantee that the optimal coinsurance demand is decreasing in wealth. When a non-traded asset is introduced, my model predicts behavior that is inconsistent with the classical portfolio theory that assumes Subjective Expected Utility theory; however, it provides hints to a possible solution of the under-diversification puzzle of households. I also identify conditions under which more risk or ambiguity aversion decreases the demand for coinsurance. Additionally, I show a counterexample to a classical result in insurance economics where an insurance contract with straight deductible is dominated by a coinsurance contract. Finally, I find that a modified Borch rule characterizes the optimal insurance contract with bilateral risk and ambiguityattitudes and heterogeneity in beliefs.

M3 - Paper

ER -

Martínez-Correa J. Risk Management and Insurance Decisions under Ambiguity. 2012. Afhandling præsenteret på CEAR/MRIC Behavioral Insurance Workshop 2012, München, Tyskland.