Reclaiming the Child Left Behind

The Case for Corporate Cultural Responsibility

François Maon, Adam Lindgreen

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Although a reasonable understanding of corporate social responsibility (CSR) exists, one dimension remains largely ignored. That is, the cultural impacts of corporations, or the bearing, at various levels of their business models, activities, and outcomes on the value systems and enduring beliefs of affected people. We introduce the notion of corporate cultural responsibility (CCR). The way corporations address CCR concerns can be reflected according to three stances: cultural destructiveness, cultural carelessness, and cultural prowess. Taken sequentially, they reflect a growing comprehension and increasingly active consideration of CCR concerns by corporations. In turn, we explicitly address issues related to the complex question of determining the cultural responsibilities of corporate actors; specify key CCR-related conceptualizations; and lay a foundation for discussions, debates, and research efforts centered on CCR concerns and rationales.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Business Ethics
Vol/bind130
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)755-766
Antal sider12
ISSN0167-4544
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2015
Udgivet eksterntJa

Emneord

  • Corporate cultural responsibility
  • Corporate social responsibility
  • Cultural carelessness
  • Cultural destructiveness
  • Cultural prowess
  • Shared values

Citer dette

@article{861d8104aa8f40f080daab059a7007e1,
title = "Reclaiming the Child Left Behind: The Case for Corporate Cultural Responsibility",
abstract = "Although a reasonable understanding of corporate social responsibility (CSR) exists, one dimension remains largely ignored. That is, the cultural impacts of corporations, or the bearing, at various levels of their business models, activities, and outcomes on the value systems and enduring beliefs of affected people. We introduce the notion of corporate cultural responsibility (CCR). The way corporations address CCR concerns can be reflected according to three stances: cultural destructiveness, cultural carelessness, and cultural prowess. Taken sequentially, they reflect a growing comprehension and increasingly active consideration of CCR concerns by corporations. In turn, we explicitly address issues related to the complex question of determining the cultural responsibilities of corporate actors; specify key CCR-related conceptualizations; and lay a foundation for discussions, debates, and research efforts centered on CCR concerns and rationales.",
keywords = "Corporate cultural responsibility, Corporate social responsibility, Cultural carelessness, Cultural destructiveness, Cultural prowess, Shared values",
author = "Fran{\cc}ois Maon and Adam Lindgreen",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1007/s10551-014-2112-0",
language = "English",
volume = "130",
pages = "755--766",
journal = "Journal of Business Ethics",
issn = "0167-4544",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "4",

}

Reclaiming the Child Left Behind : The Case for Corporate Cultural Responsibility. / Maon, François; Lindgreen, Adam.

I: Journal of Business Ethics, Bind 130, Nr. 4, 2015, s. 755-766.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reclaiming the Child Left Behind

T2 - The Case for Corporate Cultural Responsibility

AU - Maon, François

AU - Lindgreen, Adam

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Although a reasonable understanding of corporate social responsibility (CSR) exists, one dimension remains largely ignored. That is, the cultural impacts of corporations, or the bearing, at various levels of their business models, activities, and outcomes on the value systems and enduring beliefs of affected people. We introduce the notion of corporate cultural responsibility (CCR). The way corporations address CCR concerns can be reflected according to three stances: cultural destructiveness, cultural carelessness, and cultural prowess. Taken sequentially, they reflect a growing comprehension and increasingly active consideration of CCR concerns by corporations. In turn, we explicitly address issues related to the complex question of determining the cultural responsibilities of corporate actors; specify key CCR-related conceptualizations; and lay a foundation for discussions, debates, and research efforts centered on CCR concerns and rationales.

AB - Although a reasonable understanding of corporate social responsibility (CSR) exists, one dimension remains largely ignored. That is, the cultural impacts of corporations, or the bearing, at various levels of their business models, activities, and outcomes on the value systems and enduring beliefs of affected people. We introduce the notion of corporate cultural responsibility (CCR). The way corporations address CCR concerns can be reflected according to three stances: cultural destructiveness, cultural carelessness, and cultural prowess. Taken sequentially, they reflect a growing comprehension and increasingly active consideration of CCR concerns by corporations. In turn, we explicitly address issues related to the complex question of determining the cultural responsibilities of corporate actors; specify key CCR-related conceptualizations; and lay a foundation for discussions, debates, and research efforts centered on CCR concerns and rationales.

KW - Corporate cultural responsibility

KW - Corporate social responsibility

KW - Cultural carelessness

KW - Cultural destructiveness

KW - Cultural prowess

KW - Shared values

UR - http://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921376712

U2 - 10.1007/s10551-014-2112-0

DO - 10.1007/s10551-014-2112-0

M3 - Journal article

VL - 130

SP - 755

EP - 766

JO - Journal of Business Ethics

JF - Journal of Business Ethics

SN - 0167-4544

IS - 4

ER -