Re-making 'Quality' within the Social Sciences: The Debate over Rigour and Relevance in the Modern Business School

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Against the background of previous discussions over the state of academic institutions and the specific operation of research evaluation and measurement systems, this article focuses on the relationship between academic quality and larger societal value within social scientific research. Adopting a perspective from Science and Technology Studies (STS), it specifically explores what has become known as the ‘rigour–relevance’ debate within business and management research and considers its larger implications. On the one hand, it is important to consider how terms such as ‘rigour’ and ‘relevance’ are specifically constructed and performed. On the other, this debate should be seen in the context of the modern business school as an ‘overloaded assemblage’ responsible to multiple audiences and for multiple purposes. In conclusion, it is argued that frameworks of ‘rigour’ and ‘relevance’ should be considered in terms not only of what they include but also omit – with notions of responsibility, public value, cognitive justice and public engagement providing alternative, but characteristically neglected, means of (re-)framing quality in this context.
Against the background of previous discussions over the state of academic institutions and the specific operation of research evaluation and measurement systems, this article focuses on the relationship between academic quality and larger societal value within social scientific research. Adopting a perspective from Science and Technology Studies (STS), it specifically explores what has become known as the ‘rigour–relevance’ debate within business and management research and considers its larger implications. On the one hand, it is important to consider how terms such as ‘rigour’ and ‘relevance’ are specifically constructed and performed. On the other, this debate should be seen in the context of the modern business school as an ‘overloaded assemblage’ responsible to multiple audiences and for multiple purposes. In conclusion, it is argued that frameworks of ‘rigour’ and ‘relevance’ should be considered in terms not only of what they include but also omit – with notions of responsibility, public value, cognitive justice and public engagement providing alternative, but characteristically neglected, means of (re-)framing quality in this context.
SprogEngelsk
TidsskriftThe Sociological Review
Vol/bind67
Udgave nummer1
Sider194–209
Antal sider16
ISSN0038-0261
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2019

Emneord

  • Audit culture
  • Knowledge production
  • Public value
  • Research evaluation
  • Science and Technology Studies (STS)

Citer dette

@article{a9ad08d54c61422983bae1f34a9b81d0,
title = "Re-making 'Quality' within the Social Sciences: The Debate over Rigour and Relevance in the Modern Business School",
abstract = "Against the background of previous discussions over the state of academic institutions and the specific operation of research evaluation and measurement systems, this article focuses on the relationship between academic quality and larger societal value within social scientific research. Adopting a perspective from Science and Technology Studies (STS), it specifically explores what has become known as the ‘rigour–relevance’ debate within business and management research and considers its larger implications. On the one hand, it is important to consider how terms such as ‘rigour’ and ‘relevance’ are specifically constructed and performed. On the other, this debate should be seen in the context of the modern business school as an ‘overloaded assemblage’ responsible to multiple audiences and for multiple purposes. In conclusion, it is argued that frameworks of ‘rigour’ and ‘relevance’ should be considered in terms not only of what they include but also omit – with notions of responsibility, public value, cognitive justice and public engagement providing alternative, but characteristically neglected, means of (re-)framing quality in this context.",
keywords = "Audit culture, Knowledge production, Public value, Research evaluation, Science and Technology Studies (STS), Audit culture, Knowledge production, Public value, Research evaluation, Science and Technology Studies (STS)",
author = "Alan Irwin",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1177/0038026118782403",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "194–209",
journal = "Sociological Review",
issn = "0038-0261",
publisher = "Sage Journals",
number = "1",

}

Re-making 'Quality' within the Social Sciences : The Debate over Rigour and Relevance in the Modern Business School. / Irwin, Alan.

I: The Sociological Review, Bind 67, Nr. 1, 2019, s. 194–209.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Re-making 'Quality' within the Social Sciences

T2 - Sociological Review

AU - Irwin,Alan

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Against the background of previous discussions over the state of academic institutions and the specific operation of research evaluation and measurement systems, this article focuses on the relationship between academic quality and larger societal value within social scientific research. Adopting a perspective from Science and Technology Studies (STS), it specifically explores what has become known as the ‘rigour–relevance’ debate within business and management research and considers its larger implications. On the one hand, it is important to consider how terms such as ‘rigour’ and ‘relevance’ are specifically constructed and performed. On the other, this debate should be seen in the context of the modern business school as an ‘overloaded assemblage’ responsible to multiple audiences and for multiple purposes. In conclusion, it is argued that frameworks of ‘rigour’ and ‘relevance’ should be considered in terms not only of what they include but also omit – with notions of responsibility, public value, cognitive justice and public engagement providing alternative, but characteristically neglected, means of (re-)framing quality in this context.

AB - Against the background of previous discussions over the state of academic institutions and the specific operation of research evaluation and measurement systems, this article focuses on the relationship between academic quality and larger societal value within social scientific research. Adopting a perspective from Science and Technology Studies (STS), it specifically explores what has become known as the ‘rigour–relevance’ debate within business and management research and considers its larger implications. On the one hand, it is important to consider how terms such as ‘rigour’ and ‘relevance’ are specifically constructed and performed. On the other, this debate should be seen in the context of the modern business school as an ‘overloaded assemblage’ responsible to multiple audiences and for multiple purposes. In conclusion, it is argued that frameworks of ‘rigour’ and ‘relevance’ should be considered in terms not only of what they include but also omit – with notions of responsibility, public value, cognitive justice and public engagement providing alternative, but characteristically neglected, means of (re-)framing quality in this context.

KW - Audit culture

KW - Knowledge production

KW - Public value

KW - Research evaluation

KW - Science and Technology Studies (STS)

KW - Audit culture

KW - Knowledge production

KW - Public value

KW - Research evaluation

KW - Science and Technology Studies (STS)

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954925445685&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1177/0038026118782403

DO - 10.1177/0038026118782403

M3 - Journal article

VL - 67

SP - 194

EP - 209

JO - Sociological Review

JF - Sociological Review

SN - 0038-0261

IS - 1

ER -