Rationalising Inefficiency

Staff Utilisation in Branches of a Large Canadian Bank

Mette Asmild, Peter Bogetoft, Jens Leth Hougaard

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

In this paper we consider staffing decisions in branches of a large Canadian bank. The bank has well-developed staffing models and the branches work in a highly competitive environment. One would therefore expect limited ‘inefficiency’ in the sense of wasted resources and over-staffing. Using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) we nevertheless find considerable ‘inefficiency’ which raises the question whether this is best interpreted as waste or if the apparent inefficiency may serve other purposes. To investigate this, we invoke the theoretical framework of rational inefficiency (Bogetoft and Hougaard [8]).
A systematic pattern of slack consumption emerges, which suggests that the allocation of slack between staff groups is far from random. The slack pattern seems natural from the point of view of employee value and hierarchy and also considering employee flexibility and substitutability. For example we find relatively large over-staffing at the supervisor level which is natural given both their strong bargaining position derived from their role in the branch hierarchy and given the relative flexibility of supervisor resources.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftOmega: The International Journal of Management Science
Vol/bind41
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)80-87
ISSN0305-0483
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2013

Emneord

  • Banking
  • Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA
  • Rational inefficiency
  • Staff utilisation
  • Allocation

Citer dette

@article{583314c6477f47f6aa533e24ebac5fea,
title = "Rationalising Inefficiency: Staff Utilisation in Branches of a Large Canadian Bank",
abstract = "In this paper we consider staffing decisions in branches of a large Canadian bank. The bank has well-developed staffing models and the branches work in a highly competitive environment. One would therefore expect limited ‘inefficiency’ in the sense of wasted resources and over-staffing. Using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) we nevertheless find considerable ‘inefficiency’ which raises the question whether this is best interpreted as waste or if the apparent inefficiency may serve other purposes. To investigate this, we invoke the theoretical framework of rational inefficiency (Bogetoft and Hougaard [8]).A systematic pattern of slack consumption emerges, which suggests that the allocation of slack between staff groups is far from random. The slack pattern seems natural from the point of view of employee value and hierarchy and also considering employee flexibility and substitutability. For example we find relatively large over-staffing at the supervisor level which is natural given both their strong bargaining position derived from their role in the branch hierarchy and given the relative flexibility of supervisor resources.",
keywords = "Banking, Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA, Rational inefficiency, Staff utilisation, Allocation",
author = "Mette Asmild and Peter Bogetoft and Hougaard, {Jens Leth}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1016/j.omega.2011.01.011",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "80--87",
journal = "Omega: The International Journal of Management Science",
issn = "0305-0483",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

Rationalising Inefficiency : Staff Utilisation in Branches of a Large Canadian Bank. / Asmild, Mette; Bogetoft, Peter; Hougaard, Jens Leth.

I: Omega: The International Journal of Management Science, Bind 41, Nr. 1, 2013, s. 80-87.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rationalising Inefficiency

T2 - Staff Utilisation in Branches of a Large Canadian Bank

AU - Asmild, Mette

AU - Bogetoft, Peter

AU - Hougaard, Jens Leth

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - In this paper we consider staffing decisions in branches of a large Canadian bank. The bank has well-developed staffing models and the branches work in a highly competitive environment. One would therefore expect limited ‘inefficiency’ in the sense of wasted resources and over-staffing. Using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) we nevertheless find considerable ‘inefficiency’ which raises the question whether this is best interpreted as waste or if the apparent inefficiency may serve other purposes. To investigate this, we invoke the theoretical framework of rational inefficiency (Bogetoft and Hougaard [8]).A systematic pattern of slack consumption emerges, which suggests that the allocation of slack between staff groups is far from random. The slack pattern seems natural from the point of view of employee value and hierarchy and also considering employee flexibility and substitutability. For example we find relatively large over-staffing at the supervisor level which is natural given both their strong bargaining position derived from their role in the branch hierarchy and given the relative flexibility of supervisor resources.

AB - In this paper we consider staffing decisions in branches of a large Canadian bank. The bank has well-developed staffing models and the branches work in a highly competitive environment. One would therefore expect limited ‘inefficiency’ in the sense of wasted resources and over-staffing. Using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) we nevertheless find considerable ‘inefficiency’ which raises the question whether this is best interpreted as waste or if the apparent inefficiency may serve other purposes. To investigate this, we invoke the theoretical framework of rational inefficiency (Bogetoft and Hougaard [8]).A systematic pattern of slack consumption emerges, which suggests that the allocation of slack between staff groups is far from random. The slack pattern seems natural from the point of view of employee value and hierarchy and also considering employee flexibility and substitutability. For example we find relatively large over-staffing at the supervisor level which is natural given both their strong bargaining position derived from their role in the branch hierarchy and given the relative flexibility of supervisor resources.

KW - Banking

KW - Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA

KW - Rational inefficiency

KW - Staff utilisation

KW - Allocation

U2 - 10.1016/j.omega.2011.01.011

DO - 10.1016/j.omega.2011.01.011

M3 - Journal article

VL - 41

SP - 80

EP - 87

JO - Omega: The International Journal of Management Science

JF - Omega: The International Journal of Management Science

SN - 0305-0483

IS - 1

ER -