Purchasing Managers’ Willingness to Pay for Attributes that Constitute Sustainability

Philipp Goebel, Carsten Reuter, Richard Pibernik, Christina Sichtmann, Lydia Bals*

*Kontaktforfatter af dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Considering the increasing international division of labor, as well as stakeholders' growing awareness of sustainability, assuring that business practices are sustainable is a major challenge. Companies have to account for the fact that any misconduct at a supplier's premises may have spillover effects that reach the manufacturer or retailer. Therefore, purchasing managers have to assure that their suppliers are compliant with sustainability standards. This, however, may induce higher purchasing costs and, as a consequence, force a trade-off between (short term) economic (i.e., purchasing cost reduction) and social/environmental sustainability criteria. How purchasing managers evaluate this trade-off is particularly interesting because they often receive performance-based salaries that incentivize the reduction of purchasing costs. Our paper sheds light on this trade-off by examining how much purchasing managers are willing to pay to assure compliance along different sustainability dimensions when selecting new suppliers in a mature market setting, namely Germany. Additionally, we identify potential (individual, professional, and organization-related) factors that may impact the purchasing managers' willingness to pay (WTP), and examine their effects. Among the most surprising findings, purchasing managers on average are willing to pay a price premium for manuals that demonstrate compliance with the United Nationals Global Compact (UNGC). Furthermore, the results show that this WTP is mostly influenced (negatively) by self-enhancement (on the individual level) and/or obedience to authority (on the organizational level), but the effects of company, affiliation with the UNGC, gender, or years of experience have no influence. Moreover, the WTP is higher for the social than for the environmental dimension, and the marginal effect of accreditation on WTP depends on which combinations of dimensions are accredited.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Operations Management
Vol/bind62
Sider (fra-til)44-58
Antal sider15
ISSN0272-6963
DOI
StatusUdgivet - sep. 2018

Bibliografisk note

Published online: 8. September 2018

Emneord

  • Industrial purchasing
  • Obedience to authority
  • Supply management
  • Sustainability
  • Sustainable sourcing
  • Triple bottom line
  • Willingness to pay

Citer dette

Goebel, Philipp ; Reuter, Carsten ; Pibernik, Richard ; Sichtmann, Christina ; Bals, Lydia. / Purchasing Managers’ Willingness to Pay for Attributes that Constitute Sustainability. I: Journal of Operations Management. 2018 ; Bind 62. s. 44-58.
@article{7cc0fb82628d4ad2be7dd84aa322ccec,
title = "Purchasing Managers’ Willingness to Pay for Attributes that Constitute Sustainability",
abstract = "Considering the increasing international division of labor, as well as stakeholders’ growing awareness of sustainability, assuring that business practices are sustainable is a major challenge. Companies have to account for the fact that any misconduct at a supplier's premises may have spillover effects that reach the manufacturer or retailer. Therefore, purchasing managers have to assure that their suppliers are compliant with sustainability standards. This, however, may induce higher purchasing costs and, as a consequence, force a trade-off between (short term) economic (i.e., purchasing cost reduction) and social/environmental sustainability criteria. How purchasing managers evaluate this trade-off is particularly interesting because they often receive performance-based salaries that incentivize the reduction of purchasing costs. Our paper sheds light on this trade-off by examining how much purchasing managers are willing to pay to assure compliance along different sustainability dimensions when selecting new suppliers in a mature market setting, namely Germany. Additionally, we identify potential (individual, professional, and organization-related) factors that may impact the purchasing managers’ willingness to pay (WTP), and examine their effects. Among the most surprising findings, purchasing managers on average are willing to pay a price premium for manuals that demonstrate compliance with the United Nationals Global Compact (UNGC). Furthermore, the results show that this WTP is mostly influenced (negatively) by self-enhancement (on the individual level) and/or obedience to authority (on the organizational level), but the effects of company, affiliation with the UNGC, gender, or years of experience have no influence. Moreover, the WTP is higher for the social than for the environmental dimension, and the marginal effect of accreditation on WTP depends on which combinations of dimensions are accredited.",
keywords = "Industrial purchasing, Obedience to authority, Supply management, Sustainability, Sustainable sourcing, Triple bottom line, Willingness to pay, Industrial purchasing, Obedience to authority, Supply management, Sustainability, Sustainable sourcing, Triple bottom line, Willingness to pay",
author = "Philipp Goebel and Carsten Reuter and Richard Pibernik and Christina Sichtmann and Lydia Bals",
note = "Published online: 8. September 2018",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.jom.2018.08.002",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "44--58",
journal = "Journal of Operations Management",
issn = "0272-6963",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Purchasing Managers’ Willingness to Pay for Attributes that Constitute Sustainability. / Goebel, Philipp; Reuter, Carsten; Pibernik, Richard; Sichtmann, Christina; Bals, Lydia.

I: Journal of Operations Management, Bind 62, 09.2018, s. 44-58.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Purchasing Managers’ Willingness to Pay for Attributes that Constitute Sustainability

AU - Goebel, Philipp

AU - Reuter, Carsten

AU - Pibernik, Richard

AU - Sichtmann, Christina

AU - Bals, Lydia

N1 - Published online: 8. September 2018

PY - 2018/9

Y1 - 2018/9

N2 - Considering the increasing international division of labor, as well as stakeholders’ growing awareness of sustainability, assuring that business practices are sustainable is a major challenge. Companies have to account for the fact that any misconduct at a supplier's premises may have spillover effects that reach the manufacturer or retailer. Therefore, purchasing managers have to assure that their suppliers are compliant with sustainability standards. This, however, may induce higher purchasing costs and, as a consequence, force a trade-off between (short term) economic (i.e., purchasing cost reduction) and social/environmental sustainability criteria. How purchasing managers evaluate this trade-off is particularly interesting because they often receive performance-based salaries that incentivize the reduction of purchasing costs. Our paper sheds light on this trade-off by examining how much purchasing managers are willing to pay to assure compliance along different sustainability dimensions when selecting new suppliers in a mature market setting, namely Germany. Additionally, we identify potential (individual, professional, and organization-related) factors that may impact the purchasing managers’ willingness to pay (WTP), and examine their effects. Among the most surprising findings, purchasing managers on average are willing to pay a price premium for manuals that demonstrate compliance with the United Nationals Global Compact (UNGC). Furthermore, the results show that this WTP is mostly influenced (negatively) by self-enhancement (on the individual level) and/or obedience to authority (on the organizational level), but the effects of company, affiliation with the UNGC, gender, or years of experience have no influence. Moreover, the WTP is higher for the social than for the environmental dimension, and the marginal effect of accreditation on WTP depends on which combinations of dimensions are accredited.

AB - Considering the increasing international division of labor, as well as stakeholders’ growing awareness of sustainability, assuring that business practices are sustainable is a major challenge. Companies have to account for the fact that any misconduct at a supplier's premises may have spillover effects that reach the manufacturer or retailer. Therefore, purchasing managers have to assure that their suppliers are compliant with sustainability standards. This, however, may induce higher purchasing costs and, as a consequence, force a trade-off between (short term) economic (i.e., purchasing cost reduction) and social/environmental sustainability criteria. How purchasing managers evaluate this trade-off is particularly interesting because they often receive performance-based salaries that incentivize the reduction of purchasing costs. Our paper sheds light on this trade-off by examining how much purchasing managers are willing to pay to assure compliance along different sustainability dimensions when selecting new suppliers in a mature market setting, namely Germany. Additionally, we identify potential (individual, professional, and organization-related) factors that may impact the purchasing managers’ willingness to pay (WTP), and examine their effects. Among the most surprising findings, purchasing managers on average are willing to pay a price premium for manuals that demonstrate compliance with the United Nationals Global Compact (UNGC). Furthermore, the results show that this WTP is mostly influenced (negatively) by self-enhancement (on the individual level) and/or obedience to authority (on the organizational level), but the effects of company, affiliation with the UNGC, gender, or years of experience have no influence. Moreover, the WTP is higher for the social than for the environmental dimension, and the marginal effect of accreditation on WTP depends on which combinations of dimensions are accredited.

KW - Industrial purchasing

KW - Obedience to authority

KW - Supply management

KW - Sustainability

KW - Sustainable sourcing

KW - Triple bottom line

KW - Willingness to pay

KW - Industrial purchasing

KW - Obedience to authority

KW - Supply management

KW - Sustainability

KW - Sustainable sourcing

KW - Triple bottom line

KW - Willingness to pay

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921385866&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1016/j.jom.2018.08.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jom.2018.08.002

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85053011706

VL - 62

SP - 44

EP - 58

JO - Journal of Operations Management

JF - Journal of Operations Management

SN - 0272-6963

ER -