Proximity and Directional Theory Compared: Taking Discriminant Positions Seriously in Multi-party Systems

Zoltán Fazekas, Zsombor Zoltán Méder

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Abstrakt

This paper tackles the problem of comparison between proximity and directional voting in 27 European multi-party systems. This is a previously unaddressed aspect of European spatial issue voting. We focus on the spatial voting theories as predictors of vote intention, evaluating the extent of proximity and directional voting. We describe the influence of identical predictions on the comparison of these theories. Our multilevel analysis of the 2009 European Election Study data shows more empirical support for proximity voting than directional voting in the countries analyzed. It does this by clearly differentiating between those cases where it is possible to compare proximity and directional voting and where this is impossible. Nevertheless, the prevalence of proximity theory decreases in more polarized party-systems.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftElectoral Studies
Vol/bind32
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)693-707
Antal sider15
ISSN0261-3794
DOI
StatusUdgivet - dec. 2013
Udgivet eksterntJa

Citationsformater