Project Studies and Engaged Scholarship: Directions Towards Contextualized and Reflexive Research on Projects

Joana Geraldi, Jonas Söderlund

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Purpose: In 2006, the “Rethinking Project Management” network called for a paradigm shift in project research, and proposed five research directions. The directions inspired research and marked a milestone in the development of the field. The purpose of this paper is to reflect on the past decade and to rejuvenate these research directions.
Design/methodology/approach: The authors propose the umbrella term: “project studies” to denote the research related to projects and temporary organizing. Project studies is conceived not only as a body of research, but also as a social process embedded in research communities, and contemporary Zeitgeist. Based on Sandberg’s interpretative approach to the fit between work and works (in this case research-researcher) and Habermas’ three types of human interests: technical, practical, and emancipatory, the authors develop a conceptual framework circumscribing three types of research in project studies.
Findings: The conceptual framework is used to craft future research directions, in the lines proposed by Winter et al. (2006b).
Research limitations/implications: The authors conclude by proposing for a sixth theme on the practice of theorizing, and call for engaged, ambidextrous scholars, who’s “job” goes beyond the writing of articles and research applications, and includes shaping discourses of project research, nurturing new project scholars, contributing to project practice and carefully considering the legacy of projects and project studies in society.
Originality/value: This paper positions research as a social process, and the role of researchers as actors shaping research in project studies.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftInternational Journal of Managing Projects in Business
Vol/bind9
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)767 – 797
Antal sider31
ISSN1753-8378
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2016
Udgivet eksterntJa

Emneord

  • Reflexivity
  • Sociology of science
  • Habermas
  • Scholarship
  • Interpretative ontology
  • Rethinking project management

Citer dette

@article{7605e02c9d45425cb18f79f14311fabb,
title = "Project Studies and Engaged Scholarship: Directions Towards Contextualized and Reflexive Research on Projects",
abstract = "Purpose: In 2006, the “Rethinking Project Management” network called for a paradigm shift in project research, and proposed five research directions. The directions inspired research and marked a milestone in the development of the field. The purpose of this paper is to reflect on the past decade and to rejuvenate these research directions.Design/methodology/approach: The authors propose the umbrella term: “project studies” to denote the research related to projects and temporary organizing. Project studies is conceived not only as a body of research, but also as a social process embedded in research communities, and contemporary Zeitgeist. Based on Sandberg’s interpretative approach to the fit between work and works (in this case research-researcher) and Habermas’ three types of human interests: technical, practical, and emancipatory, the authors develop a conceptual framework circumscribing three types of research in project studies.Findings: The conceptual framework is used to craft future research directions, in the lines proposed by Winter et al. (2006b).Research limitations/implications: The authors conclude by proposing for a sixth theme on the practice of theorizing, and call for engaged, ambidextrous scholars, who’s “job” goes beyond the writing of articles and research applications, and includes shaping discourses of project research, nurturing new project scholars, contributing to project practice and carefully considering the legacy of projects and project studies in society.Originality/value: This paper positions research as a social process, and the role of researchers as actors shaping research in project studies.",
keywords = "Reflexivity, Sociology of science, Habermas, Scholarship, Interpretative ontology, Rethinking project management, Reflexivity, Sociology of science, Habermas, Scholarship, Interpretative ontology, Rethinking project management",
author = "Joana Geraldi and Jonas S{\"o}derlund",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1108/IJMPB-02-2016-0016",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "767 – 797",
journal = "International Journal of Managing Projects in Business",
issn = "1753-8378",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing",
number = "4",

}

Project Studies and Engaged Scholarship : Directions Towards Contextualized and Reflexive Research on Projects. / Geraldi, Joana ; Söderlund, Jonas.

I: International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, Bind 9, Nr. 4, 2016, s. 767 – 797.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Project Studies and Engaged Scholarship

T2 - Directions Towards Contextualized and Reflexive Research on Projects

AU - Geraldi, Joana

AU - Söderlund, Jonas

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Purpose: In 2006, the “Rethinking Project Management” network called for a paradigm shift in project research, and proposed five research directions. The directions inspired research and marked a milestone in the development of the field. The purpose of this paper is to reflect on the past decade and to rejuvenate these research directions.Design/methodology/approach: The authors propose the umbrella term: “project studies” to denote the research related to projects and temporary organizing. Project studies is conceived not only as a body of research, but also as a social process embedded in research communities, and contemporary Zeitgeist. Based on Sandberg’s interpretative approach to the fit between work and works (in this case research-researcher) and Habermas’ three types of human interests: technical, practical, and emancipatory, the authors develop a conceptual framework circumscribing three types of research in project studies.Findings: The conceptual framework is used to craft future research directions, in the lines proposed by Winter et al. (2006b).Research limitations/implications: The authors conclude by proposing for a sixth theme on the practice of theorizing, and call for engaged, ambidextrous scholars, who’s “job” goes beyond the writing of articles and research applications, and includes shaping discourses of project research, nurturing new project scholars, contributing to project practice and carefully considering the legacy of projects and project studies in society.Originality/value: This paper positions research as a social process, and the role of researchers as actors shaping research in project studies.

AB - Purpose: In 2006, the “Rethinking Project Management” network called for a paradigm shift in project research, and proposed five research directions. The directions inspired research and marked a milestone in the development of the field. The purpose of this paper is to reflect on the past decade and to rejuvenate these research directions.Design/methodology/approach: The authors propose the umbrella term: “project studies” to denote the research related to projects and temporary organizing. Project studies is conceived not only as a body of research, but also as a social process embedded in research communities, and contemporary Zeitgeist. Based on Sandberg’s interpretative approach to the fit between work and works (in this case research-researcher) and Habermas’ three types of human interests: technical, practical, and emancipatory, the authors develop a conceptual framework circumscribing three types of research in project studies.Findings: The conceptual framework is used to craft future research directions, in the lines proposed by Winter et al. (2006b).Research limitations/implications: The authors conclude by proposing for a sixth theme on the practice of theorizing, and call for engaged, ambidextrous scholars, who’s “job” goes beyond the writing of articles and research applications, and includes shaping discourses of project research, nurturing new project scholars, contributing to project practice and carefully considering the legacy of projects and project studies in society.Originality/value: This paper positions research as a social process, and the role of researchers as actors shaping research in project studies.

KW - Reflexivity

KW - Sociology of science

KW - Habermas

KW - Scholarship

KW - Interpretative ontology

KW - Rethinking project management

KW - Reflexivity

KW - Sociology of science

KW - Habermas

KW - Scholarship

KW - Interpretative ontology

KW - Rethinking project management

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=1000000000366359

U2 - 10.1108/IJMPB-02-2016-0016

DO - 10.1108/IJMPB-02-2016-0016

M3 - Journal article

VL - 9

SP - 767

EP - 797

JO - International Journal of Managing Projects in Business

JF - International Journal of Managing Projects in Business

SN - 1753-8378

IS - 4

ER -