Professional Agency in the Ecology of Wrongdoing

Publikation: Working paperForskning

Resumé

This study offers an account of individual agency within a constructivist view of professional wrongdoing. The main contribution is a model in which the neglected role of individual professionals is foregrounded, offering the basis for testable propositions about future misconduct. Professionals are represented in the model neither as “bad apples” nor as passive recipients of social control; instead, they formulate independent understandings of wrongdoing and lines of action in response to the combined influences of globalization and of collective actors, such as states and professional societies. The model is derived inductively from data on the wealth management profession, which specializes in developing tax avoidance strategies for high-net-worth individuals. This case is particularly appropriate because tax avoidance is among the most hotly-contested domains of professional misconduct globally, particularly following the Panama Papers scandal of 2016. Drawing from 65 interviews with wealth managers in 18 countries, supplemented by data from newspaper accounts and the professional association, the analysis yields a model that adds granularity and variation to the constructivist approach.
This study offers an account of individual agency within a constructivist view of professional wrongdoing. The main contribution is a model in which the neglected role of individual professionals is foregrounded, offering the basis for testable propositions about future misconduct. Professionals are represented in the model neither as “bad apples” nor as passive recipients of social control; instead, they formulate independent understandings of wrongdoing and lines of action in response to the combined influences of globalization and of collective actors, such as states and professional societies. The model is derived inductively from data on the wealth management profession, which specializes in developing tax avoidance strategies for high-net-worth individuals. This case is particularly appropriate because tax avoidance is among the most hotly-contested domains of professional misconduct globally, particularly following the Panama Papers scandal of 2016. Drawing from 65 interviews with wealth managers in 18 countries, supplemented by data from newspaper accounts and the professional association, the analysis yields a model that adds granularity and variation to the constructivist approach.
SprogEngelsk
Udgivelses stedBergen
UdgiverSidgwick & Jackson
Antal sider46
StatusUdgivet - 2018
NavnCMI Working Paper
Nummer2018:8
ISSN0804-3639

Emneord

  • Professional wrongdoing
  • Constructivism
  • Tax avoidance
  • Wealth management

Citer dette

Harrington, B. (2018). Professional Agency in the Ecology of Wrongdoing. Bergen: Sidgwick & Jackson. CMI Working Paper, Nr. 2018:8
Harrington, Brooke. / Professional Agency in the Ecology of Wrongdoing. Bergen : Sidgwick & Jackson, 2018. (CMI Working Paper; Nr. 2018:8).
@techreport{97f239c890394ff296b467a03270adaf,
title = "Professional Agency in the Ecology of Wrongdoing",
abstract = "This study offers an account of individual agency within a constructivist view of professional wrongdoing. The main contribution is a model in which the neglected role of individual professionals is foregrounded, offering the basis for testable propositions about future misconduct. Professionals are represented in the model neither as “bad apples” nor as passive recipients of social control; instead, they formulate independent understandings of wrongdoing and lines of action in response to the combined influences of globalization and of collective actors, such as states and professional societies. The model is derived inductively from data on the wealth management profession, which specializes in developing tax avoidance strategies for high-net-worth individuals. This case is particularly appropriate because tax avoidance is among the most hotly-contested domains of professional misconduct globally, particularly following the Panama Papers scandal of 2016. Drawing from 65 interviews with wealth managers in 18 countries, supplemented by data from newspaper accounts and the professional association, the analysis yields a model that adds granularity and variation to the constructivist approach.",
keywords = "Professional wrongdoing, Constructivism, Tax avoidance, Wealth management, Professional wrongdoing, Constructivism, Tax avoidance, Wealth management",
author = "Brooke Harrington",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
publisher = "Sidgwick & Jackson",
address = "Norway",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Sidgwick & Jackson",

}

Professional Agency in the Ecology of Wrongdoing. / Harrington, Brooke.

Bergen : Sidgwick & Jackson, 2018.

Publikation: Working paperForskning

TY - UNPB

T1 - Professional Agency in the Ecology of Wrongdoing

AU - Harrington,Brooke

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - This study offers an account of individual agency within a constructivist view of professional wrongdoing. The main contribution is a model in which the neglected role of individual professionals is foregrounded, offering the basis for testable propositions about future misconduct. Professionals are represented in the model neither as “bad apples” nor as passive recipients of social control; instead, they formulate independent understandings of wrongdoing and lines of action in response to the combined influences of globalization and of collective actors, such as states and professional societies. The model is derived inductively from data on the wealth management profession, which specializes in developing tax avoidance strategies for high-net-worth individuals. This case is particularly appropriate because tax avoidance is among the most hotly-contested domains of professional misconduct globally, particularly following the Panama Papers scandal of 2016. Drawing from 65 interviews with wealth managers in 18 countries, supplemented by data from newspaper accounts and the professional association, the analysis yields a model that adds granularity and variation to the constructivist approach.

AB - This study offers an account of individual agency within a constructivist view of professional wrongdoing. The main contribution is a model in which the neglected role of individual professionals is foregrounded, offering the basis for testable propositions about future misconduct. Professionals are represented in the model neither as “bad apples” nor as passive recipients of social control; instead, they formulate independent understandings of wrongdoing and lines of action in response to the combined influences of globalization and of collective actors, such as states and professional societies. The model is derived inductively from data on the wealth management profession, which specializes in developing tax avoidance strategies for high-net-worth individuals. This case is particularly appropriate because tax avoidance is among the most hotly-contested domains of professional misconduct globally, particularly following the Panama Papers scandal of 2016. Drawing from 65 interviews with wealth managers in 18 countries, supplemented by data from newspaper accounts and the professional association, the analysis yields a model that adds granularity and variation to the constructivist approach.

KW - Professional wrongdoing

KW - Constructivism

KW - Tax avoidance

KW - Wealth management

KW - Professional wrongdoing

KW - Constructivism

KW - Tax avoidance

KW - Wealth management

M3 - Working paper

BT - Professional Agency in the Ecology of Wrongdoing

PB - Sidgwick & Jackson

CY - Bergen

ER -