Political (Tax) Equity in a Global Context: Voting Rights Compared to Income Taxation and Welfare Benefits from the Swedish Perspective

Publikation: Working paperForskning

Resumé

This project focuses on the increasing global mobility across different taxpayer groups and examines how this mobility separates individual taxpayers and as such leads to deficiencies in social justice and political equity. Theories referable to social contract and citizenship are central to the project as they are often contrasted against each other, illustrating that it may be necessary to apply both in order to achieve political equity between individuals. To clarify, citizens may directly influence tax legislation and public spending through voting rights awarded due to their citizenship, resulting in political equity between non-taxpaying citizens and taxpaying citizens as they are equally entitled to vote regardless whether they have contributed to state finances or not. However, the application of citizenship as the requirement for voting privileges excludes taxpaying non-citizens from influencing regardless whether they have contributed to state finances through taxation or otherwise contributed to society. This suggests an antagonistic relationship between social contract and citizenship yet in this project it becomes evident that they are acting as safeguards supplementing weaknesses of the other. Both are as such necessary to be considered at tax policy level in order to strengthen political equity in a society where individuals are becoming more mobile, and as such less restricted by territorial affiliation or formal citizenship. The paper applies a case study comprising different (international) taxpayer groups in order to identify mismatches between legal frameworks dealing with taxation, access to welfare benefits and voting. These mismatches leads to deficient equity as taxpayers are treated differently with reference to their state of origin in addition to wealth and taxing ability.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Udgivelses stedMunich
UdgiverMax-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung
Antal sider24
StatusUdgivet - 2019
NavnWorking Paper of the Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance
Nummer2019-14

Emneord

  • International taxation
  • Mobile workers
  • Voting
  • Congruence
  • Social insurance law

Citer dette

Lind, Y. (2019). Political (Tax) Equity in a Global Context: Voting Rights Compared to Income Taxation and Welfare Benefits from the Swedish Perspective. Munich: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung. Working Paper of the Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance, Nr. 2019-14
Lind, Yvette . / Political (Tax) Equity in a Global Context : Voting Rights Compared to Income Taxation and Welfare Benefits from the Swedish Perspective. Munich : Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung, 2019. (Working Paper of the Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance; Nr. 2019-14).
@techreport{655c1f87fb1a4ea6bbda69a811517495,
title = "Political (Tax) Equity in a Global Context: Voting Rights Compared to Income Taxation and Welfare Benefits from the Swedish Perspective",
abstract = "This project focuses on the increasing global mobility across different taxpayer groups and examines how this mobility separates individual taxpayers and as such leads to deficiencies in social justice and political equity. Theories referable to social contract and citizenship are central to the project as they are often contrasted against each other, illustrating that it may be necessary to apply both in order to achieve political equity between individuals. To clarify, citizens may directly influence tax legislation and public spending through voting rights awarded due to their citizenship, resulting in political equity between non-taxpaying citizens and taxpaying citizens as they are equally entitled to vote regardless whether they have contributed to state finances or not. However, the application of citizenship as the requirement for voting privileges excludes taxpaying non-citizens from influencing regardless whether they have contributed to state finances through taxation or otherwise contributed to society. This suggests an antagonistic relationship between social contract and citizenship yet in this project it becomes evident that they are acting as safeguards supplementing weaknesses of the other. Both are as such necessary to be considered at tax policy level in order to strengthen political equity in a society where individuals are becoming more mobile, and as such less restricted by territorial affiliation or formal citizenship. The paper applies a case study comprising different (international) taxpayer groups in order to identify mismatches between legal frameworks dealing with taxation, access to welfare benefits and voting. These mismatches leads to deficient equity as taxpayers are treated differently with reference to their state of origin in addition to wealth and taxing ability.",
keywords = "International taxation, Mobile workers, Voting, Congruence, Social insurance law, International taxation, Mobile workers, Voting, Congruence, Social insurance law",
author = "Yvette Lind",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
series = "Working Paper of the Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance",
publisher = "Max-Planck-Institut f{\"u}r Gesellschaftsforschung",
number = "2019-14",
address = "Germany",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Max-Planck-Institut f{\"u}r Gesellschaftsforschung",

}

Political (Tax) Equity in a Global Context : Voting Rights Compared to Income Taxation and Welfare Benefits from the Swedish Perspective. / Lind, Yvette .

Munich : Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung, 2019.

Publikation: Working paperForskning

TY - UNPB

T1 - Political (Tax) Equity in a Global Context

T2 - Voting Rights Compared to Income Taxation and Welfare Benefits from the Swedish Perspective

AU - Lind, Yvette

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - This project focuses on the increasing global mobility across different taxpayer groups and examines how this mobility separates individual taxpayers and as such leads to deficiencies in social justice and political equity. Theories referable to social contract and citizenship are central to the project as they are often contrasted against each other, illustrating that it may be necessary to apply both in order to achieve political equity between individuals. To clarify, citizens may directly influence tax legislation and public spending through voting rights awarded due to their citizenship, resulting in political equity between non-taxpaying citizens and taxpaying citizens as they are equally entitled to vote regardless whether they have contributed to state finances or not. However, the application of citizenship as the requirement for voting privileges excludes taxpaying non-citizens from influencing regardless whether they have contributed to state finances through taxation or otherwise contributed to society. This suggests an antagonistic relationship between social contract and citizenship yet in this project it becomes evident that they are acting as safeguards supplementing weaknesses of the other. Both are as such necessary to be considered at tax policy level in order to strengthen political equity in a society where individuals are becoming more mobile, and as such less restricted by territorial affiliation or formal citizenship. The paper applies a case study comprising different (international) taxpayer groups in order to identify mismatches between legal frameworks dealing with taxation, access to welfare benefits and voting. These mismatches leads to deficient equity as taxpayers are treated differently with reference to their state of origin in addition to wealth and taxing ability.

AB - This project focuses on the increasing global mobility across different taxpayer groups and examines how this mobility separates individual taxpayers and as such leads to deficiencies in social justice and political equity. Theories referable to social contract and citizenship are central to the project as they are often contrasted against each other, illustrating that it may be necessary to apply both in order to achieve political equity between individuals. To clarify, citizens may directly influence tax legislation and public spending through voting rights awarded due to their citizenship, resulting in political equity between non-taxpaying citizens and taxpaying citizens as they are equally entitled to vote regardless whether they have contributed to state finances or not. However, the application of citizenship as the requirement for voting privileges excludes taxpaying non-citizens from influencing regardless whether they have contributed to state finances through taxation or otherwise contributed to society. This suggests an antagonistic relationship between social contract and citizenship yet in this project it becomes evident that they are acting as safeguards supplementing weaknesses of the other. Both are as such necessary to be considered at tax policy level in order to strengthen political equity in a society where individuals are becoming more mobile, and as such less restricted by territorial affiliation or formal citizenship. The paper applies a case study comprising different (international) taxpayer groups in order to identify mismatches between legal frameworks dealing with taxation, access to welfare benefits and voting. These mismatches leads to deficient equity as taxpayers are treated differently with reference to their state of origin in addition to wealth and taxing ability.

KW - International taxation

KW - Mobile workers

KW - Voting

KW - Congruence

KW - Social insurance law

KW - International taxation

KW - Mobile workers

KW - Voting

KW - Congruence

KW - Social insurance law

M3 - Working paper

T3 - Working Paper of the Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance

BT - Political (Tax) Equity in a Global Context

PB - Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung

CY - Munich

ER -