Policy Ideas, Knowledge Regimes and Comparative Political Economy

John L. Campbell, Ove K. Pedersen

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    Resumé

    Despite much attention to how ideas affect policy making, where these ideas come from is a blind spot in comparative political economy. We show that an important source of policy ideas are knowledge regimes—fields of policy research organizations. We show as well that the organization of knowledge regimes is heavily influenced by the organization of their surrounding political economies such that knowledge regimes have particular national characters. Furthermore, when people perceive that the utility of their knowledge regime for the rest of the political economy breaks down, they often try to restore it by transforming their knowledge regimes, albeit in ways that are still shaped by the surrounding political and economic institutions. The effectiveness of their efforts is not guaranteed. The argument is based on an analysis of the evolution of knowledge regimes since the 1970s in the USA, France and Germany. Theoretical implications are explored for two literatures in comparative political economy: ideational analysis and the varieties of capitalism.
    Despite much attention to how ideas affect policy making, where these ideas come from is a blind spot in comparative political economy. We show that an important source of policy ideas are knowledge regimes—fields of policy research organizations. We show as well that the organization of knowledge regimes is heavily influenced by the organization of their surrounding political economies such that knowledge regimes have particular national characters. Furthermore, when people perceive that the utility of their knowledge regime for the rest of the political economy breaks down, they often try to restore it by transforming their knowledge regimes, albeit in ways that are still shaped by the surrounding political and economic institutions. The effectiveness of their efforts is not guaranteed. The argument is based on an analysis of the evolution of knowledge regimes since the 1970s in the USA, France and Germany. Theoretical implications are explored for two literatures in comparative political economy: ideational analysis and the varieties of capitalism.
    SprogEngelsk
    TidsskriftSocio-Economic Review
    Vol/bind13
    Udgave nummer4
    Sider67-701
    ISSN1475-1461
    DOI
    StatusUdgivet - 2015

    Emneord

      Citer dette

      @article{e4ce8051fa9e455984cc2dd2194bc53e,
      title = "Policy Ideas, Knowledge Regimes and Comparative Political Economy",
      abstract = "Despite much attention to how ideas affect policy making, where these ideas come from is a blind spot in comparative political economy. We show that an important source of policy ideas are knowledge regimes—fields of policy research organizations. We show as well that the organization of knowledge regimes is heavily influenced by the organization of their surrounding political economies such that knowledge regimes have particular national characters. Furthermore, when people perceive that the utility of their knowledge regime for the rest of the political economy breaks down, they often try to restore it by transforming their knowledge regimes, albeit in ways that are still shaped by the surrounding political and economic institutions. The effectiveness of their efforts is not guaranteed. The argument is based on an analysis of the evolution of knowledge regimes since the 1970s in the USA, France and Germany. Theoretical implications are explored for two literatures in comparative political economy: ideational analysis and the varieties of capitalism.",
      keywords = "Political Economy, Varieties of capitalism, France, Germany, USA",
      author = "Campbell, {John L.} and Pedersen, {Ove K.}",
      year = "2015",
      doi = "10.1093/ser/mwv004",
      language = "English",
      volume = "13",
      pages = "67--701",
      journal = "Socio-Economic Review",
      issn = "1475-1461",
      publisher = "Oxford University Press",
      number = "4",

      }

      Policy Ideas, Knowledge Regimes and Comparative Political Economy. / Campbell, John L.; Pedersen, Ove K.

      I: Socio-Economic Review, Bind 13, Nr. 4, 2015, s. 67-701.

      Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

      TY - JOUR

      T1 - Policy Ideas, Knowledge Regimes and Comparative Political Economy

      AU - Campbell,John L.

      AU - Pedersen,Ove K.

      PY - 2015

      Y1 - 2015

      N2 - Despite much attention to how ideas affect policy making, where these ideas come from is a blind spot in comparative political economy. We show that an important source of policy ideas are knowledge regimes—fields of policy research organizations. We show as well that the organization of knowledge regimes is heavily influenced by the organization of their surrounding political economies such that knowledge regimes have particular national characters. Furthermore, when people perceive that the utility of their knowledge regime for the rest of the political economy breaks down, they often try to restore it by transforming their knowledge regimes, albeit in ways that are still shaped by the surrounding political and economic institutions. The effectiveness of their efforts is not guaranteed. The argument is based on an analysis of the evolution of knowledge regimes since the 1970s in the USA, France and Germany. Theoretical implications are explored for two literatures in comparative political economy: ideational analysis and the varieties of capitalism.

      AB - Despite much attention to how ideas affect policy making, where these ideas come from is a blind spot in comparative political economy. We show that an important source of policy ideas are knowledge regimes—fields of policy research organizations. We show as well that the organization of knowledge regimes is heavily influenced by the organization of their surrounding political economies such that knowledge regimes have particular national characters. Furthermore, when people perceive that the utility of their knowledge regime for the rest of the political economy breaks down, they often try to restore it by transforming their knowledge regimes, albeit in ways that are still shaped by the surrounding political and economic institutions. The effectiveness of their efforts is not guaranteed. The argument is based on an analysis of the evolution of knowledge regimes since the 1970s in the USA, France and Germany. Theoretical implications are explored for two literatures in comparative political economy: ideational analysis and the varieties of capitalism.

      KW - Political Economy

      KW - Varieties of capitalism

      KW - France

      KW - Germany

      KW - USA

      UR - http://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=111054307361010

      U2 - 10.1093/ser/mwv004

      DO - 10.1093/ser/mwv004

      M3 - Journal article

      VL - 13

      SP - 67

      EP - 701

      JO - Socio-Economic Review

      T2 - Socio-Economic Review

      JF - Socio-Economic Review

      SN - 1475-1461

      IS - 4

      ER -