Organizational Discourse Analysis - Well Done or too Rare? A Reply to our Critics

Mats Alvesson, Dan Kärreman

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    Abstrakt

    In this article we respond to Bargiela-Chiappini, Iedema and Mumby.We notice that there is considerable agreement concerning the state of the art of organizational discourse analysis, while also discussing the disagreements. We expand on some of the ontological issues inherent in our argument, further discuss the character of reductionism in organizational discourse analysis, the trappings of a priori assumptions, and, finally, argue that our critics themselves, perhaps inadvertently, tend to repeat the problematic moves we identified in our original article.
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    TidsskriftHuman Relations
    Vol/bind64
    Udgave nummer9
    Sider (fra-til)1193-1202
    ISSN0018-7267
    DOI
    StatusUdgivet - 2011

    Citationsformater