Organizational Boundaries in Fluid Forms of Production: The Case of Apache Open Source Software

Vitaliano Barberio, Markus A. Höllerer, Renate Meyer, Dennis Jancsary

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskningpeer review

Resumé

This chapter explores the multiplicity, formation, and porosity of organizational boundaries in new, fluid forms of production. Conceptualizing them as “partial organizations,” we argue that both the intentional design of organizational elements (such as membership, hierarchy, rules, monitoring, and sanctioning) as well as unintended adjustments of “unorganized” aspects drive boundary formation and impact boundary porosity. In addition, we contend that structuring dynamics will create specific trajectories for boundaries over time. Empirically, we further our theoretical framework on the basis of an in-depth case study of the Apache open-source software community during its formative years (1995–2002). We find that both the salience and formalization of boundaries increase over time. However, different conceptions of boundaries (such as efficiency, competence, power, and identity) become salient at different points in time. While design and adjustment drive boundary formation with regard to all boundary conceptions in our empirical case, porosity develops differently for each of them. We also demonstrate that the formalization of boundaries does not necessarily reduce boundary porosity, but actually may increase it.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TitelTowards Permeable Boundaries of Organizations?
RedaktørerLeopold Ringel, Petra Hiller, Charlene Zietsma
Antal sider30
Udgivelses stedBingley
ForlagEmerald Group Publishing
Publikationsdato2018
Sider139-168
ISBN (Trykt)9781787438293
ISBN (Elektronisk)9781787438286, 9781787439917
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2018
NavnResearch in the Sociology of Organizations
Vol/bind57
ISSN0733-558X

Emneord

  • Organizational boundaries
  • Partial organization
  • Fluid forms of production
  • Community-managed production
  • Open-source software

Citer dette

Barberio, V., Höllerer, M. A., Meyer, R., & Jancsary, D. (2018). Organizational Boundaries in Fluid Forms of Production: The Case of Apache Open Source Software. I L. Ringel, P. Hiller, & C. Zietsma (red.), Towards Permeable Boundaries of Organizations? (s. 139-168). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Bind. 57 https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20180000057006
Barberio, Vitaliano ; Höllerer, Markus A. ; Meyer, Renate ; Jancsary, Dennis. / Organizational Boundaries in Fluid Forms of Production : The Case of Apache Open Source Software. Towards Permeable Boundaries of Organizations?. red. / Leopold Ringel ; Petra Hiller ; Charlene Zietsma. Bingley : Emerald Group Publishing, 2018. s. 139-168 (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Bind 57).
@inbook{46c0edf5d98b436ba171cb47f1ae8102,
title = "Organizational Boundaries in Fluid Forms of Production: The Case of Apache Open Source Software",
abstract = "This chapter explores the multiplicity, formation, and porosity of organizational boundaries in new, fluid forms of production. Conceptualizing them as “partial organizations,” we argue that both the intentional design of organizational elements (such as membership, hierarchy, rules, monitoring, and sanctioning) as well as unintended adjustments of “unorganized” aspects drive boundary formation and impact boundary porosity. In addition, we contend that structuring dynamics will create specific trajectories for boundaries over time. Empirically, we further our theoretical framework on the basis of an in-depth case study of the Apache open-source software community during its formative years (1995–2002). We find that both the salience and formalization of boundaries increase over time. However, different conceptions of boundaries (such as efficiency, competence, power, and identity) become salient at different points in time. While design and adjustment drive boundary formation with regard to all boundary conceptions in our empirical case, porosity develops differently for each of them. We also demonstrate that the formalization of boundaries does not necessarily reduce boundary porosity, but actually may increase it.",
keywords = "Organizational boundaries, Partial organization, Fluid forms of production, Community-managed production, Open-source software, Organizational boundaries, Partial organization, Fluid forms of production, Community-managed production, Open-source software",
author = "Vitaliano Barberio and H{\"o}llerer, {Markus A.} and Renate Meyer and Dennis Jancsary",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1108/S0733-558X20180000057006",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781787438293",
series = "Research in the Sociology of Organizations",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing",
pages = "139--168",
editor = "Leopold Ringel and Petra Hiller and Charlene Zietsma",
booktitle = "Towards Permeable Boundaries of Organizations?",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Barberio, V, Höllerer, MA, Meyer, R & Jancsary, D 2018, Organizational Boundaries in Fluid Forms of Production: The Case of Apache Open Source Software. i L Ringel, P Hiller & C Zietsma (red), Towards Permeable Boundaries of Organizations?. Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, bind 57, s. 139-168. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20180000057006

Organizational Boundaries in Fluid Forms of Production : The Case of Apache Open Source Software. / Barberio, Vitaliano; Höllerer, Markus A.; Meyer, Renate; Jancsary, Dennis.

Towards Permeable Boundaries of Organizations?. red. / Leopold Ringel; Petra Hiller; Charlene Zietsma. Bingley : Emerald Group Publishing, 2018. s. 139-168 (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Bind 57).

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskningpeer review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Organizational Boundaries in Fluid Forms of Production

T2 - The Case of Apache Open Source Software

AU - Barberio, Vitaliano

AU - Höllerer, Markus A.

AU - Meyer, Renate

AU - Jancsary, Dennis

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - This chapter explores the multiplicity, formation, and porosity of organizational boundaries in new, fluid forms of production. Conceptualizing them as “partial organizations,” we argue that both the intentional design of organizational elements (such as membership, hierarchy, rules, monitoring, and sanctioning) as well as unintended adjustments of “unorganized” aspects drive boundary formation and impact boundary porosity. In addition, we contend that structuring dynamics will create specific trajectories for boundaries over time. Empirically, we further our theoretical framework on the basis of an in-depth case study of the Apache open-source software community during its formative years (1995–2002). We find that both the salience and formalization of boundaries increase over time. However, different conceptions of boundaries (such as efficiency, competence, power, and identity) become salient at different points in time. While design and adjustment drive boundary formation with regard to all boundary conceptions in our empirical case, porosity develops differently for each of them. We also demonstrate that the formalization of boundaries does not necessarily reduce boundary porosity, but actually may increase it.

AB - This chapter explores the multiplicity, formation, and porosity of organizational boundaries in new, fluid forms of production. Conceptualizing them as “partial organizations,” we argue that both the intentional design of organizational elements (such as membership, hierarchy, rules, monitoring, and sanctioning) as well as unintended adjustments of “unorganized” aspects drive boundary formation and impact boundary porosity. In addition, we contend that structuring dynamics will create specific trajectories for boundaries over time. Empirically, we further our theoretical framework on the basis of an in-depth case study of the Apache open-source software community during its formative years (1995–2002). We find that both the salience and formalization of boundaries increase over time. However, different conceptions of boundaries (such as efficiency, competence, power, and identity) become salient at different points in time. While design and adjustment drive boundary formation with regard to all boundary conceptions in our empirical case, porosity develops differently for each of them. We also demonstrate that the formalization of boundaries does not necessarily reduce boundary porosity, but actually may increase it.

KW - Organizational boundaries

KW - Partial organization

KW - Fluid forms of production

KW - Community-managed production

KW - Open-source software

KW - Organizational boundaries

KW - Partial organization

KW - Fluid forms of production

KW - Community-managed production

KW - Open-source software

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=960239021695&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1108/S0733-558X20180000057006

DO - 10.1108/S0733-558X20180000057006

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 9781787438293

T3 - Research in the Sociology of Organizations

SP - 139

EP - 168

BT - Towards Permeable Boundaries of Organizations?

A2 - Ringel, Leopold

A2 - Hiller, Petra

A2 - Zietsma, Charlene

PB - Emerald Group Publishing

CY - Bingley

ER -

Barberio V, Höllerer MA, Meyer R, Jancsary D. Organizational Boundaries in Fluid Forms of Production: The Case of Apache Open Source Software. I Ringel L, Hiller P, Zietsma C, red., Towards Permeable Boundaries of Organizations?. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing. 2018. s. 139-168. (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Bind 57). https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20180000057006