Open Method of Co-Ordination for Demoi-Cracy? Standards and Purposes

Susana Borrás, Claudio Radaelli

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    Resumé

    Under which conditions does the open method of co-ordination match the standards for demoi-cracy? To answer this question, we need some explicit standards about demoi-cracy. In fact, open co-ordination serves three different but interrelated purposes in European Union policy: to facilitate convergence; to support learning processes; and to encourage exploration of policy innovation. By intersecting standards and purposes, we find open co-ordination is neither inherently ‘good’ nor ‘bad’ for demoi-cracy, as it depends on how it has been put into practice. Therefore, we qualify the answer considering the empirical evidence on how normative principles hit the road of implementation. In the final part of this paper, we look into the demoi-cratic effects of the Eurozone's economic and financial crisis on our findings.
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    TidsskriftJournal of European Public Policy
    Vol/bind22
    Udgave nummer1
    Sider (fra-til)129-144
    Antal sider16
    ISSN1350-1763
    DOI
    StatusUdgivet - 2014

    Emneord

    • Democracy
    • Demoicracy
    • European Union
    • Open method of co-ordination
    • Comparative public policy

    Citer dette

    @article{c2859552222c455fa2d333a23697f3b4,
    title = "Open Method of Co-Ordination for Demoi-Cracy?: Standards and Purposes",
    abstract = "Under which conditions does the open method of co-ordination match the standards for demoi-cracy? To answer this question, we need some explicit standards about demoi-cracy. In fact, open co-ordination serves three different but interrelated purposes in European Union policy: to facilitate convergence; to support learning processes; and to encourage exploration of policy innovation. By intersecting standards and purposes, we find open co-ordination is neither inherently ‘good’ nor ‘bad’ for demoi-cracy, as it depends on how it has been put into practice. Therefore, we qualify the answer considering the empirical evidence on how normative principles hit the road of implementation. In the final part of this paper, we look into the demoi-cratic effects of the Eurozone's economic and financial crisis on our findings.",
    keywords = "Democracy, Demoicracy, European Union, Open method of co-ordination, Comparative public policy",
    author = "Susana Borr{\'a}s and Claudio Radaelli",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1080/13501763.2014.881412",
    language = "English",
    volume = "22",
    pages = "129--144",
    journal = "Journal of European Public Policy",
    issn = "1350-1763",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "1",

    }

    Open Method of Co-Ordination for Demoi-Cracy? Standards and Purposes. / Borrás, Susana; Radaelli, Claudio.

    I: Journal of European Public Policy, Bind 22, Nr. 1, 2014, s. 129-144.

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Open Method of Co-Ordination for Demoi-Cracy?

    T2 - Standards and Purposes

    AU - Borrás, Susana

    AU - Radaelli, Claudio

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - Under which conditions does the open method of co-ordination match the standards for demoi-cracy? To answer this question, we need some explicit standards about demoi-cracy. In fact, open co-ordination serves three different but interrelated purposes in European Union policy: to facilitate convergence; to support learning processes; and to encourage exploration of policy innovation. By intersecting standards and purposes, we find open co-ordination is neither inherently ‘good’ nor ‘bad’ for demoi-cracy, as it depends on how it has been put into practice. Therefore, we qualify the answer considering the empirical evidence on how normative principles hit the road of implementation. In the final part of this paper, we look into the demoi-cratic effects of the Eurozone's economic and financial crisis on our findings.

    AB - Under which conditions does the open method of co-ordination match the standards for demoi-cracy? To answer this question, we need some explicit standards about demoi-cracy. In fact, open co-ordination serves three different but interrelated purposes in European Union policy: to facilitate convergence; to support learning processes; and to encourage exploration of policy innovation. By intersecting standards and purposes, we find open co-ordination is neither inherently ‘good’ nor ‘bad’ for demoi-cracy, as it depends on how it has been put into practice. Therefore, we qualify the answer considering the empirical evidence on how normative principles hit the road of implementation. In the final part of this paper, we look into the demoi-cratic effects of the Eurozone's economic and financial crisis on our findings.

    KW - Democracy

    KW - Demoicracy

    KW - European Union

    KW - Open method of co-ordination

    KW - Comparative public policy

    U2 - 10.1080/13501763.2014.881412

    DO - 10.1080/13501763.2014.881412

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 22

    SP - 129

    EP - 144

    JO - Journal of European Public Policy

    JF - Journal of European Public Policy

    SN - 1350-1763

    IS - 1

    ER -