Abstract
We disagree strongly with Cornelissen’s critique of the organizational identity metaphor on grounds that he: seriously underplays the generative strength of metaphor in the study of organizations; inappropriately applies the standards of assessment from one paradigm to the approaches of another; and raises false concerns about issues of self reference, reification and multilevel transference of concepts, among others.
| Originalsprog | Engelsk |
|---|---|
| Tidsskrift | British Journal of Management |
| Vol/bind | 13 |
| Udgave nummer | 3 |
| Sider (fra-til) | 269-275 |
| Antal sider | 7 |
| ISSN | 1045-3172 |
| DOI | |
| Status | Udgivet - 2002 |
Citationsformater
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver