Now, Let’s Make it Really Complex (Complicated): A Systematic Review of the Complexities of Projects

Joana Geraldi, Harvey Maylor, Terry Williams

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftAnmeldelseForskningpeer review

Resumé

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to contribute to operationsmanagement (OM)practice contingency research by describing the complexity of projects. Complexity is recognised as a key independent (contingent) variable that impacts on many subsequent decisions in the practice of managing projects.
Design/methodology/approach – This paper presents a systematic review of relevant literature and synthesises an integrated framework for assessing the complexities of managing projects.
Findings – This framework comprises five dimensions of complexity – structural, uncertainty, dynamics, pace and socio-political complexity. These five dimensions present individuals and organisations with choices about how they respond to each type of complexity, in terms of business case, strategic choice, process choice, managerial capacity and competencies.
Originality/value – The contribution of this paper is to provide a clarification to the epistemology of complexity, to demonstrate complexity as a lived experience for project managers, and offer a common language for both practitioners and future empirical studies considering the individual or organisational response to project complexities. The work also demonstrates an application of systematic review in OM research.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftInternational Journal of Operations and Production Management
Vol/bind31
Udgave nummer9
Sider (fra-til)966-990
Antal sider25
ISSN0144-3577
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2011
Udgivet eksterntJa

Emneord

  • Complexity
  • Uncertainty
  • Pace
  • Socio‐political complexity
  • Structural complexity
  • Typology
  • Lived experience
  • Project management
  • Systematic review
  • Operations management

Citer dette

@article{ab0db553768743fbb2c7c9086208b8a9,
title = "Now, Let’s Make it Really Complex (Complicated): A Systematic Review of the Complexities of Projects",
abstract = "Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to contribute to operationsmanagement (OM)practice contingency research by describing the complexity of projects. Complexity is recognised as a key independent (contingent) variable that impacts on many subsequent decisions in the practice of managing projects. Design/methodology/approach – This paper presents a systematic review of relevant literature and synthesises an integrated framework for assessing the complexities of managing projects. Findings – This framework comprises five dimensions of complexity – structural, uncertainty, dynamics, pace and socio-political complexity. These five dimensions present individuals and organisations with choices about how they respond to each type of complexity, in terms of business case, strategic choice, process choice, managerial capacity and competencies. Originality/value – The contribution of this paper is to provide a clarification to the epistemology of complexity, to demonstrate complexity as a lived experience for project managers, and offer a common language for both practitioners and future empirical studies considering the individual or organisational response to project complexities. The work also demonstrates an application of systematic review in OM research.",
keywords = "Complexity, Uncertainty, Pace, Socio‐political complexity, Structural complexity, Typology, Lived experience, Project management, Systematic review, Operations management, Complexity, Uncertainty, Pace, Socio‐political complexity, Structural complexity, Typology, Lived experience, Project management, Systematic review, Operations management",
author = "Joana Geraldi and Harvey Maylor and Terry Williams",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1108/01443571111165848",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "966--990",
journal = "International Journal of Operations and Production Management",
issn = "0144-3577",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing",
number = "9",

}

Now, Let’s Make it Really Complex (Complicated) : A Systematic Review of the Complexities of Projects. / Geraldi, Joana ; Maylor, Harvey; Williams, Terry.

I: International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Bind 31, Nr. 9, 2011, s. 966-990.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftAnmeldelseForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Now, Let’s Make it Really Complex (Complicated)

T2 - A Systematic Review of the Complexities of Projects

AU - Geraldi, Joana

AU - Maylor, Harvey

AU - Williams, Terry

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to contribute to operationsmanagement (OM)practice contingency research by describing the complexity of projects. Complexity is recognised as a key independent (contingent) variable that impacts on many subsequent decisions in the practice of managing projects. Design/methodology/approach – This paper presents a systematic review of relevant literature and synthesises an integrated framework for assessing the complexities of managing projects. Findings – This framework comprises five dimensions of complexity – structural, uncertainty, dynamics, pace and socio-political complexity. These five dimensions present individuals and organisations with choices about how they respond to each type of complexity, in terms of business case, strategic choice, process choice, managerial capacity and competencies. Originality/value – The contribution of this paper is to provide a clarification to the epistemology of complexity, to demonstrate complexity as a lived experience for project managers, and offer a common language for both practitioners and future empirical studies considering the individual or organisational response to project complexities. The work also demonstrates an application of systematic review in OM research.

AB - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to contribute to operationsmanagement (OM)practice contingency research by describing the complexity of projects. Complexity is recognised as a key independent (contingent) variable that impacts on many subsequent decisions in the practice of managing projects. Design/methodology/approach – This paper presents a systematic review of relevant literature and synthesises an integrated framework for assessing the complexities of managing projects. Findings – This framework comprises five dimensions of complexity – structural, uncertainty, dynamics, pace and socio-political complexity. These five dimensions present individuals and organisations with choices about how they respond to each type of complexity, in terms of business case, strategic choice, process choice, managerial capacity and competencies. Originality/value – The contribution of this paper is to provide a clarification to the epistemology of complexity, to demonstrate complexity as a lived experience for project managers, and offer a common language for both practitioners and future empirical studies considering the individual or organisational response to project complexities. The work also demonstrates an application of systematic review in OM research.

KW - Complexity

KW - Uncertainty

KW - Pace

KW - Socio‐political complexity

KW - Structural complexity

KW - Typology

KW - Lived experience

KW - Project management

KW - Systematic review

KW - Operations management

KW - Complexity

KW - Uncertainty

KW - Pace

KW - Socio‐political complexity

KW - Structural complexity

KW - Typology

KW - Lived experience

KW - Project management

KW - Systematic review

KW - Operations management

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921370616

U2 - 10.1108/01443571111165848

DO - 10.1108/01443571111165848

M3 - Book review

VL - 31

SP - 966

EP - 990

JO - International Journal of Operations and Production Management

JF - International Journal of Operations and Production Management

SN - 0144-3577

IS - 9

ER -