TY - JOUR
T1 - New Product Development Process Execution, Integration Mechanisms, Capabilities and Outcomes
T2 - Evidence from Chinese High‐Technology Ventures
AU - Robson, Matthew J.
AU - Chuang, Fu‐Mei
AU - Morgan, Robert E.
AU - Bıçakcıoğlu-Peynirci, Nilay
AU - Di Benedetto, C. Anthony
N1 - Published online: 18 November 2022.
PY - 2023/10
Y1 - 2023/10
N2 - This study examines new product development (NPD) processes in high-technology new product ventures in the emerging market context. Drawing upon the knowledge-based view and the capability-based view, we propose a model that characterizes relationships between NPD process execution stages and product competitive advantage, and accounts for the moderating effects of NPD integration mechanisms on these relationships. Our model also explains how pricing capabilities can become a liability that undermines how product advantage impacts new product performance. We test this framework within an emerging market context that has been notably absent from the literature. Our data are generated from 187 new product projects and a follow-up of 83 projects, from Chinese high-technology ventures. We identify important theoretical interdependencies within our structural model results. Specifically, marketing–technical integration positively moderates the relationship between product development and testing capability and commercialization capability, while new product implementation capability positively moderates the relationship of commercialization capability and product competitive advantage. Yet, penetration pricing capability negatively moderates the link between product competitive advantage and new product performance.
AB - This study examines new product development (NPD) processes in high-technology new product ventures in the emerging market context. Drawing upon the knowledge-based view and the capability-based view, we propose a model that characterizes relationships between NPD process execution stages and product competitive advantage, and accounts for the moderating effects of NPD integration mechanisms on these relationships. Our model also explains how pricing capabilities can become a liability that undermines how product advantage impacts new product performance. We test this framework within an emerging market context that has been notably absent from the literature. Our data are generated from 187 new product projects and a follow-up of 83 projects, from Chinese high-technology ventures. We identify important theoretical interdependencies within our structural model results. Specifically, marketing–technical integration positively moderates the relationship between product development and testing capability and commercialization capability, while new product implementation capability positively moderates the relationship of commercialization capability and product competitive advantage. Yet, penetration pricing capability negatively moderates the link between product competitive advantage and new product performance.
U2 - 10.1111/1467-8551.12686
DO - 10.1111/1467-8551.12686
M3 - Journal article
SN - 1045-3172
VL - 34
SP - 2036
EP - 2056
JO - British Journal of Management
JF - British Journal of Management
IS - 4
ER -