Neglecting the Proactive Aspect of Human Rights Due Diligence? A Critical Appraisal of the EU's Non-Financial Reporting Directive as a Pillar One Avenue for Promoting Pillar Two Action

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

27 Downloads (Pure)

Resumé

Firms' human rights due diligence (HRDD) and communication on their human rights impacts are not only elements in the Corporate Responsibility to Respect human rights (Pillar Two), but also to be promoted by States as part of their State Duty to Protect (Pillar One) through regulatory strategies aiming at shaping business conduct. Analysing the EU's 2014 Non-Financial Reporting Directive as an example of governmental regulation for promoting responsible business conduct, the article discusses conditions for HRDD and reporting as a communication process to stimulate organizational change in accordance with the UN Guiding Principles to avoid harm, including through affected-stakeholder engagement. Applying socio-legal regulatory theory along with organizational and accounting literature, the article finds that the Directive's predominant focus on ex-post measures appears to be a neglected opportunity to induce ex-ante organizational learning and changed business conduct to prevent adverse human rights impact. It offers recommendations for regulators and stakeholders for stronger regulation.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftBusiness and Human Rights Journal
Vol/bind3
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)23-45
Antal sider23
ISSN2057-0198
DOI
StatusUdgivet - jan. 2018

Emneord

  • Corporate responsibility to respect
  • Non-financial reporting
  • Human rights due diligence
  • Organizational change and regulatory strategy
  • State duty to protect

Citer dette

@article{8a0f0b52d5ce4ad9b47ff612acac7ac5,
title = "Neglecting the Proactive Aspect of Human Rights Due Diligence?: A Critical Appraisal of the EU's Non-Financial Reporting Directive as a Pillar One Avenue for Promoting Pillar Two Action",
abstract = "Firms' human rights due diligence (HRDD) and communication on their human rights impacts are not only elements in the Corporate Responsibility to Respect human rights (Pillar Two), but also to be promoted by States as part of their State Duty to Protect (Pillar One) through regulatory strategies aiming at shaping business conduct. Analysing the EU's 2014 Non-Financial Reporting Directive as an example of governmental regulation for promoting responsible business conduct, the article discusses conditions for HRDD and reporting as a communication process to stimulate organizational change in accordance with the UN Guiding Principles to avoid harm, including through affected-stakeholder engagement. Applying socio-legal regulatory theory along with organizational and accounting literature, the article finds that the Directive's predominant focus on ex-post measures appears to be a neglected opportunity to induce ex-ante organizational learning and changed business conduct to prevent adverse human rights impact. It offers recommendations for regulators and stakeholders for stronger regulation.",
keywords = "Corporate responsibility to respect, Non-financial reporting, Human rights due diligence, Organizational change and regulatory strategy, State duty to protect, Corporate responsibility to respect, Non-financial reporting, Human rights due diligence, Organizational change and regulatory strategy, State duty to protect",
author = "Karin Buhmann",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1017/bhj.2017.24",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "23--45",
journal = "Business and Human Rights Journal",
issn = "2057-0198",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neglecting the Proactive Aspect of Human Rights Due Diligence?

T2 - A Critical Appraisal of the EU's Non-Financial Reporting Directive as a Pillar One Avenue for Promoting Pillar Two Action

AU - Buhmann, Karin

PY - 2018/1

Y1 - 2018/1

N2 - Firms' human rights due diligence (HRDD) and communication on their human rights impacts are not only elements in the Corporate Responsibility to Respect human rights (Pillar Two), but also to be promoted by States as part of their State Duty to Protect (Pillar One) through regulatory strategies aiming at shaping business conduct. Analysing the EU's 2014 Non-Financial Reporting Directive as an example of governmental regulation for promoting responsible business conduct, the article discusses conditions for HRDD and reporting as a communication process to stimulate organizational change in accordance with the UN Guiding Principles to avoid harm, including through affected-stakeholder engagement. Applying socio-legal regulatory theory along with organizational and accounting literature, the article finds that the Directive's predominant focus on ex-post measures appears to be a neglected opportunity to induce ex-ante organizational learning and changed business conduct to prevent adverse human rights impact. It offers recommendations for regulators and stakeholders for stronger regulation.

AB - Firms' human rights due diligence (HRDD) and communication on their human rights impacts are not only elements in the Corporate Responsibility to Respect human rights (Pillar Two), but also to be promoted by States as part of their State Duty to Protect (Pillar One) through regulatory strategies aiming at shaping business conduct. Analysing the EU's 2014 Non-Financial Reporting Directive as an example of governmental regulation for promoting responsible business conduct, the article discusses conditions for HRDD and reporting as a communication process to stimulate organizational change in accordance with the UN Guiding Principles to avoid harm, including through affected-stakeholder engagement. Applying socio-legal regulatory theory along with organizational and accounting literature, the article finds that the Directive's predominant focus on ex-post measures appears to be a neglected opportunity to induce ex-ante organizational learning and changed business conduct to prevent adverse human rights impact. It offers recommendations for regulators and stakeholders for stronger regulation.

KW - Corporate responsibility to respect

KW - Non-financial reporting

KW - Human rights due diligence

KW - Organizational change and regulatory strategy

KW - State duty to protect

KW - Corporate responsibility to respect

KW - Non-financial reporting

KW - Human rights due diligence

KW - Organizational change and regulatory strategy

KW - State duty to protect

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=3710000000501687&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1017/bhj.2017.24

DO - 10.1017/bhj.2017.24

M3 - Journal article

VL - 3

SP - 23

EP - 45

JO - Business and Human Rights Journal

JF - Business and Human Rights Journal

SN - 2057-0198

IS - 1

ER -