Abstract
To study how populist sentiments have increasingly influenced businesses in society, we examine how German and Swedish corporations addressed the refugee situation in their 2015 and 2016 annual reports. We find that corporations changed their communication once refugee migration became subjected to populist political sentiments, but that they did so without subscribing to those sentiments. Although populism is based on such sharp oppositions as welcoming refugees or closing borders, our analysis shows that corporations have found ways to communicate about the refugee migration beyond these oppositions. Rather than taking a political stance, the corporations studied have primarily articulated the refugee situation as it pertains to their business operations. We identify four modes of articulation: the refugee as someone needing international aid, as a factor for economic analysis, as a benefit recipient, or as a potential stakeholder. These findings help nuance our understanding of how corporations navigate contested political issues.
| Originalsprog | Engelsk |
|---|---|
| Tidsskrift | Business & Society |
| Vol/bind | 63 |
| Udgave nummer | 2 |
| Sider (fra-til) | 341-372 |
| Antal sider | 32 |
| ISSN | 0007-6503 |
| DOI | |
| Status | Udgivet - feb. 2024 |
Bibliografisk note
Published online: 9 October 2023.FN’s Verdensmål
Dette resultat bidrager til følgende verdensmål
-
Verdensmål 16 Fred, retfærdighed og stærke institutioner
Emneord
- Corporate reporting
- Discourse analysis
- Politics
- Populism
- Refugee crisis
Citationsformater
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver