Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives on Sustainability

A Cross-Disciplinary Review and Research Agenda for Business Ethics

Frank G. A. de Bakker, Andreas Rasche, Stefano Ponte

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

Resumé

Although the literature on multi-stakeholder initiatives for sustainability has grown in recent years, it is scattered across several academic fields, making it hard to ascertain how individual disciplines, such as business ethics, can further contribute to the debate. Based on an extensive review of the literature on certification and principle-based MSIs for sustainability (n = 293 articles), we show that the scholarly debate rests on three broad themes (the “3Is”): the input into creating and governing MSIs; the institutionalization of MSIs; and the impact that relevant initiatives create. While our discussion reveals the theoretical underpinnings of the 3Is, it also shows that a number of research challenges related to business ethics remain unaddressed. We unpack these challenges and suggest how scholars can utilize theoretical insights in business ethics to push the boundaries of the field. Finally, we also discuss what business ethics research can gain from theory development in the MSI field.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftBusiness Ethics Quarterly
Vol/bind29
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)343–383
Antal sider41
ISSN1052-150X
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2019

Emneord

  • Multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs)
  • Sustainability
  • Institutionalization
  • Legitimacy
  • Business ethics
  • Management studies

Citer dette

@article{ae7cebfe82304dca84410e464eb64762,
title = "Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives on Sustainability: A Cross-Disciplinary Review and Research Agenda for Business Ethics",
abstract = "Although the literature on multi-stakeholder initiatives for sustainability has grown in recent years, it is scattered across several academic fields, making it hard to ascertain how individual disciplines, such as business ethics, can further contribute to the debate. Based on an extensive review of the literature on certification and principle-based MSIs for sustainability (n = 293 articles), we show that the scholarly debate rests on three broad themes (the “3Is”): the input into creating and governing MSIs; the institutionalization of MSIs; and the impact that relevant initiatives create. While our discussion reveals the theoretical underpinnings of the 3Is, it also shows that a number of research challenges related to business ethics remain unaddressed. We unpack these challenges and suggest how scholars can utilize theoretical insights in business ethics to push the boundaries of the field. Finally, we also discuss what business ethics research can gain from theory development in the MSI field.",
keywords = "Multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs), Sustainability, Institutionalization, Legitimacy, Business ethics, Management studies, Multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs), Sustainability, Institutionalization, Legitimacy, Business ethics, Management studies",
author = "Bakker, {Frank G. A. de} and Andreas Rasche and Stefano Ponte",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1017/beq.2019.10",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "343–383",
journal = "Business Ethics Quarterly",
issn = "1052-150X",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives on Sustainability : A Cross-Disciplinary Review and Research Agenda for Business Ethics. / Bakker, Frank G. A. de; Rasche, Andreas; Ponte, Stefano.

I: Business Ethics Quarterly, Bind 29, Nr. 3, 2019, s. 343–383.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives on Sustainability

T2 - A Cross-Disciplinary Review and Research Agenda for Business Ethics

AU - Bakker, Frank G. A. de

AU - Rasche, Andreas

AU - Ponte, Stefano

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Although the literature on multi-stakeholder initiatives for sustainability has grown in recent years, it is scattered across several academic fields, making it hard to ascertain how individual disciplines, such as business ethics, can further contribute to the debate. Based on an extensive review of the literature on certification and principle-based MSIs for sustainability (n = 293 articles), we show that the scholarly debate rests on three broad themes (the “3Is”): the input into creating and governing MSIs; the institutionalization of MSIs; and the impact that relevant initiatives create. While our discussion reveals the theoretical underpinnings of the 3Is, it also shows that a number of research challenges related to business ethics remain unaddressed. We unpack these challenges and suggest how scholars can utilize theoretical insights in business ethics to push the boundaries of the field. Finally, we also discuss what business ethics research can gain from theory development in the MSI field.

AB - Although the literature on multi-stakeholder initiatives for sustainability has grown in recent years, it is scattered across several academic fields, making it hard to ascertain how individual disciplines, such as business ethics, can further contribute to the debate. Based on an extensive review of the literature on certification and principle-based MSIs for sustainability (n = 293 articles), we show that the scholarly debate rests on three broad themes (the “3Is”): the input into creating and governing MSIs; the institutionalization of MSIs; and the impact that relevant initiatives create. While our discussion reveals the theoretical underpinnings of the 3Is, it also shows that a number of research challenges related to business ethics remain unaddressed. We unpack these challenges and suggest how scholars can utilize theoretical insights in business ethics to push the boundaries of the field. Finally, we also discuss what business ethics research can gain from theory development in the MSI field.

KW - Multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs)

KW - Sustainability

KW - Institutionalization

KW - Legitimacy

KW - Business ethics

KW - Management studies

KW - Multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs)

KW - Sustainability

KW - Institutionalization

KW - Legitimacy

KW - Business ethics

KW - Management studies

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921419504&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1017/beq.2019.10

DO - 10.1017/beq.2019.10

M3 - Review

VL - 29

SP - 343

EP - 383

JO - Business Ethics Quarterly

JF - Business Ethics Quarterly

SN - 1052-150X

IS - 3

ER -