Measuring Potential Sub-unit Efficiency to Counter the Aggregation Bias in Benchmarking

Heinz Ahn, Peter Bogetoft, Ana Lopes

Publikation: Bidrag til konferencePaperForskning

Resumé

The paper deals with benchmarking cases where highly aggregated decision making units are part of the data set. It is shown that these units – consisting of sub-units which are not further known by the evaluator – are likely to receive an unjustifiable harsh evaluation, here referred to as aggregation bias. To counter this bias, we present an approach which allows to calculate the potential sub-unit efficiency of a decision making unit by taking into account the possible impact of its sub-units' aggregation without having disaggregated sub-unit data. Based on data envelopment analysis, the approach is operationalized in several ways. Finally, we apply our method to the benchmarking model actually used by the Brazilian Electricity Regulator to measure the cost efficiency of the Brazilian distribution system operators. For this case, our results reveal that the potential effect of the aggregation bias on the operators' efficiency scores is enormous.
The paper deals with benchmarking cases where highly aggregated decision making units are part of the data set. It is shown that these units – consisting of sub-units which are not further known by the evaluator – are likely to receive an unjustifiable harsh evaluation, here referred to as aggregation bias. To counter this bias, we present an approach which allows to calculate the potential sub-unit efficiency of a decision making unit by taking into account the possible impact of its sub-units' aggregation without having disaggregated sub-unit data. Based on data envelopment analysis, the approach is operationalized in several ways. Finally, we apply our method to the benchmarking model actually used by the Brazilian Electricity Regulator to measure the cost efficiency of the Brazilian distribution system operators. For this case, our results reveal that the potential effect of the aggregation bias on the operators' efficiency scores is enormous.
SprogEngelsk
Dato2017
Antal sider41
StatusUdgivet - 2017

Emneord

  • Benchmarking
  • Data envelopment analysis
  • DEA
  • Aggregation bias
  • Potential sub-unit efficiency
  • Regulation

Citer dette

@conference{09c664c7f82d429d9ad9f73f66578fcd,
title = "Measuring Potential Sub-unit Efficiency to Counter the Aggregation Bias in Benchmarking",
abstract = "The paper deals with benchmarking cases where highly aggregated decision making units are part of the data set. It is shown that these units – consisting of sub-units which are not further known by the evaluator – are likely to receive an unjustifiable harsh evaluation, here referred to as aggregation bias. To counter this bias, we present an approach which allows to calculate the potential sub-unit efficiency of a decision making unit by taking into account the possible impact of its sub-units' aggregation without having disaggregated sub-unit data. Based on data envelopment analysis, the approach is operationalized in several ways. Finally, we apply our method to the benchmarking model actually used by the Brazilian Electricity Regulator to measure the cost efficiency of the Brazilian distribution system operators. For this case, our results reveal that the potential effect of the aggregation bias on the operators' efficiency scores is enormous.",
keywords = "Benchmarking, Data envelopment analysis, DEA, Aggregation bias, Potential sub-unit efficiency, Regulation, Benchmarking, Data envelopment analysis, DEA, Aggregation bias, Potential sub-unit efficiency, Regulation",
author = "Heinz Ahn and Peter Bogetoft and Ana Lopes",
year = "2017",
language = "English",

}

Measuring Potential Sub-unit Efficiency to Counter the Aggregation Bias in Benchmarking. / Ahn, Heinz; Bogetoft, Peter; Lopes, Ana.

2017.

Publikation: Bidrag til konferencePaperForskning

TY - CONF

T1 - Measuring Potential Sub-unit Efficiency to Counter the Aggregation Bias in Benchmarking

AU - Ahn,Heinz

AU - Bogetoft,Peter

AU - Lopes,Ana

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The paper deals with benchmarking cases where highly aggregated decision making units are part of the data set. It is shown that these units – consisting of sub-units which are not further known by the evaluator – are likely to receive an unjustifiable harsh evaluation, here referred to as aggregation bias. To counter this bias, we present an approach which allows to calculate the potential sub-unit efficiency of a decision making unit by taking into account the possible impact of its sub-units' aggregation without having disaggregated sub-unit data. Based on data envelopment analysis, the approach is operationalized in several ways. Finally, we apply our method to the benchmarking model actually used by the Brazilian Electricity Regulator to measure the cost efficiency of the Brazilian distribution system operators. For this case, our results reveal that the potential effect of the aggregation bias on the operators' efficiency scores is enormous.

AB - The paper deals with benchmarking cases where highly aggregated decision making units are part of the data set. It is shown that these units – consisting of sub-units which are not further known by the evaluator – are likely to receive an unjustifiable harsh evaluation, here referred to as aggregation bias. To counter this bias, we present an approach which allows to calculate the potential sub-unit efficiency of a decision making unit by taking into account the possible impact of its sub-units' aggregation without having disaggregated sub-unit data. Based on data envelopment analysis, the approach is operationalized in several ways. Finally, we apply our method to the benchmarking model actually used by the Brazilian Electricity Regulator to measure the cost efficiency of the Brazilian distribution system operators. For this case, our results reveal that the potential effect of the aggregation bias on the operators' efficiency scores is enormous.

KW - Benchmarking

KW - Data envelopment analysis

KW - DEA

KW - Aggregation bias

KW - Potential sub-unit efficiency

KW - Regulation

KW - Benchmarking

KW - Data envelopment analysis

KW - DEA

KW - Aggregation bias

KW - Potential sub-unit efficiency

KW - Regulation

M3 - Paper

ER -