Maturity Models Development in IS Research: A Literature Review

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKonferenceartikel i tidsskriftForskningpeer review

    Resumé

    Maturity models are widespread in IS research and in particular, IT practitioner communities. However, theoretically sound, methodologically rigorous and empirically validated maturity models are quite rare. This literature review paper focuses on the challenges faced during the development of maturity models. Specifically, it explores maturity models literature in IS and standard guidelines, if any to develop maturity models, challenges identified and solutions proposed. Our systematic literature review of IS publications revealed over hundred and fifty articles on maturity models. Extant literature reveals that researchers have primarily focused on developing new maturity models pertaining to domain-specific problems and/or new enterprise technologies. We find rampant re-use of the design structure of widely adopted models such as Nolan’s Stage of Growth Model, Crosby’s Grid, and Capability Maturity Model (CMM). Only recently have there been some research efforts to standardize maturity model development. We also identify three dominant views of maturity models and provide guidelines for various approaches of constructing maturity models with a standard vocabulary. We finally propose using process theories and configurational approaches to address the main theoretical criticisms with regard to maturity models and conclude with some recommendations for maturity model developers.
    Maturity models are widespread in IS research and in particular, IT practitioner communities. However, theoretically sound, methodologically rigorous and empirically validated maturity models are quite rare. This literature review paper focuses on the challenges faced during the development of maturity models. Specifically, it explores maturity models literature in IS and standard guidelines, if any to develop maturity models, challenges identified and solutions proposed. Our systematic literature review of IS publications revealed over hundred and fifty articles on maturity models. Extant literature reveals that researchers have primarily focused on developing new maturity models pertaining to domain-specific problems and/or new enterprise technologies. We find rampant re-use of the design structure of widely adopted models such as Nolan’s Stage of Growth Model, Crosby’s Grid, and Capability Maturity Model (CMM). Only recently have there been some research efforts to standardize maturity model development. We also identify three dominant views of maturity models and provide guidelines for various approaches of constructing maturity models with a standard vocabulary. We finally propose using process theories and configurational approaches to address the main theoretical criticisms with regard to maturity models and conclude with some recommendations for maturity model developers.

    Konference

    KonferenceThe 38th Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia. IRIS 2015
    Nummer38
    LandFinland
    ByOulu
    Periode09/08/201512/08/2015
    Internetadresse

    Emneord

    • Maturity models
    • Maturity
    • Development
    • Design
    • Process theories
    • Organizational change

    Citer dette

    @inproceedings{f7ecfa63b7ae40658736be37f125de84,
    title = "Maturity Models Development in IS Research: A Literature Review",
    abstract = "Maturity models are widespread in IS research and in particular, IT practitioner communities. However, theoretically sound, methodologically rigorous and empirically validated maturity models are quite rare. This literature review paper focuses on the challenges faced during the development of maturity models. Specifically, it explores maturity models literature in IS and standard guidelines, if any to develop maturity models, challenges identified and solutions proposed. Our systematic literature review of IS publications revealed over hundred and fifty articles on maturity models. Extant literature reveals that researchers have primarily focused on developing new maturity models pertaining to domain-specific problems and/or new enterprise technologies. We find rampant re-use of the design structure of widely adopted models such as Nolan’s Stage of Growth Model, Crosby’s Grid, and Capability Maturity Model (CMM). Only recently have there been some research efforts to standardize maturity model development. We also identify three dominant views of maturity models and provide guidelines for various approaches of constructing maturity models with a standard vocabulary. We finally propose using process theories and configurational approaches to address the main theoretical criticisms with regard to maturity models and conclude with some recommendations for maturity model developers.",
    keywords = "Maturity models, Maturity, Development, Design, Process theories, Organizational change, Maturity models, Maturity, Development, Design, Process theories, Organizational change",
    author = "Lasrado, {Lester Allan} and Ravi Vatrapu and Andersen, {Kim Normann}",
    year = "2015",
    language = "English",
    volume = "6",
    journal = "IRIS: Selected Papers of the Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia",
    issn = "1891-9863",
    publisher = "Scandinavian Chapter of the Association for Information Systems (AIS) - Scandinavian IRIS",

    }

    TY - GEN

    T1 - Maturity Models Development in IS Research

    T2 - IRIS: Selected Papers of the Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia

    AU - Lasrado,Lester Allan

    AU - Vatrapu,Ravi

    AU - Andersen,Kim Normann

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - Maturity models are widespread in IS research and in particular, IT practitioner communities. However, theoretically sound, methodologically rigorous and empirically validated maturity models are quite rare. This literature review paper focuses on the challenges faced during the development of maturity models. Specifically, it explores maturity models literature in IS and standard guidelines, if any to develop maturity models, challenges identified and solutions proposed. Our systematic literature review of IS publications revealed over hundred and fifty articles on maturity models. Extant literature reveals that researchers have primarily focused on developing new maturity models pertaining to domain-specific problems and/or new enterprise technologies. We find rampant re-use of the design structure of widely adopted models such as Nolan’s Stage of Growth Model, Crosby’s Grid, and Capability Maturity Model (CMM). Only recently have there been some research efforts to standardize maturity model development. We also identify three dominant views of maturity models and provide guidelines for various approaches of constructing maturity models with a standard vocabulary. We finally propose using process theories and configurational approaches to address the main theoretical criticisms with regard to maturity models and conclude with some recommendations for maturity model developers.

    AB - Maturity models are widespread in IS research and in particular, IT practitioner communities. However, theoretically sound, methodologically rigorous and empirically validated maturity models are quite rare. This literature review paper focuses on the challenges faced during the development of maturity models. Specifically, it explores maturity models literature in IS and standard guidelines, if any to develop maturity models, challenges identified and solutions proposed. Our systematic literature review of IS publications revealed over hundred and fifty articles on maturity models. Extant literature reveals that researchers have primarily focused on developing new maturity models pertaining to domain-specific problems and/or new enterprise technologies. We find rampant re-use of the design structure of widely adopted models such as Nolan’s Stage of Growth Model, Crosby’s Grid, and Capability Maturity Model (CMM). Only recently have there been some research efforts to standardize maturity model development. We also identify three dominant views of maturity models and provide guidelines for various approaches of constructing maturity models with a standard vocabulary. We finally propose using process theories and configurational approaches to address the main theoretical criticisms with regard to maturity models and conclude with some recommendations for maturity model developers.

    KW - Maturity models

    KW - Maturity

    KW - Development

    KW - Design

    KW - Process theories

    KW - Organizational change

    KW - Maturity models

    KW - Maturity

    KW - Development

    KW - Design

    KW - Process theories

    KW - Organizational change

    M3 - Conference article in journal

    VL - 6

    JO - IRIS: Selected Papers of the Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia

    JF - IRIS: Selected Papers of the Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia

    SN - 1891-9863

    M1 - 6

    ER -