Resumé
| Originalsprog | Engelsk |
|---|---|
| Tidsskrift | Behaviour and Information Technology |
| Vol/bind | 35 |
| Udgave nummer | 8 |
| Sider (fra-til) | 608-627 |
| ISSN | 0144-929X |
| DOI | |
| Status | Udgivet - 2016 |
Emneord
- HCI theory
- Activity theory
- Theory use
Citer dette
}
Making HCI Theory Work : An Analysis of the Use of Activity Theory in HCI Research. / Clemmensen, Torkil; Kaptelinin, Victor; Nardi, Bonnie.
I: Behaviour and Information Technology, Bind 35, Nr. 8, 2016, s. 608-627.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Making HCI Theory Work
T2 - An Analysis of the Use of Activity Theory in HCI Research
AU - Clemmensen, Torkil
AU - Kaptelinin, Victor
AU - Nardi, Bonnie
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - This paper reports a study of the use of activity theory in human–computer interaction (HCI) research. We analyse activity theory in HCI since its first appearance about 25 years ago. Through an analysis and meta-synthesis of 109 selected HCI activity theory papers, we created a taxonomy of 5 different ways of using activity theory: (1) analysing unique features, principles, and problematic aspects of the theory; (2) identifying domain-specific requirements for new theoretical tools; (3) developing new conceptual accounts of issues in the field of HCI; (4) guiding and supporting empirical analyses of HCI phenomena; and (5) providing new design illustrations, claims, and guidelines. We conclude that HCI researchers are not only users of imported theory, but also theory-makers who adapt and develop theory for different purposes.
AB - This paper reports a study of the use of activity theory in human–computer interaction (HCI) research. We analyse activity theory in HCI since its first appearance about 25 years ago. Through an analysis and meta-synthesis of 109 selected HCI activity theory papers, we created a taxonomy of 5 different ways of using activity theory: (1) analysing unique features, principles, and problematic aspects of the theory; (2) identifying domain-specific requirements for new theoretical tools; (3) developing new conceptual accounts of issues in the field of HCI; (4) guiding and supporting empirical analyses of HCI phenomena; and (5) providing new design illustrations, claims, and guidelines. We conclude that HCI researchers are not only users of imported theory, but also theory-makers who adapt and develop theory for different purposes.
KW - HCI theory
KW - Activity theory
KW - Theory use
KW - HCI theory
KW - Activity theory
KW - Theory use
UR - http://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954925254137
U2 - 10.1080/0144929X.2016.1175507
DO - 10.1080/0144929X.2016.1175507
M3 - Journal article
VL - 35
SP - 608
EP - 627
JO - Behaviour and Information Technology
JF - Behaviour and Information Technology
SN - 0144-929X
IS - 8
ER -