Making HCI Theory Work

An Analysis of the Use of Activity Theory in HCI Research

Torkil Clemmensen, Victor Kaptelinin, Bonnie Nardi

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    867 Downloads (Pure)

    Resumé

    This paper reports a study of the use of activity theory in human–computer interaction (HCI) research. We analyse activity theory in HCI since its first appearance about 25 years ago. Through an analysis and meta-synthesis of 109 selected HCI activity theory papers, we created a taxonomy of 5 different ways of using activity theory: (1) analysing unique features, principles, and problematic aspects of the theory; (2) identifying domain-specific requirements for new theoretical tools; (3) developing new conceptual accounts of issues in the field of HCI; (4) guiding and supporting empirical analyses of HCI phenomena; and (5) providing new design illustrations, claims, and guidelines. We conclude that HCI researchers are not only users of imported theory, but also theory-makers who adapt and develop theory for different purposes.
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    TidsskriftBehaviour and Information Technology
    Vol/bind35
    Udgave nummer8
    Sider (fra-til)608-627
    ISSN0144-929X
    DOI
    StatusUdgivet - 2016

    Emneord

    • HCI theory
    • Activity theory
    • Theory use

    Citer dette

    @article{c0922fd2851245a4a6b6e2261379b10f,
    title = "Making HCI Theory Work: An Analysis of the Use of Activity Theory in HCI Research",
    abstract = "This paper reports a study of the use of activity theory in human–computer interaction (HCI) research. We analyse activity theory in HCI since its first appearance about 25 years ago. Through an analysis and meta-synthesis of 109 selected HCI activity theory papers, we created a taxonomy of 5 different ways of using activity theory: (1) analysing unique features, principles, and problematic aspects of the theory; (2) identifying domain-specific requirements for new theoretical tools; (3) developing new conceptual accounts of issues in the field of HCI; (4) guiding and supporting empirical analyses of HCI phenomena; and (5) providing new design illustrations, claims, and guidelines. We conclude that HCI researchers are not only users of imported theory, but also theory-makers who adapt and develop theory for different purposes.",
    keywords = "HCI theory, Activity theory, Theory use, HCI theory, Activity theory, Theory use",
    author = "Torkil Clemmensen and Victor Kaptelinin and Bonnie Nardi",
    year = "2016",
    doi = "10.1080/0144929X.2016.1175507",
    language = "English",
    volume = "35",
    pages = "608--627",
    journal = "Behaviour and Information Technology",
    issn = "0144-929X",
    publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
    number = "8",

    }

    Making HCI Theory Work : An Analysis of the Use of Activity Theory in HCI Research. / Clemmensen, Torkil; Kaptelinin, Victor; Nardi, Bonnie.

    I: Behaviour and Information Technology, Bind 35, Nr. 8, 2016, s. 608-627.

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Making HCI Theory Work

    T2 - An Analysis of the Use of Activity Theory in HCI Research

    AU - Clemmensen, Torkil

    AU - Kaptelinin, Victor

    AU - Nardi, Bonnie

    PY - 2016

    Y1 - 2016

    N2 - This paper reports a study of the use of activity theory in human–computer interaction (HCI) research. We analyse activity theory in HCI since its first appearance about 25 years ago. Through an analysis and meta-synthesis of 109 selected HCI activity theory papers, we created a taxonomy of 5 different ways of using activity theory: (1) analysing unique features, principles, and problematic aspects of the theory; (2) identifying domain-specific requirements for new theoretical tools; (3) developing new conceptual accounts of issues in the field of HCI; (4) guiding and supporting empirical analyses of HCI phenomena; and (5) providing new design illustrations, claims, and guidelines. We conclude that HCI researchers are not only users of imported theory, but also theory-makers who adapt and develop theory for different purposes.

    AB - This paper reports a study of the use of activity theory in human–computer interaction (HCI) research. We analyse activity theory in HCI since its first appearance about 25 years ago. Through an analysis and meta-synthesis of 109 selected HCI activity theory papers, we created a taxonomy of 5 different ways of using activity theory: (1) analysing unique features, principles, and problematic aspects of the theory; (2) identifying domain-specific requirements for new theoretical tools; (3) developing new conceptual accounts of issues in the field of HCI; (4) guiding and supporting empirical analyses of HCI phenomena; and (5) providing new design illustrations, claims, and guidelines. We conclude that HCI researchers are not only users of imported theory, but also theory-makers who adapt and develop theory for different purposes.

    KW - HCI theory

    KW - Activity theory

    KW - Theory use

    KW - HCI theory

    KW - Activity theory

    KW - Theory use

    UR - http://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954925254137

    U2 - 10.1080/0144929X.2016.1175507

    DO - 10.1080/0144929X.2016.1175507

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 35

    SP - 608

    EP - 627

    JO - Behaviour and Information Technology

    JF - Behaviour and Information Technology

    SN - 0144-929X

    IS - 8

    ER -