Law’s Lolita Paradox: Translating ‘Childhood’ in Statutory Rape Jurisprudence

Luisa Teresa Hedler Ferreira*, Maj Grasten

*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    20 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstrakt

    This article addresses how normative views about ‘childhood’ are translated into statutory rape legislation and court judgments at the highest legal level in Brazil, in the Federal Supreme Court. The article draws on literature on the sociology of childhood to trace how courts translate societal narratives in the construction of agency, vulnerability and victimhood with regard to children and sexuality. Analysing historical and contemporary statutory rape legislation and Federal Supreme Court decisions over a 20-year period, we argue that the legal subjecthood of child victims of sexual crimes is constructed at the intersection of prevailing norms in society about childhood and moralising discourses about women’s sexuality. Deviating from norms about childhood results in the prominence of women’s sexuality and sexual desire in legal and judicial argumentation, situating children in a legal-semantic space in which they are simultaneously denied the agency that characterises adulthood and the special protection that compensates for this lack of agency in childhood protection laws. We refer to this legal situation and friction as the ‘Lolita paradox’ of statutory rape jurisprudence.
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    TidsskriftAustralian Feminist Law Journal
    Vol/bind47
    Udgave nummer2
    Sider (fra-til)229-249
    Antal sider21
    ISSN1320-0968
    DOI
    StatusUdgivet - 2021

    Bibliografisk note

    Published online: 16 August 2022.

    Citationsformater