Abstract
Knowledge governance (KG) aims at strategically influencing knowledge processes by implementing governance mechanisms. Little is known about whether, how, or why such strategies differ among firms. We utilize a large-scale empirical study of 20 organizations to develop a typology of KG strategies in project-based organizations; we then explore how these strategies emerge and affect organizational knowledge processes. Six strategies are identified: Protector, Deliverer, Polisher, Explorer, Supporter, and Analyzer. This paper posits a multi-level categorization model to facilitate comparisons among KG strategies. We uncover three main drivers of organizations' chosen knowledge governance strategies—namely, attitudes about humans, knowledge, and knowledge control.
| Originalsprog | Engelsk |
|---|---|
| Tidsskrift | Long Range Planning |
| Vol/bind | 49 |
| Udgave nummer | 6 |
| Sider (fra-til) | 648-660 |
| Antal sider | 13 |
| ISSN | 0024-6301 |
| DOI | |
| Status | Udgivet - dec. 2016 |
Citationsformater
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver