Knowledge Assessment in the Agora

Lars Frode Frederiksen, Finn Hansson, Søren Barlebo Rasmussen

Publikation: Working paperForskning

Resumé

The internal scientific evaluation of knowledge claims done by peer review is todayhas for the last 20 years been supplemented by new methods of knowledge assessment. These methods are usually taken from other sectors such as the public administration and the corporate sector. Because of their different backgrounds compared to the peer review method, it is necessary to critically examine them in relation to assessment of quality. But this also calls for a new understanding of science and knowledge. The article starts by briefly explaining this new understanding, before going into more details on the new methods of knowledge assessment and the perspectives behind them.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Udgivelses stedCopenhagen
UdgiverDepartment of Management, Politics and Philosophy, CBS
Antal sider16
ISBN (Trykt)8791181011
StatusUdgivet - 2001
NavnMPP Working Paper
Nummer17/2000

Citer dette

Frederiksen, L. F., Hansson, F., & Rasmussen, S. B. (2001). Knowledge Assessment in the Agora. Copenhagen: Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy, CBS. MPP Working Paper, Nr. 17/2000
Frederiksen, Lars Frode ; Hansson, Finn ; Rasmussen, Søren Barlebo. / Knowledge Assessment in the Agora. Copenhagen : Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy, CBS, 2001. (MPP Working Paper; Nr. 17/2000).
@techreport{e81d1f4a47634540abbba1f70a92b2a1,
title = "Knowledge Assessment in the Agora",
abstract = "The internal scientific evaluation of knowledge claims done by peer review is todayhas for the last 20 years been supplemented by new methods of knowledge assessment. These methods are usually taken from other sectors such as the public administration and the corporate sector. Because of their different backgrounds compared to the peer review method, it is necessary to critically examine them in relation to assessment of quality. But this also calls for a new understanding of science and knowledge. The article starts by briefly explaining this new understanding, before going into more details on the new methods of knowledge assessment and the perspectives behind them.",
keywords = "The agora, The Triple Helix, Research evaluation, Research quality, A new understanding of science, Universities, industry",
author = "Frederiksen, {Lars Frode} and Finn Hansson and Rasmussen, {S{\o}ren Barlebo}",
year = "2001",
language = "English",
isbn = "8791181011",
series = "MPP Working Paper",
publisher = "Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy, CBS",
number = "17/2000",
address = "Denmark",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy, CBS",

}

Frederiksen, LF, Hansson, F & Rasmussen, SB 2001 'Knowledge Assessment in the Agora' Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy, CBS, Copenhagen.

Knowledge Assessment in the Agora. / Frederiksen, Lars Frode; Hansson, Finn; Rasmussen, Søren Barlebo.

Copenhagen : Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy, CBS, 2001.

Publikation: Working paperForskning

TY - UNPB

T1 - Knowledge Assessment in the Agora

AU - Frederiksen, Lars Frode

AU - Hansson, Finn

AU - Rasmussen, Søren Barlebo

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - The internal scientific evaluation of knowledge claims done by peer review is todayhas for the last 20 years been supplemented by new methods of knowledge assessment. These methods are usually taken from other sectors such as the public administration and the corporate sector. Because of their different backgrounds compared to the peer review method, it is necessary to critically examine them in relation to assessment of quality. But this also calls for a new understanding of science and knowledge. The article starts by briefly explaining this new understanding, before going into more details on the new methods of knowledge assessment and the perspectives behind them.

AB - The internal scientific evaluation of knowledge claims done by peer review is todayhas for the last 20 years been supplemented by new methods of knowledge assessment. These methods are usually taken from other sectors such as the public administration and the corporate sector. Because of their different backgrounds compared to the peer review method, it is necessary to critically examine them in relation to assessment of quality. But this also calls for a new understanding of science and knowledge. The article starts by briefly explaining this new understanding, before going into more details on the new methods of knowledge assessment and the perspectives behind them.

KW - The agora

KW - The Triple Helix

KW - Research evaluation

KW - Research quality

KW - A new understanding of science

KW - Universities

KW - industry

M3 - Working paper

SN - 8791181011

T3 - MPP Working Paper

BT - Knowledge Assessment in the Agora

PB - Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy, CBS

CY - Copenhagen

ER -

Frederiksen LF, Hansson F, Rasmussen SB. Knowledge Assessment in the Agora. Copenhagen: Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy, CBS. 2001.