Keep Searching and You’ll Find

What Do We Know About Variety Creation Through Firms’ Search Activities for Innovation?

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    Resumé

    This article critically reviews and synthesizes the contributions found in theoretical and empirical studies of firm-level innovation search processes. It explores the advantages and disadvantages of local and non-local search, discusses organizational responses, and identifies potential exogenous triggers for different kinds of search. It argues that the initial focus on local search was a consequence, in part, of the attention in evolutionary economics to path-dependent behavior, but that as localized behavior was increasingly accepted as the standard mode, studies began to question whether local search was the best solution in all cases. More recently, the literature has focused on the trade-offs being created, by firms having to balance local and non-local search. We account also for the apparent “variety paradox” in the stylized fact that organizations within the same industry tend to follow different search strategies, but end up with very similar technological profiles in fast-growing technologies. The article concludes by highlighting what we have learnt from the literature and suggesting some new avenues for research.
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    TidsskriftIndustrial and Corporate Change
    Vol/bind21
    Udgave nummer5
    Sider (fra-til)1181-1220
    ISSN0960-6491
    DOI
    StatusUdgivet - 2012

    Citer dette

    @article{1d9ecbc149414bbcbc571203188a7fc3,
    title = "Keep Searching and You’ll Find: What Do We Know About Variety Creation Through Firms’ Search Activities for Innovation?",
    abstract = "This article critically reviews and synthesizes the contributions found in theoretical and empirical studies of firm-level innovation search processes. It explores the advantages and disadvantages of local and non-local search, discusses organizational responses, and identifies potential exogenous triggers for different kinds of search. It argues that the initial focus on local search was a consequence, in part, of the attention in evolutionary economics to path-dependent behavior, but that as localized behavior was increasingly accepted as the standard mode, studies began to question whether local search was the best solution in all cases. More recently, the literature has focused on the trade-offs being created, by firms having to balance local and non-local search. We account also for the apparent “variety paradox” in the stylized fact that organizations within the same industry tend to follow different search strategies, but end up with very similar technological profiles in fast-growing technologies. The article concludes by highlighting what we have learnt from the literature and suggesting some new avenues for research.",
    author = "Keld Laursen",
    year = "2012",
    doi = "10.1093/icc/dts025",
    language = "English",
    volume = "21",
    pages = "1181--1220",
    journal = "Industrial and Corporate Change",
    issn = "0960-6491",
    publisher = "Oxford University Press",
    number = "5",

    }

    Keep Searching and You’ll Find : What Do We Know About Variety Creation Through Firms’ Search Activities for Innovation? / Laursen, Keld.

    I: Industrial and Corporate Change, Bind 21, Nr. 5, 2012, s. 1181-1220.

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Keep Searching and You’ll Find

    T2 - What Do We Know About Variety Creation Through Firms’ Search Activities for Innovation?

    AU - Laursen, Keld

    PY - 2012

    Y1 - 2012

    N2 - This article critically reviews and synthesizes the contributions found in theoretical and empirical studies of firm-level innovation search processes. It explores the advantages and disadvantages of local and non-local search, discusses organizational responses, and identifies potential exogenous triggers for different kinds of search. It argues that the initial focus on local search was a consequence, in part, of the attention in evolutionary economics to path-dependent behavior, but that as localized behavior was increasingly accepted as the standard mode, studies began to question whether local search was the best solution in all cases. More recently, the literature has focused on the trade-offs being created, by firms having to balance local and non-local search. We account also for the apparent “variety paradox” in the stylized fact that organizations within the same industry tend to follow different search strategies, but end up with very similar technological profiles in fast-growing technologies. The article concludes by highlighting what we have learnt from the literature and suggesting some new avenues for research.

    AB - This article critically reviews and synthesizes the contributions found in theoretical and empirical studies of firm-level innovation search processes. It explores the advantages and disadvantages of local and non-local search, discusses organizational responses, and identifies potential exogenous triggers for different kinds of search. It argues that the initial focus on local search was a consequence, in part, of the attention in evolutionary economics to path-dependent behavior, but that as localized behavior was increasingly accepted as the standard mode, studies began to question whether local search was the best solution in all cases. More recently, the literature has focused on the trade-offs being created, by firms having to balance local and non-local search. We account also for the apparent “variety paradox” in the stylized fact that organizations within the same industry tend to follow different search strategies, but end up with very similar technological profiles in fast-growing technologies. The article concludes by highlighting what we have learnt from the literature and suggesting some new avenues for research.

    U2 - 10.1093/icc/dts025

    DO - 10.1093/icc/dts025

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 21

    SP - 1181

    EP - 1220

    JO - Industrial and Corporate Change

    JF - Industrial and Corporate Change

    SN - 0960-6491

    IS - 5

    ER -