Just for Fun!

How Experimental Spaces Stimulate Innovation in Institutionalized Fields

Melodie Cartel, Eva Boxenbaum, Franck Aggeri

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

32 Downloads (Pure)

Resumé

This paper examines the role of experimental spaces as a source of institutional innovation. We investigate the case of an experimental space that was instrumental in initiating the institutionalization of the European carbon market. Our findings highlight the key role of emotions in the simultaneous distancing from institutionalized patterns and engagement in an alternative action model. We subsequently develop a process model of how experimental spaces initiate institutional innovation in institutionalized fields. This model comprises three forms of institutional work. As previously established, boundary work consists in delineating the space from the field, hence mitigating external institutional pressures. We argue that two additional forms of institutional work are required when field conditions are unconducive to institutional innovation. Distancing work consists in designing rules and procedures that alleviate space members’ deep-seated attachment to the field’s dominant models. Anchoring work refers to the design of rules and procedures that connect the experimental space and the solution developed inside it to the field, hence facilitating its broader diffusion. We conclude with a discussion of how the design of experimental spaces and the deliberate use of emotions open new doors for generating institutional innovation.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftOrganization Studies
Vol/bind40
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)65-92
Antal sider28
ISSN0170-8406
DOI
StatusUdgivet - jan. 2019

Bibliografisk note

Published online: 11. January 2018

Emneord

  • Anchoring work
  • Boundary work
  • Distancing work
  • Positive emotions
  • Emotional facilitators
  • Emotional inhibitors
  • Experimental spaces
  • Institutional innovation
  • Institutional work

Citer dette

@article{8568b01edae94614ab90acb3432751aa,
title = "Just for Fun!: How Experimental Spaces Stimulate Innovation in Institutionalized Fields",
abstract = "This paper examines the role of experimental spaces as a source of institutional innovation. We investigate the case of an experimental space that was instrumental in initiating the institutionalization of the European carbon market. Our findings highlight the key role of emotions in the simultaneous distancing from institutionalized patterns and engagement in an alternative action model. We subsequently develop a process model of how experimental spaces initiate institutional innovation in institutionalized fields. This model comprises three forms of institutional work. As previously established, boundary work consists in delineating the space from the field, hence mitigating external institutional pressures. We argue that two additional forms of institutional work are required when field conditions are unconducive to institutional innovation. Distancing work consists in designing rules and procedures that alleviate space members’ deep-seated attachment to the field’s dominant models. Anchoring work refers to the design of rules and procedures that connect the experimental space and the solution developed inside it to the field, hence facilitating its broader diffusion. We conclude with a discussion of how the design of experimental spaces and the deliberate use of emotions open new doors for generating institutional innovation.",
keywords = "Anchoring work, Boundary work, Distancing work, Positive emotions, Emotional facilitators, Emotional inhibitors, Experimental spaces, Institutional innovation, Institutional work, Anchoring work, Boundary work, Distancing work, Positive emotions, Emotional facilitators, Emotional inhibitors, Experimental spaces, Institutional innovation, Institutional work",
author = "Melodie Cartel and Eva Boxenbaum and Franck Aggeri",
note = "Published online: 11. January 2018",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0170840617736937",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "65--92",
journal = "Organization Studies",
issn = "0170-8406",
publisher = "Sage Publications Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Just for Fun! How Experimental Spaces Stimulate Innovation in Institutionalized Fields. / Cartel, Melodie; Boxenbaum, Eva; Aggeri, Franck.

I: Organization Studies, Bind 40, Nr. 1, 01.2019, s. 65-92.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Just for Fun!

T2 - How Experimental Spaces Stimulate Innovation in Institutionalized Fields

AU - Cartel, Melodie

AU - Boxenbaum, Eva

AU - Aggeri, Franck

N1 - Published online: 11. January 2018

PY - 2019/1

Y1 - 2019/1

N2 - This paper examines the role of experimental spaces as a source of institutional innovation. We investigate the case of an experimental space that was instrumental in initiating the institutionalization of the European carbon market. Our findings highlight the key role of emotions in the simultaneous distancing from institutionalized patterns and engagement in an alternative action model. We subsequently develop a process model of how experimental spaces initiate institutional innovation in institutionalized fields. This model comprises three forms of institutional work. As previously established, boundary work consists in delineating the space from the field, hence mitigating external institutional pressures. We argue that two additional forms of institutional work are required when field conditions are unconducive to institutional innovation. Distancing work consists in designing rules and procedures that alleviate space members’ deep-seated attachment to the field’s dominant models. Anchoring work refers to the design of rules and procedures that connect the experimental space and the solution developed inside it to the field, hence facilitating its broader diffusion. We conclude with a discussion of how the design of experimental spaces and the deliberate use of emotions open new doors for generating institutional innovation.

AB - This paper examines the role of experimental spaces as a source of institutional innovation. We investigate the case of an experimental space that was instrumental in initiating the institutionalization of the European carbon market. Our findings highlight the key role of emotions in the simultaneous distancing from institutionalized patterns and engagement in an alternative action model. We subsequently develop a process model of how experimental spaces initiate institutional innovation in institutionalized fields. This model comprises three forms of institutional work. As previously established, boundary work consists in delineating the space from the field, hence mitigating external institutional pressures. We argue that two additional forms of institutional work are required when field conditions are unconducive to institutional innovation. Distancing work consists in designing rules and procedures that alleviate space members’ deep-seated attachment to the field’s dominant models. Anchoring work refers to the design of rules and procedures that connect the experimental space and the solution developed inside it to the field, hence facilitating its broader diffusion. We conclude with a discussion of how the design of experimental spaces and the deliberate use of emotions open new doors for generating institutional innovation.

KW - Anchoring work

KW - Boundary work

KW - Distancing work

KW - Positive emotions

KW - Emotional facilitators

KW - Emotional inhibitors

KW - Experimental spaces

KW - Institutional innovation

KW - Institutional work

KW - Anchoring work

KW - Boundary work

KW - Distancing work

KW - Positive emotions

KW - Emotional facilitators

KW - Emotional inhibitors

KW - Experimental spaces

KW - Institutional innovation

KW - Institutional work

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921376726

U2 - 10.1177/0170840617736937

DO - 10.1177/0170840617736937

M3 - Journal article

VL - 40

SP - 65

EP - 92

JO - Organization Studies

JF - Organization Studies

SN - 0170-8406

IS - 1

ER -