‘It's Capitalism on Coke!’: From Temporary to Permanent Liminality in Organization Studies

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

In recent years, organization studies have become increasingly aware of the concept of liminality. In our review and critique of this reception of liminality in organization studies, we emphasize that liminality involves a fundamental suspension of ordinary social structures. Although the prevailing use of the concept in anthropology as well as in organization studies has conceptualized liminality as a temporary state, we focus on permanent liminality. Yet the idea of permanent liminality leads to an inevitable paradox, because the concept, by definition, is a temporary state. Conceptualizing liminality as a constant state of social limbo, we show that the paradox in permanent liminality stems from the impossibility of drawing clear distinctions between different social spheres, especially as they apply to modern work–life. Examining a case study about a management consultant, we illustrate the paradox of liminality in terms of a zone of indistinction between work and life as it is reflected in an empirical self-narrative about a consultancy ‘lifestyle’. We further link these findings to a possible transition from disciplinary societies to societies of control.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftCulture and Organization
Vol/bind21
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)321-337
Antal sider17
ISSN1475-9551
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2015

Emneord

  • Liminality
  • Management Consultancy
  • Zone of indistinction
  • Societies of control

Citer dette

@article{1578d8179de64518954dccf61e004c28,
title = "‘It's Capitalism on Coke!’:: From Temporary to Permanent Liminality in Organization Studies",
abstract = "In recent years, organization studies have become increasingly aware of the concept of liminality. In our review and critique of this reception of liminality in organization studies, we emphasize that liminality involves a fundamental suspension of ordinary social structures. Although the prevailing use of the concept in anthropology as well as in organization studies has conceptualized liminality as a temporary state, we focus on permanent liminality. Yet the idea of permanent liminality leads to an inevitable paradox, because the concept, by definition, is a temporary state. Conceptualizing liminality as a constant state of social limbo, we show that the paradox in permanent liminality stems from the impossibility of drawing clear distinctions between different social spheres, especially as they apply to modern work–life. Examining a case study about a management consultant, we illustrate the paradox of liminality in terms of a zone of indistinction between work and life as it is reflected in an empirical self-narrative about a consultancy ‘lifestyle’. We further link these findings to a possible transition from disciplinary societies to societies of control.",
keywords = "Liminality, Management Consultancy, Zone of indistinction, Societies of control",
author = "Johnsen, {Christian Garmann} and S{\o}rensen, {Bent Meier}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/14759551.2014.901326",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "321--337",
journal = "Culture and Organization",
issn = "1475-9551",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

‘It's Capitalism on Coke!’: From Temporary to Permanent Liminality in Organization Studies. / Johnsen, Christian Garmann; Sørensen, Bent Meier.

I: Culture and Organization, Bind 21, Nr. 4, 2015, s. 321-337.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘It's Capitalism on Coke!’:

T2 - From Temporary to Permanent Liminality in Organization Studies

AU - Johnsen, Christian Garmann

AU - Sørensen, Bent Meier

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - In recent years, organization studies have become increasingly aware of the concept of liminality. In our review and critique of this reception of liminality in organization studies, we emphasize that liminality involves a fundamental suspension of ordinary social structures. Although the prevailing use of the concept in anthropology as well as in organization studies has conceptualized liminality as a temporary state, we focus on permanent liminality. Yet the idea of permanent liminality leads to an inevitable paradox, because the concept, by definition, is a temporary state. Conceptualizing liminality as a constant state of social limbo, we show that the paradox in permanent liminality stems from the impossibility of drawing clear distinctions between different social spheres, especially as they apply to modern work–life. Examining a case study about a management consultant, we illustrate the paradox of liminality in terms of a zone of indistinction between work and life as it is reflected in an empirical self-narrative about a consultancy ‘lifestyle’. We further link these findings to a possible transition from disciplinary societies to societies of control.

AB - In recent years, organization studies have become increasingly aware of the concept of liminality. In our review and critique of this reception of liminality in organization studies, we emphasize that liminality involves a fundamental suspension of ordinary social structures. Although the prevailing use of the concept in anthropology as well as in organization studies has conceptualized liminality as a temporary state, we focus on permanent liminality. Yet the idea of permanent liminality leads to an inevitable paradox, because the concept, by definition, is a temporary state. Conceptualizing liminality as a constant state of social limbo, we show that the paradox in permanent liminality stems from the impossibility of drawing clear distinctions between different social spheres, especially as they apply to modern work–life. Examining a case study about a management consultant, we illustrate the paradox of liminality in terms of a zone of indistinction between work and life as it is reflected in an empirical self-narrative about a consultancy ‘lifestyle’. We further link these findings to a possible transition from disciplinary societies to societies of control.

KW - Liminality

KW - Management Consultancy

KW - Zone of indistinction

KW - Societies of control

UR - http://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=111032821283018&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1080/14759551.2014.901326

DO - 10.1080/14759551.2014.901326

M3 - Journal article

VL - 21

SP - 321

EP - 337

JO - Culture and Organization

JF - Culture and Organization

SN - 1475-9551

IS - 4

ER -