It is all in the word: Constructivism and constitutionism

Sine Nørholm Just, Jens Lautrup Nørgaard

    Publikation: Working paperForskning

    3 Downloads (Pure)

    Resumé

    Constructivism is one of the most successful paradigms within the social and human sciences at the beginning of the new millennium. But it is a very disputed paradigm, and critical accounts of this domi-nating -ism are proliferating. Recently, the critics have become more visible, and the paradigm is now challenged seriously. Being critics of constructivism ourselves we welcome this tendency. How-ever, we are also critical of the critique since it tends to dichotomise the debate to an unnecessary degree, and, at times, does not admit the very fertile insights that are also part of the constructivist ap-proach. In the following we shall join the critique, but in doing so we will point towards a moderated view of the ways in which the world becomes meaningful to us. Our aim is to sketch out a theoretical perspective that benefits from both the insights of constructivism and its critics, and thereby is able to realise the full explanatory potential of both.
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    Udgivelses stedKøbenhavn
    Antal sider23
    StatusUdgivet - 2004

    Emneord

    • Socialkonstruktivisme
    • Konstruktivisme

    Citer dette

    @techreport{90f2cf80c02011db9769000ea68e967b,
    title = "It is all in the word: Constructivism and constitutionism",
    abstract = "Constructivism is one of the most successful paradigms within the social and human sciences at the beginning of the new millennium. But it is a very disputed paradigm, and critical accounts of this domi-nating -ism are proliferating. Recently, the critics have become more visible, and the paradigm is now challenged seriously. Being critics of constructivism ourselves we welcome this tendency. How-ever, we are also critical of the critique since it tends to dichotomise the debate to an unnecessary degree, and, at times, does not admit the very fertile insights that are also part of the constructivist ap-proach. In the following we shall join the critique, but in doing so we will point towards a moderated view of the ways in which the world becomes meaningful to us. Our aim is to sketch out a theoretical perspective that benefits from both the insights of constructivism and its critics, and thereby is able to realise the full explanatory potential of both.",
    keywords = "Socialkonstruktivisme, Konstruktivisme",
    author = "Just, {Sine N{\o}rholm} and N{\o}rgaard, {Jens Lautrup}",
    year = "2004",
    language = "English",
    type = "WorkingPaper",

    }

    It is all in the word : Constructivism and constitutionism. / Just, Sine Nørholm; Nørgaard, Jens Lautrup.

    København, 2004.

    Publikation: Working paperForskning

    TY - UNPB

    T1 - It is all in the word

    T2 - Constructivism and constitutionism

    AU - Just, Sine Nørholm

    AU - Nørgaard, Jens Lautrup

    PY - 2004

    Y1 - 2004

    N2 - Constructivism is one of the most successful paradigms within the social and human sciences at the beginning of the new millennium. But it is a very disputed paradigm, and critical accounts of this domi-nating -ism are proliferating. Recently, the critics have become more visible, and the paradigm is now challenged seriously. Being critics of constructivism ourselves we welcome this tendency. How-ever, we are also critical of the critique since it tends to dichotomise the debate to an unnecessary degree, and, at times, does not admit the very fertile insights that are also part of the constructivist ap-proach. In the following we shall join the critique, but in doing so we will point towards a moderated view of the ways in which the world becomes meaningful to us. Our aim is to sketch out a theoretical perspective that benefits from both the insights of constructivism and its critics, and thereby is able to realise the full explanatory potential of both.

    AB - Constructivism is one of the most successful paradigms within the social and human sciences at the beginning of the new millennium. But it is a very disputed paradigm, and critical accounts of this domi-nating -ism are proliferating. Recently, the critics have become more visible, and the paradigm is now challenged seriously. Being critics of constructivism ourselves we welcome this tendency. How-ever, we are also critical of the critique since it tends to dichotomise the debate to an unnecessary degree, and, at times, does not admit the very fertile insights that are also part of the constructivist ap-proach. In the following we shall join the critique, but in doing so we will point towards a moderated view of the ways in which the world becomes meaningful to us. Our aim is to sketch out a theoretical perspective that benefits from both the insights of constructivism and its critics, and thereby is able to realise the full explanatory potential of both.

    KW - Socialkonstruktivisme

    KW - Konstruktivisme

    M3 - Working paper

    BT - It is all in the word

    CY - København

    ER -