Invasion From Within: Ideas, Power, and the Transmission of Institutional Logics Between Policy Domains

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

How do institutional logics travel within a political economy? Employing insights from historical and ideational institutionalist theory, this article offers a novel understanding of change dynamics as driven by actors’ creation of institutional interlinkages. It develops the causal mechanism of “invasion from within,” consisting of a three-stage process: the progressive weakening of a policy paradigm within one institutional site coinciding with a strengthening of the policy paradigm in another; the building of a coalition within the exporting field; and the use of framing strategies to “localize” adjacent logics of action and delegitimize adversarial coalitions. The analytical purchase of the argument is corroborated through process tracing of the German pension paradigm shift during the 1990s, showing that ideas about private capital formation developed in finance were redirected toward old-age provision and strategically transferred to the pension arena by a coalition of actors from the German finance domain.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftComparative Political Studies
Vol/bind52
Udgave nummer9
Sider (fra-til)1328–1363
Antal sider36
ISSN0010-4140
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2019

Emneord

  • Financialization
  • Pension
  • Germany
  • Ideas
  • Institutions

Citer dette

@article{9df2dcbcb4e84977abbc3431efbb3798,
title = "Invasion From Within: Ideas, Power, and the Transmission of Institutional Logics Between Policy Domains",
abstract = "How do institutional logics travel within a political economy? Employing insights from historical and ideational institutionalist theory, this article offers a novel understanding of change dynamics as driven by actors’ creation of institutional interlinkages. It develops the causal mechanism of “invasion from within,” consisting of a three-stage process: the progressive weakening of a policy paradigm within one institutional site coinciding with a strengthening of the policy paradigm in another; the building of a coalition within the exporting field; and the use of framing strategies to “localize” adjacent logics of action and delegitimize adversarial coalitions. The analytical purchase of the argument is corroborated through process tracing of the German pension paradigm shift during the 1990s, showing that ideas about private capital formation developed in finance were redirected toward old-age provision and strategically transferred to the pension arena by a coalition of actors from the German finance domain.",
keywords = "Financialization, Pension, Germany, Ideas, Institutions, Financialization, Pension, Germany, Ideas, Institutions",
author = "Carstensen, {Martin B.} and Nils R{\"o}per",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1177/0010414019830713",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "1328–1363",
journal = "Comparative Political Studies",
issn = "0010-4140",
publisher = "Sage Publications, Inc.",
number = "9",

}

Invasion From Within : Ideas, Power, and the Transmission of Institutional Logics Between Policy Domains. / Carstensen, Martin B.; Röper, Nils.

I: Comparative Political Studies, Bind 52, Nr. 9, 2019, s. 1328–1363.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Invasion From Within

T2 - Ideas, Power, and the Transmission of Institutional Logics Between Policy Domains

AU - Carstensen, Martin B.

AU - Röper, Nils

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - How do institutional logics travel within a political economy? Employing insights from historical and ideational institutionalist theory, this article offers a novel understanding of change dynamics as driven by actors’ creation of institutional interlinkages. It develops the causal mechanism of “invasion from within,” consisting of a three-stage process: the progressive weakening of a policy paradigm within one institutional site coinciding with a strengthening of the policy paradigm in another; the building of a coalition within the exporting field; and the use of framing strategies to “localize” adjacent logics of action and delegitimize adversarial coalitions. The analytical purchase of the argument is corroborated through process tracing of the German pension paradigm shift during the 1990s, showing that ideas about private capital formation developed in finance were redirected toward old-age provision and strategically transferred to the pension arena by a coalition of actors from the German finance domain.

AB - How do institutional logics travel within a political economy? Employing insights from historical and ideational institutionalist theory, this article offers a novel understanding of change dynamics as driven by actors’ creation of institutional interlinkages. It develops the causal mechanism of “invasion from within,” consisting of a three-stage process: the progressive weakening of a policy paradigm within one institutional site coinciding with a strengthening of the policy paradigm in another; the building of a coalition within the exporting field; and the use of framing strategies to “localize” adjacent logics of action and delegitimize adversarial coalitions. The analytical purchase of the argument is corroborated through process tracing of the German pension paradigm shift during the 1990s, showing that ideas about private capital formation developed in finance were redirected toward old-age provision and strategically transferred to the pension arena by a coalition of actors from the German finance domain.

KW - Financialization

KW - Pension

KW - Germany

KW - Ideas

KW - Institutions

KW - Financialization

KW - Pension

KW - Germany

KW - Ideas

KW - Institutions

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954925392320&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1177/0010414019830713

DO - 10.1177/0010414019830713

M3 - Journal article

VL - 52

SP - 1328

EP - 1363

JO - Comparative Political Studies

JF - Comparative Political Studies

SN - 0010-4140

IS - 9

ER -