Introduction

Balancing Flexibility and Security for Young People During the Crisis

Raul Eamets, Katrin Humal, Miroslav Beblavý, Ilaria Maselli, Kariappa Bheemaiah, Mark Smith, Mairéad Finn, Janine Leschke

    Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskning

    12 Downloads (Pure)

    Resumé

    The balance of flexibility and security for labour market participants is a perennial challenge for policy-makers. In the late 1990s, the term ‘flexicurity’ seemed to offer a solution to this balancing act. Indeed, in the first decade of this century, ‘flexicurity’ became a dominant theme at the European and national level, and although its use has declined in recent years, the flexibility/security balance has remained a central factor in determining labour market outcomes – particularly for young people.
    However, the concept of ‘flexicurity’ received a lot of criticism, often related to a lack of clarity in its definition. On the one hand, this definitional ambiguity helps explain why the concept was picked up so easily at the policy level across a wide variety of stakeholders and national contexts. On the other hand, the ambiguity also explains how policies resulting in an overemphasis on (external) flexibility and employability, with little emphasis on job and income security, were developed. Whatever the term used, the balance of flexibility and security remains a key dimension in understanding the plight of young people entering the labour market, and the economic crisis only served to further expose the uneven security afforded to different labour market groups.
    Young people tend to accumulate negative flexibility outcomes in that they have more limited contractual security, and a greater risk of working on non-standard contracts and of losing their jobs more quickly than the comparable adult population. At the same time, young people also have less job and income security because of their lower seniority and more limited employment histories. Furthermore, in most European countries, workers on non-standard contracts have more limited access to unemployment benefits than workers on standard employment contracts. These are all factors that can exacerbate the position of vulnerable labour market groups, which are often disproportionally engaged on such contracts – young people, women and people with lower education levels. The crisis exacerbated the risks of these negative outcomes.
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    TitelYouth Employment : STYLE Handbook
    RedaktørerJacqueline O’Reilly, Clémentine Moyart, Tiziana Nazio, Mark Smith
    Antal sider4
    Udgivelses stedBrighton
    ForlagSTYLE. University of Brighton
    Publikationsdato2017
    ISBN (Trykt)9781910172179
    ISBN (Elektronisk)9781910172186
    StatusUdgivet - 2017

    Emneord

    • Flexibility
    • Flexicurity
    • Security
    • Youth

    Citer dette

    Eamets, R., Humal, K., Beblavý, M., Maselli, I., Bheemaiah, K., Smith, M., ... Leschke, J. (2017). Introduction: Balancing Flexibility and Security for Young People During the Crisis. I J. O’Reilly, C. Moyart, T. Nazio, & M. Smith (red.), Youth Employment: STYLE Handbook Brighton: STYLE. University of Brighton.
    Eamets, Raul ; Humal, Katrin ; Beblavý, Miroslav ; Maselli, Ilaria ; Bheemaiah, Kariappa ; Smith, Mark ; Finn, Mairéad ; Leschke, Janine. / Introduction : Balancing Flexibility and Security for Young People During the Crisis. Youth Employment: STYLE Handbook. red. / Jacqueline O’Reilly ; Clémentine Moyart ; Tiziana Nazio ; Mark Smith. Brighton : STYLE. University of Brighton, 2017.
    @inbook{1728cbde8d914e48a76025bea60cfe67,
    title = "Introduction: Balancing Flexibility and Security for Young People During the Crisis",
    abstract = "The balance of flexibility and security for labour market participants is a perennial challenge for policy-makers. In the late 1990s, the term ‘flexicurity’ seemed to offer a solution to this balancing act. Indeed, in the first decade of this century, ‘flexicurity’ became a dominant theme at the European and national level, and although its use has declined in recent years, the flexibility/security balance has remained a central factor in determining labour market outcomes – particularly for young people.However, the concept of ‘flexicurity’ received a lot of criticism, often related to a lack of clarity in its definition. On the one hand, this definitional ambiguity helps explain why the concept was picked up so easily at the policy level across a wide variety of stakeholders and national contexts. On the other hand, the ambiguity also explains how policies resulting in an overemphasis on (external) flexibility and employability, with little emphasis on job and income security, were developed. Whatever the term used, the balance of flexibility and security remains a key dimension in understanding the plight of young people entering the labour market, and the economic crisis only served to further expose the uneven security afforded to different labour market groups.Young people tend to accumulate negative flexibility outcomes in that they have more limited contractual security, and a greater risk of working on non-standard contracts and of losing their jobs more quickly than the comparable adult population. At the same time, young people also have less job and income security because of their lower seniority and more limited employment histories. Furthermore, in most European countries, workers on non-standard contracts have more limited access to unemployment benefits than workers on standard employment contracts. These are all factors that can exacerbate the position of vulnerable labour market groups, which are often disproportionally engaged on such contracts – young people, women and people with lower education levels. The crisis exacerbated the risks of these negative outcomes.",
    keywords = "Flexibility, Flexicurity, Security, Youth, Flexibility, Flexicurity, Security, Youth",
    author = "Raul Eamets and Katrin Humal and Miroslav Beblav{\'y} and Ilaria Maselli and Kariappa Bheemaiah and Mark Smith and Mair{\'e}ad Finn and Janine Leschke",
    year = "2017",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "9781910172179",
    editor = "Jacqueline O’Reilly and Cl{\'e}mentine Moyart and Tiziana Nazio and Mark Smith",
    booktitle = "Youth Employment",
    publisher = "STYLE. University of Brighton",
    address = "United Kingdom",

    }

    Eamets, R, Humal, K, Beblavý, M, Maselli, I, Bheemaiah, K, Smith, M, Finn, M & Leschke, J 2017, Introduction: Balancing Flexibility and Security for Young People During the Crisis. i J O’Reilly, C Moyart, T Nazio & M Smith (red), Youth Employment: STYLE Handbook. STYLE. University of Brighton, Brighton.

    Introduction : Balancing Flexibility and Security for Young People During the Crisis. / Eamets, Raul; Humal, Katrin; Beblavý, Miroslav; Maselli, Ilaria; Bheemaiah, Kariappa; Smith, Mark; Finn, Mairéad; Leschke, Janine.

    Youth Employment: STYLE Handbook. red. / Jacqueline O’Reilly; Clémentine Moyart; Tiziana Nazio; Mark Smith. Brighton : STYLE. University of Brighton, 2017.

    Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskning

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Introduction

    T2 - Balancing Flexibility and Security for Young People During the Crisis

    AU - Eamets, Raul

    AU - Humal, Katrin

    AU - Beblavý, Miroslav

    AU - Maselli, Ilaria

    AU - Bheemaiah, Kariappa

    AU - Smith, Mark

    AU - Finn, Mairéad

    AU - Leschke, Janine

    PY - 2017

    Y1 - 2017

    N2 - The balance of flexibility and security for labour market participants is a perennial challenge for policy-makers. In the late 1990s, the term ‘flexicurity’ seemed to offer a solution to this balancing act. Indeed, in the first decade of this century, ‘flexicurity’ became a dominant theme at the European and national level, and although its use has declined in recent years, the flexibility/security balance has remained a central factor in determining labour market outcomes – particularly for young people.However, the concept of ‘flexicurity’ received a lot of criticism, often related to a lack of clarity in its definition. On the one hand, this definitional ambiguity helps explain why the concept was picked up so easily at the policy level across a wide variety of stakeholders and national contexts. On the other hand, the ambiguity also explains how policies resulting in an overemphasis on (external) flexibility and employability, with little emphasis on job and income security, were developed. Whatever the term used, the balance of flexibility and security remains a key dimension in understanding the plight of young people entering the labour market, and the economic crisis only served to further expose the uneven security afforded to different labour market groups.Young people tend to accumulate negative flexibility outcomes in that they have more limited contractual security, and a greater risk of working on non-standard contracts and of losing their jobs more quickly than the comparable adult population. At the same time, young people also have less job and income security because of their lower seniority and more limited employment histories. Furthermore, in most European countries, workers on non-standard contracts have more limited access to unemployment benefits than workers on standard employment contracts. These are all factors that can exacerbate the position of vulnerable labour market groups, which are often disproportionally engaged on such contracts – young people, women and people with lower education levels. The crisis exacerbated the risks of these negative outcomes.

    AB - The balance of flexibility and security for labour market participants is a perennial challenge for policy-makers. In the late 1990s, the term ‘flexicurity’ seemed to offer a solution to this balancing act. Indeed, in the first decade of this century, ‘flexicurity’ became a dominant theme at the European and national level, and although its use has declined in recent years, the flexibility/security balance has remained a central factor in determining labour market outcomes – particularly for young people.However, the concept of ‘flexicurity’ received a lot of criticism, often related to a lack of clarity in its definition. On the one hand, this definitional ambiguity helps explain why the concept was picked up so easily at the policy level across a wide variety of stakeholders and national contexts. On the other hand, the ambiguity also explains how policies resulting in an overemphasis on (external) flexibility and employability, with little emphasis on job and income security, were developed. Whatever the term used, the balance of flexibility and security remains a key dimension in understanding the plight of young people entering the labour market, and the economic crisis only served to further expose the uneven security afforded to different labour market groups.Young people tend to accumulate negative flexibility outcomes in that they have more limited contractual security, and a greater risk of working on non-standard contracts and of losing their jobs more quickly than the comparable adult population. At the same time, young people also have less job and income security because of their lower seniority and more limited employment histories. Furthermore, in most European countries, workers on non-standard contracts have more limited access to unemployment benefits than workers on standard employment contracts. These are all factors that can exacerbate the position of vulnerable labour market groups, which are often disproportionally engaged on such contracts – young people, women and people with lower education levels. The crisis exacerbated the risks of these negative outcomes.

    KW - Flexibility

    KW - Flexicurity

    KW - Security

    KW - Youth

    KW - Flexibility

    KW - Flexicurity

    KW - Security

    KW - Youth

    M3 - Book chapter

    SN - 9781910172179

    BT - Youth Employment

    A2 - O’Reilly, Jacqueline

    A2 - Moyart, Clémentine

    A2 - Nazio, Tiziana

    A2 - Smith, Mark

    PB - STYLE. University of Brighton

    CY - Brighton

    ER -

    Eamets R, Humal K, Beblavý M, Maselli I, Bheemaiah K, Smith M et al. Introduction: Balancing Flexibility and Security for Young People During the Crisis. I O’Reilly J, Moyart C, Nazio T, Smith M, red., Youth Employment: STYLE Handbook. Brighton: STYLE. University of Brighton. 2017