Institutional Competitiveness in the Global Economy: Denmark and the United States

John L. Campbell, Ove K. Pedersen

    Publikation: Working paperForskning

    Resumé

    Despite high taxes, a large state budget and welfare state, much economic regulation, and a very open economy, Denmark continues to compete successfully against the other advanced capitalist economies. Hence, Denmark presents a paradox for neoliberalism, which predicts that these policies will hurt national competitiveness under conditions of economic globalization. Following the varieties of capitalism literature, this paper argues that Denmark's success has been based in large part on its institutional competitiveness-its capacity to achieve socioeconomic success as a result of the competitive advantages that firms derive from operating within a particular set of political and economic institutions. The institutional basis for successfully coordinating labor markets, vocational training and skill formation programs, and industrial policy are examined for Denmark and the United States—two countries that are very different institutionally. The analysis shows that there is no one best way to achieve success in today's global economy, except perhaps for reducing socioeconomic inequality; that the type of capitalism known as coordinated market economies are oversimplified in the literature; and that high taxes, state spending, and economic regulation can actually enhance socioeconomic performance.
    Despite high taxes, a large state budget and welfare state, much economic regulation, and a very open economy, Denmark continues to compete successfully against the other advanced capitalist economies. Hence, Denmark presents a paradox for neoliberalism, which predicts that these policies will hurt national competitiveness under conditions of economic globalization. Following the varieties of capitalism literature, this paper argues that Denmark's success has been based in large part on its institutional competitiveness-its capacity to achieve socioeconomic success as a result of the competitive advantages that firms derive from operating within a particular set of political and economic institutions. The institutional basis for successfully coordinating labor markets, vocational training and skill formation programs, and industrial policy are examined for Denmark and the United States—two countries that are very different institutionally. The analysis shows that there is no one best way to achieve success in today's global economy, except perhaps for reducing socioeconomic inequality; that the type of capitalism known as coordinated market economies are oversimplified in the literature; and that high taxes, state spending, and economic regulation can actually enhance socioeconomic performance.
    SprogEngelsk
    Udgivelses stedKøbenhavn
    UdgiverDepartment of Business and Politics. Copenhagen Business School
    Antal sider33
    ISBN (Trykt)8791690234
    StatusUdgivet - 2005

    Emneord

    • International konkurrenceevne
    • Økonomisk sociologi

    Citer dette

    Campbell, J. L., & Pedersen, O. K. (2005). Institutional Competitiveness in the Global Economy: Denmark and the United States. København: Department of Business and Politics. Copenhagen Business School.
    Campbell, John L. ; Pedersen, Ove K./ Institutional Competitiveness in the Global Economy : Denmark and the United States. København : Department of Business and Politics. Copenhagen Business School, 2005.
    @techreport{72b560e0dd3b11db84f6000ea68e967b,
    title = "Institutional Competitiveness in the Global Economy: Denmark and the United States",
    abstract = "Despite high taxes, a large state budget and welfare state, much economic regulation, and a very open economy, Denmark continues to compete successfully against the other advanced capitalist economies. Hence, Denmark presents a paradox for neoliberalism, which predicts that these policies will hurt national competitiveness under conditions of economic globalization. Following the varieties of capitalism literature, this paper argues that Denmark's success has been based in large part on its institutional competitiveness-its capacity to achieve socioeconomic success as a result of the competitive advantages that firms derive from operating within a particular set of political and economic institutions. The institutional basis for successfully coordinating labor markets, vocational training and skill formation programs, and industrial policy are examined for Denmark and the United States—two countries that are very different institutionally. The analysis shows that there is no one best way to achieve success in today's global economy, except perhaps for reducing socioeconomic inequality; that the type of capitalism known as coordinated market economies are oversimplified in the literature; and that high taxes, state spending, and economic regulation can actually enhance socioeconomic performance.",
    keywords = "International konkurrenceevne, {\O}konomisk sociologi",
    author = "Campbell, {John L.} and Pedersen, {Ove K.}",
    year = "2005",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "8791690234",
    publisher = "Department of Business and Politics. Copenhagen Business School",
    type = "WorkingPaper",
    institution = "Department of Business and Politics. Copenhagen Business School",

    }

    Campbell, JL & Pedersen, OK 2005 'Institutional Competitiveness in the Global Economy: Denmark and the United States' Department of Business and Politics. Copenhagen Business School, København.

    Institutional Competitiveness in the Global Economy : Denmark and the United States. / Campbell, John L.; Pedersen, Ove K.

    København : Department of Business and Politics. Copenhagen Business School, 2005.

    Publikation: Working paperForskning

    TY - UNPB

    T1 - Institutional Competitiveness in the Global Economy

    T2 - Denmark and the United States

    AU - Campbell,John L.

    AU - Pedersen,Ove K.

    PY - 2005

    Y1 - 2005

    N2 - Despite high taxes, a large state budget and welfare state, much economic regulation, and a very open economy, Denmark continues to compete successfully against the other advanced capitalist economies. Hence, Denmark presents a paradox for neoliberalism, which predicts that these policies will hurt national competitiveness under conditions of economic globalization. Following the varieties of capitalism literature, this paper argues that Denmark's success has been based in large part on its institutional competitiveness-its capacity to achieve socioeconomic success as a result of the competitive advantages that firms derive from operating within a particular set of political and economic institutions. The institutional basis for successfully coordinating labor markets, vocational training and skill formation programs, and industrial policy are examined for Denmark and the United States—two countries that are very different institutionally. The analysis shows that there is no one best way to achieve success in today's global economy, except perhaps for reducing socioeconomic inequality; that the type of capitalism known as coordinated market economies are oversimplified in the literature; and that high taxes, state spending, and economic regulation can actually enhance socioeconomic performance.

    AB - Despite high taxes, a large state budget and welfare state, much economic regulation, and a very open economy, Denmark continues to compete successfully against the other advanced capitalist economies. Hence, Denmark presents a paradox for neoliberalism, which predicts that these policies will hurt national competitiveness under conditions of economic globalization. Following the varieties of capitalism literature, this paper argues that Denmark's success has been based in large part on its institutional competitiveness-its capacity to achieve socioeconomic success as a result of the competitive advantages that firms derive from operating within a particular set of political and economic institutions. The institutional basis for successfully coordinating labor markets, vocational training and skill formation programs, and industrial policy are examined for Denmark and the United States—two countries that are very different institutionally. The analysis shows that there is no one best way to achieve success in today's global economy, except perhaps for reducing socioeconomic inequality; that the type of capitalism known as coordinated market economies are oversimplified in the literature; and that high taxes, state spending, and economic regulation can actually enhance socioeconomic performance.

    KW - International konkurrenceevne

    KW - Økonomisk sociologi

    M3 - Working paper

    SN - 8791690234

    BT - Institutional Competitiveness in the Global Economy

    PB - Department of Business and Politics. Copenhagen Business School

    CY - København

    ER -

    Campbell JL, Pedersen OK. Institutional Competitiveness in the Global Economy: Denmark and the United States. København: Department of Business and Politics. Copenhagen Business School. 2005.