If the Indicator Game is the Answer, Then What is the Question?

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

This contribution begins by arguing that indicators in themselves do not have effects, but that it is crucial to understand which questions in the wider culture and governance of academia their use speaks to. Drawing partly on the author’s own experience in university management but also as an STS scholar, five important questions are presented to which indicators provide a kind of answer: ranging from public accountability over public research investment to intellectual and existential uncertainty. It is argued that understanding the wider institutional and professional logics is crucial if “better tunes” are to be developed in response to the indicator game: both to strengthen the standing and identity of the field and to support emerging scholars in this challenging context. The paper closes by inviting STSers - and particularly our professional institutions - to celebrate and, at the same time, take a stand for our diverse values, academic practices and notions of quality.
This contribution begins by arguing that indicators in themselves do not have effects, but that it is crucial to understand which questions in the wider culture and governance of academia their use speaks to. Drawing partly on the author’s own experience in university management but also as an STS scholar, five important questions are presented to which indicators provide a kind of answer: ranging from public accountability over public research investment to intellectual and existential uncertainty. It is argued that understanding the wider institutional and professional logics is crucial if “better tunes” are to be developed in response to the indicator game: both to strengthen the standing and identity of the field and to support emerging scholars in this challenging context. The paper closes by inviting STSers - and particularly our professional institutions - to celebrate and, at the same time, take a stand for our diverse values, academic practices and notions of quality.
SprogEngelsk
TidsskriftEngaging Science, Technology, and Society
Vol/bind3
Sider64-72
ISSN2413-8053
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2017

Emneord

  • Indicators
  • Metrics
  • Academic careers

Citer dette

@article{caeab2384ab6431bba81583077d1ef34,
title = "If the Indicator Game is the Answer, Then What is the Question?",
abstract = "This contribution begins by arguing that indicators in themselves do not have effects, but that it is crucial to understand which questions in the wider culture and governance of academia their use speaks to. Drawing partly on the author’s own experience in university management but also as an STS scholar, five important questions are presented to which indicators provide a kind of answer: ranging from public accountability over public research investment to intellectual and existential uncertainty. It is argued that understanding the wider institutional and professional logics is crucial if “better tunes” are to be developed in response to the indicator game: both to strengthen the standing and identity of the field and to support emerging scholars in this challenging context. The paper closes by inviting STSers - and particularly our professional institutions - to celebrate and, at the same time, take a stand for our diverse values, academic practices and notions of quality.",
keywords = "Indicators, Metrics, Academic careers, Indicators, Metrics, Academic careers",
author = "Alan Irwin",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.17351/ests2017.110",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "64--72",
journal = "Engaging Science, Technology, and Society",
issn = "2413-8053",
publisher = "Society for Social Studies of Science",

}

If the Indicator Game is the Answer, Then What is the Question? / Irwin, Alan.

I: Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, Bind 3, 2017, s. 64-72.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - If the Indicator Game is the Answer, Then What is the Question?

AU - Irwin,Alan

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - This contribution begins by arguing that indicators in themselves do not have effects, but that it is crucial to understand which questions in the wider culture and governance of academia their use speaks to. Drawing partly on the author’s own experience in university management but also as an STS scholar, five important questions are presented to which indicators provide a kind of answer: ranging from public accountability over public research investment to intellectual and existential uncertainty. It is argued that understanding the wider institutional and professional logics is crucial if “better tunes” are to be developed in response to the indicator game: both to strengthen the standing and identity of the field and to support emerging scholars in this challenging context. The paper closes by inviting STSers - and particularly our professional institutions - to celebrate and, at the same time, take a stand for our diverse values, academic practices and notions of quality.

AB - This contribution begins by arguing that indicators in themselves do not have effects, but that it is crucial to understand which questions in the wider culture and governance of academia their use speaks to. Drawing partly on the author’s own experience in university management but also as an STS scholar, five important questions are presented to which indicators provide a kind of answer: ranging from public accountability over public research investment to intellectual and existential uncertainty. It is argued that understanding the wider institutional and professional logics is crucial if “better tunes” are to be developed in response to the indicator game: both to strengthen the standing and identity of the field and to support emerging scholars in this challenging context. The paper closes by inviting STSers - and particularly our professional institutions - to celebrate and, at the same time, take a stand for our diverse values, academic practices and notions of quality.

KW - Indicators

KW - Metrics

KW - Academic careers

KW - Indicators

KW - Metrics

KW - Academic careers

U2 - 10.17351/ests2017.110

DO - 10.17351/ests2017.110

M3 - Journal article

VL - 3

SP - 64

EP - 72

JO - Engaging Science, Technology, and Society

T2 - Engaging Science, Technology, and Society

JF - Engaging Science, Technology, and Society

SN - 2413-8053

ER -