Human Resource Management in Professional Services Firms: Too Good to be True? Transcending Conflicting Institutional Logics

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Why is it that HR specialists appear to have difficulty applying their knowledge, systems and techniques in a systematic way when it comes to professional services firms (PSFs) -- particularly when the drivers for developing powerful HRM practices within such businesses seem more pressing than ever? This paper analyzes the ways HR specialists and PSF managers/partners differ in their understanding of organizations and their management. The analysis supports the argument that, while HR specialists and the discipline of HRM are governed by bureaucratic logic in their approach to management, PSF managers by contrast are driven by professional logic. This creates a number of subtle as well as explicit tensions and disconnects that will have to be tackled if the practices of HRM are to prevail in PSFs. This paper contributes to HRM literature as well as institutional theory, by applying an analysis of institutional logics to HRM practice in PSFs. The paper builds on interviews with five HR managers who have held positions in PSFs, as well as a longitudinal case study of PSF managers in one of the 'Big Four' accounting firms. The paper offers a number of tentative proposals around how HRM and PSFs might transcend the described gulf between the two approaches to management.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftZeitschrift fuer Personalforschung
Vol/bind29
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)102-130
Antal sider29
ISSN0179-6437
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2015

Emneord

  • Bureaucracy
  • HRM
  • Institutional logics
  • Professional service firms

Citer dette

@article{98d1d74468be44049705902a9f82508b,
title = "Human Resource Management in Professional Services Firms: Too Good to be True?: Transcending Conflicting Institutional Logics",
abstract = "Why is it that HR specialists appear to have difficulty applying their knowledge, systems and techniques in a systematic way when it comes to professional services firms (PSFs) -- particularly when the drivers for developing powerful HRM practices within such businesses seem more pressing than ever? This paper analyzes the ways HR specialists and PSF managers/partners differ in their understanding of organizations and their management. The analysis supports the argument that, while HR specialists and the discipline of HRM are governed by bureaucratic logic in their approach to management, PSF managers by contrast are driven by professional logic. This creates a number of subtle as well as explicit tensions and disconnects that will have to be tackled if the practices of HRM are to prevail in PSFs. This paper contributes to HRM literature as well as institutional theory, by applying an analysis of institutional logics to HRM practice in PSFs. The paper builds on interviews with five HR managers who have held positions in PSFs, as well as a longitudinal case study of PSF managers in one of the 'Big Four' accounting firms. The paper offers a number of tentative proposals around how HRM and PSFs might transcend the described gulf between the two approaches to management.",
keywords = "Bureaucracy, HRM, Institutional logics, Professional service firms",
author = "Frans B{\'e}vort and Flemming Poulfelt",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1688/ZfP-2015-02-Bevort",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "102--130",
journal = "German Journal of Human Resource Management / Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Personalforschung",
issn = "0179-6437",
publisher = "Sage Publications Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

Human Resource Management in Professional Services Firms: Too Good to be True? Transcending Conflicting Institutional Logics. / Bévort, Frans; Poulfelt, Flemming.

I: Zeitschrift fuer Personalforschung, Bind 29, Nr. 2, 2015, s. 102-130.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Human Resource Management in Professional Services Firms: Too Good to be True?

T2 - Transcending Conflicting Institutional Logics

AU - Bévort, Frans

AU - Poulfelt, Flemming

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Why is it that HR specialists appear to have difficulty applying their knowledge, systems and techniques in a systematic way when it comes to professional services firms (PSFs) -- particularly when the drivers for developing powerful HRM practices within such businesses seem more pressing than ever? This paper analyzes the ways HR specialists and PSF managers/partners differ in their understanding of organizations and their management. The analysis supports the argument that, while HR specialists and the discipline of HRM are governed by bureaucratic logic in their approach to management, PSF managers by contrast are driven by professional logic. This creates a number of subtle as well as explicit tensions and disconnects that will have to be tackled if the practices of HRM are to prevail in PSFs. This paper contributes to HRM literature as well as institutional theory, by applying an analysis of institutional logics to HRM practice in PSFs. The paper builds on interviews with five HR managers who have held positions in PSFs, as well as a longitudinal case study of PSF managers in one of the 'Big Four' accounting firms. The paper offers a number of tentative proposals around how HRM and PSFs might transcend the described gulf between the two approaches to management.

AB - Why is it that HR specialists appear to have difficulty applying their knowledge, systems and techniques in a systematic way when it comes to professional services firms (PSFs) -- particularly when the drivers for developing powerful HRM practices within such businesses seem more pressing than ever? This paper analyzes the ways HR specialists and PSF managers/partners differ in their understanding of organizations and their management. The analysis supports the argument that, while HR specialists and the discipline of HRM are governed by bureaucratic logic in their approach to management, PSF managers by contrast are driven by professional logic. This creates a number of subtle as well as explicit tensions and disconnects that will have to be tackled if the practices of HRM are to prevail in PSFs. This paper contributes to HRM literature as well as institutional theory, by applying an analysis of institutional logics to HRM practice in PSFs. The paper builds on interviews with five HR managers who have held positions in PSFs, as well as a longitudinal case study of PSF managers in one of the 'Big Four' accounting firms. The paper offers a number of tentative proposals around how HRM and PSFs might transcend the described gulf between the two approaches to management.

KW - Bureaucracy

KW - HRM

KW - Institutional logics

KW - Professional service firms

UR - http://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110978984348147&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1688/ZfP-2015-02-Bevort

DO - 10.1688/ZfP-2015-02-Bevort

M3 - Journal article

VL - 29

SP - 102

EP - 130

JO - German Journal of Human Resource Management / Zeitschrift für Personalforschung

JF - German Journal of Human Resource Management / Zeitschrift für Personalforschung

SN - 0179-6437

IS - 2

ER -