House United, House Divided: Explaining the EU's Unity in the Brexit Negotiations

Mads Dagnis Jensen, Jesper Dahl Kelstrup

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

Resumé

While the UK's EU referendum and the resulting decision to leave the EU have been widely understood to contrast with European values such as cosmopolitanism, tolerance, pragmatism and shared sovereignty (Adler-Nissen et al., 2017), identity formation in response to the Brexit negotiations has several underpinnings. The Brexit negotiations have contributed toward reinforcing a common EU identity based on the idea that the UK has always been an "awkward partner" in the EU, tending to oppose European integration in many areas (George, 1994). The EU's unity in response to the Brexit divorce settlement is not likely to transpose to other third-party negotiations, and it may even be challenged when the future relationship between the EU and the UK is put on the table.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Common Market Studies
Vol/bind57
Udgave nummerS1
Sider (fra-til)28-39
Antal sider12
ISSN0021-9886
DOI
StatusUdgivet - sep. 2019

Bibliografisk note

Published online: 5. August 2019

Citer dette

@article{75087ab7849c4c139263d89df4cf79fd,
title = "House United, House Divided: Explaining the EU's Unity in the Brexit Negotiations",
abstract = "While the UK's EU referendum and the resulting decision to leave the EU have been widely understood to contrast with European values such as cosmopolitanism, tolerance, pragmatism and shared sovereignty (Adler-Nissen et al., 2017), identity formation in response to the Brexit negotiations has several underpinnings. The Brexit negotiations have contributed toward reinforcing a common EU identity based on the idea that the UK has always been an {"}awkward partner{"} in the EU, tending to oppose European integration in many areas (George, 1994). The EU's unity in response to the Brexit divorce settlement is not likely to transpose to other third-party negotiations, and it may even be challenged when the future relationship between the EU and the UK is put on the table.",
author = "Jensen, {Mads Dagnis} and Kelstrup, {Jesper Dahl}",
note = "Published online: 5. August 2019",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1111/jcms.12919",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "28--39",
journal = "Journal of Common Market Studies",
issn = "0021-9886",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing",
number = "S1",

}

House United, House Divided : Explaining the EU's Unity in the Brexit Negotiations. / Jensen, Mads Dagnis; Kelstrup, Jesper Dahl.

I: Journal of Common Market Studies, Bind 57, Nr. S1, 09.2019, s. 28-39.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - House United, House Divided

T2 - Explaining the EU's Unity in the Brexit Negotiations

AU - Jensen, Mads Dagnis

AU - Kelstrup, Jesper Dahl

N1 - Published online: 5. August 2019

PY - 2019/9

Y1 - 2019/9

N2 - While the UK's EU referendum and the resulting decision to leave the EU have been widely understood to contrast with European values such as cosmopolitanism, tolerance, pragmatism and shared sovereignty (Adler-Nissen et al., 2017), identity formation in response to the Brexit negotiations has several underpinnings. The Brexit negotiations have contributed toward reinforcing a common EU identity based on the idea that the UK has always been an "awkward partner" in the EU, tending to oppose European integration in many areas (George, 1994). The EU's unity in response to the Brexit divorce settlement is not likely to transpose to other third-party negotiations, and it may even be challenged when the future relationship between the EU and the UK is put on the table.

AB - While the UK's EU referendum and the resulting decision to leave the EU have been widely understood to contrast with European values such as cosmopolitanism, tolerance, pragmatism and shared sovereignty (Adler-Nissen et al., 2017), identity formation in response to the Brexit negotiations has several underpinnings. The Brexit negotiations have contributed toward reinforcing a common EU identity based on the idea that the UK has always been an "awkward partner" in the EU, tending to oppose European integration in many areas (George, 1994). The EU's unity in response to the Brexit divorce settlement is not likely to transpose to other third-party negotiations, and it may even be challenged when the future relationship between the EU and the UK is put on the table.

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921348259&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1111/jcms.12919

DO - 10.1111/jcms.12919

M3 - Review

VL - 57

SP - 28

EP - 39

JO - Journal of Common Market Studies

JF - Journal of Common Market Studies

SN - 0021-9886

IS - S1

ER -