Health Care Need

Three Interpretations

Andreas Hasman, Tony Hope, Lars Peter Østerdal

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

The argument that scarce health care resources should be distributed so that patients in ‘need’ are given priority for treatment is rarely contested. In this paper, we argue that if need is to play a significant role in distributive decisions it is crucial that what is meant by need can be precisely articulated. Following a discussion of the general features of health care need, we propose three principal interpretations of need, each of which focuses on separate intuitions. Although this account may not be a completely exhaustive reflection of what people mean when they refer to need, the three interpretations provide a starting-point for further debate of what the concept means in its specific application. We discuss combined interpretations, the meaning of grading needs, and compare needs-based priority setting to social welfare maximisation.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Applied Philosophy
Vol/bind23
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)145–156
ISSN0264-3758
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2006
Udgivet eksterntJa

Citer dette

Hasman, Andreas ; Hope, Tony ; Østerdal, Lars Peter. / Health Care Need : Three Interpretations. I: Journal of Applied Philosophy. 2006 ; Bind 23, Nr. 2. s. 145–156.
@article{f207b72ea2ce447593d477492b37690e,
title = "Health Care Need: Three Interpretations",
abstract = "The argument that scarce health care resources should be distributed so that patients in ‘need’ are given priority for treatment is rarely contested. In this paper, we argue that if need is to play a significant role in distributive decisions it is crucial that what is meant by need can be precisely articulated. Following a discussion of the general features of health care need, we propose three principal interpretations of need, each of which focuses on separate intuitions. Although this account may not be a completely exhaustive reflection of what people mean when they refer to need, the three interpretations provide a starting-point for further debate of what the concept means in its specific application. We discuss combined interpretations, the meaning of grading needs, and compare needs-based priority setting to social welfare maximisation.",
author = "Andreas Hasman and Tony Hope and {\O}sterdal, {Lars Peter}",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-5930.2006.00325.x",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "145–156",
journal = "Journal of Applied Philosophy",
issn = "0264-3758",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing",
number = "2",

}

Health Care Need : Three Interpretations. / Hasman, Andreas; Hope, Tony; Østerdal, Lars Peter.

I: Journal of Applied Philosophy, Bind 23, Nr. 2, 2006, s. 145–156.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Health Care Need

T2 - Three Interpretations

AU - Hasman, Andreas

AU - Hope, Tony

AU - Østerdal, Lars Peter

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - The argument that scarce health care resources should be distributed so that patients in ‘need’ are given priority for treatment is rarely contested. In this paper, we argue that if need is to play a significant role in distributive decisions it is crucial that what is meant by need can be precisely articulated. Following a discussion of the general features of health care need, we propose three principal interpretations of need, each of which focuses on separate intuitions. Although this account may not be a completely exhaustive reflection of what people mean when they refer to need, the three interpretations provide a starting-point for further debate of what the concept means in its specific application. We discuss combined interpretations, the meaning of grading needs, and compare needs-based priority setting to social welfare maximisation.

AB - The argument that scarce health care resources should be distributed so that patients in ‘need’ are given priority for treatment is rarely contested. In this paper, we argue that if need is to play a significant role in distributive decisions it is crucial that what is meant by need can be precisely articulated. Following a discussion of the general features of health care need, we propose three principal interpretations of need, each of which focuses on separate intuitions. Although this account may not be a completely exhaustive reflection of what people mean when they refer to need, the three interpretations provide a starting-point for further debate of what the concept means in its specific application. We discuss combined interpretations, the meaning of grading needs, and compare needs-based priority setting to social welfare maximisation.

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=963017453041&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2006.00325.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2006.00325.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 23

SP - 145

EP - 156

JO - Journal of Applied Philosophy

JF - Journal of Applied Philosophy

SN - 0264-3758

IS - 2

ER -