TY - JOUR
T1 - Globally Networked
T2 - Intraorganizational Boundary Spanning in the Global Organization
AU - Pedersen, Torben
AU - Soda, Giuseppe
AU - Stea, Diego
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Multinational corporations (MNCs) need to sense, source, and mobilize knowledge when and where it arises, whether at home, or elsewhere in the world. For this reason, MNCs benefit from employee networks of relationships that span across intraorganizational barriers, allowing for the efficient mobilization of knowledge across boundaries. Yet, which organizational members are more likely to be able to develop these boundary spanning networks? We leverage a unique data set from a large multinational corporation to empirically test a comprehensive model that captures the effect of an employee’s mandate, expertise, and behavioral orientations on her likelihood to span intraorganizational boundaries that manifest themselves in the form of hierarchies, intra-functional domains, and geographic territories. We find that the employees that are more likely to be boundary spanners are those having mandates with a global impact, high levels of expertise, and a collaborative orientation in their networking behaviors. In addition, we find that these effects are stronger for those employees that have large formal workflow networks.
AB - Multinational corporations (MNCs) need to sense, source, and mobilize knowledge when and where it arises, whether at home, or elsewhere in the world. For this reason, MNCs benefit from employee networks of relationships that span across intraorganizational barriers, allowing for the efficient mobilization of knowledge across boundaries. Yet, which organizational members are more likely to be able to develop these boundary spanning networks? We leverage a unique data set from a large multinational corporation to empirically test a comprehensive model that captures the effect of an employee’s mandate, expertise, and behavioral orientations on her likelihood to span intraorganizational boundaries that manifest themselves in the form of hierarchies, intra-functional domains, and geographic territories. We find that the employees that are more likely to be boundary spanners are those having mandates with a global impact, high levels of expertise, and a collaborative orientation in their networking behaviors. In addition, we find that these effects are stronger for those employees that have large formal workflow networks.
KW - Boundary spanning
KW - Multinational corporations
KW - Social networks
KW - Knowledge mobilization
KW - Boundary spanning
KW - Multinational corporations
KW - Social networks
KW - Knowledge mobilization
U2 - 10.1016/j.jwb.2019.03.001
DO - 10.1016/j.jwb.2019.03.001
M3 - Journal article
SN - 1090-9516
VL - 54
SP - 169
EP - 180
JO - Journal of World Business
JF - Journal of World Business
IS - 3
ER -