Gantt Charts Revisited: A Critical Analysis of its Roots and Implications to the Management of Projects Today

Joana Geraldi, Thomas Lechter

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Purpose:
The purpose of this paper is to explore a classic tool in project management, which for some has become almost synonymous with project management: the Gantt chart. The Gantt chart was developed in the early twentieth century, at the heart of Scientific Management; yet, the chart is used with very little adaptation across a wide range of types of projects. In this conceptual paper, the authors question its universal and unreflective use.
Design/methodology/approach:
The authors analyse the conceptual roots of the Gantt chart, its historical development and use, derive its engrained principles, and analyse its implications to the management of projects.
Findings:
While a Gantt chart can be useful to cope with some of the “complicatedness” of projects, and embraces the importance of time and timing, it is based on principles that are not valid to all projects. The consequence is a propagation of a management approach that does not explicitly cope with complexity, ambiguity, uncertainty and change. In that respect, the Gantt chart fails to acknowledge insights from years of organization theory research and project management research with a firm grounding in contingency theory.
Originality/value:
While the majority of contemporary project management thinking already accepted that a normative use can be inappropriate, the practice is still pretty much embracing this approach. By showing the conceptual roots of the Gantt chart, the authors hope to make some of its limitations more evident to practitioners and academics, and encourage its use to be more reflective and contextualised.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftInternational Journal of Managing Projects in Business
Vol/bind5
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)578-594
Antal sider17
ISSN1753-8378
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2012
Udgivet eksterntJa

Emneord

  • Project management
  • Performance criteria
  • Uncertainty management
  • Visualisation
  • Scientific management
  • Gantt chart
  • Project success
  • Rethinking project management

Citer dette

@article{6524e51d933e4dddaca88087c3aee312,
title = "Gantt Charts Revisited: A Critical Analysis of its Roots and Implications to the Management of Projects Today",
abstract = "Purpose:The purpose of this paper is to explore a classic tool in project management, which for some has become almost synonymous with project management: the Gantt chart. The Gantt chart was developed in the early twentieth century, at the heart of Scientific Management; yet, the chart is used with very little adaptation across a wide range of types of projects. In this conceptual paper, the authors question its universal and unreflective use.Design/methodology/approach:The authors analyse the conceptual roots of the Gantt chart, its historical development and use, derive its engrained principles, and analyse its implications to the management of projects.Findings:While a Gantt chart can be useful to cope with some of the “complicatedness” of projects, and embraces the importance of time and timing, it is based on principles that are not valid to all projects. The consequence is a propagation of a management approach that does not explicitly cope with complexity, ambiguity, uncertainty and change. In that respect, the Gantt chart fails to acknowledge insights from years of organization theory research and project management research with a firm grounding in contingency theory.Originality/value:While the majority of contemporary project management thinking already accepted that a normative use can be inappropriate, the practice is still pretty much embracing this approach. By showing the conceptual roots of the Gantt chart, the authors hope to make some of its limitations more evident to practitioners and academics, and encourage its use to be more reflective and contextualised.",
keywords = "Project management, Performance criteria, Uncertainty management, Visualisation, Scientific management, Gantt chart, Project success, Rethinking project management, Project management, Performance criteria, Uncertainty management, Visualisation, Scientific management, Gantt chart, Project success, Rethinking project management",
author = "Joana Geraldi and Thomas Lechter",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1108/17538371211268889",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "578--594",
journal = "International Journal of Managing Projects in Business",
issn = "1753-8378",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing",
number = "4",

}

Gantt Charts Revisited : A Critical Analysis of its Roots and Implications to the Management of Projects Today. / Geraldi, Joana ; Lechter, Thomas.

I: International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, Bind 5, Nr. 4, 2012, s. 578-594.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gantt Charts Revisited

T2 - A Critical Analysis of its Roots and Implications to the Management of Projects Today

AU - Geraldi, Joana

AU - Lechter, Thomas

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Purpose:The purpose of this paper is to explore a classic tool in project management, which for some has become almost synonymous with project management: the Gantt chart. The Gantt chart was developed in the early twentieth century, at the heart of Scientific Management; yet, the chart is used with very little adaptation across a wide range of types of projects. In this conceptual paper, the authors question its universal and unreflective use.Design/methodology/approach:The authors analyse the conceptual roots of the Gantt chart, its historical development and use, derive its engrained principles, and analyse its implications to the management of projects.Findings:While a Gantt chart can be useful to cope with some of the “complicatedness” of projects, and embraces the importance of time and timing, it is based on principles that are not valid to all projects. The consequence is a propagation of a management approach that does not explicitly cope with complexity, ambiguity, uncertainty and change. In that respect, the Gantt chart fails to acknowledge insights from years of organization theory research and project management research with a firm grounding in contingency theory.Originality/value:While the majority of contemporary project management thinking already accepted that a normative use can be inappropriate, the practice is still pretty much embracing this approach. By showing the conceptual roots of the Gantt chart, the authors hope to make some of its limitations more evident to practitioners and academics, and encourage its use to be more reflective and contextualised.

AB - Purpose:The purpose of this paper is to explore a classic tool in project management, which for some has become almost synonymous with project management: the Gantt chart. The Gantt chart was developed in the early twentieth century, at the heart of Scientific Management; yet, the chart is used with very little adaptation across a wide range of types of projects. In this conceptual paper, the authors question its universal and unreflective use.Design/methodology/approach:The authors analyse the conceptual roots of the Gantt chart, its historical development and use, derive its engrained principles, and analyse its implications to the management of projects.Findings:While a Gantt chart can be useful to cope with some of the “complicatedness” of projects, and embraces the importance of time and timing, it is based on principles that are not valid to all projects. The consequence is a propagation of a management approach that does not explicitly cope with complexity, ambiguity, uncertainty and change. In that respect, the Gantt chart fails to acknowledge insights from years of organization theory research and project management research with a firm grounding in contingency theory.Originality/value:While the majority of contemporary project management thinking already accepted that a normative use can be inappropriate, the practice is still pretty much embracing this approach. By showing the conceptual roots of the Gantt chart, the authors hope to make some of its limitations more evident to practitioners and academics, and encourage its use to be more reflective and contextualised.

KW - Project management

KW - Performance criteria

KW - Uncertainty management

KW - Visualisation

KW - Scientific management

KW - Gantt chart

KW - Project success

KW - Rethinking project management

KW - Project management

KW - Performance criteria

KW - Uncertainty management

KW - Visualisation

KW - Scientific management

KW - Gantt chart

KW - Project success

KW - Rethinking project management

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=1000000000366359

U2 - 10.1108/17538371211268889

DO - 10.1108/17538371211268889

M3 - Journal article

VL - 5

SP - 578

EP - 594

JO - International Journal of Managing Projects in Business

JF - International Journal of Managing Projects in Business

SN - 1753-8378

IS - 4

ER -