Gambling Problems in the General Danish Population: Survey Evidence

Glenn W. Harrison, Lasse J. Jessen, Morten Lau, Don Ross

Publikation: Working paperForskning

Resumé

We compare several popular survey instruments for measuring gambling behavior and gambling propensity to assess if they differ in their classification of individuals in the general adult Danish population. We also examine correlations with standard survey instruments for alcohol use, anxiety, depression and impulsivity. A feature of our design is that nobody was excluded on the basis of their response to a “trigger,” “gateway” or “diagnostic item” question about previous gambling history. Our sample consists of 8,405 adult Danes. We administered the Focal Adult Gambling Screen to all subjects and estimate prevalence of gambling problems using sample weights and controlling for sample selection.
We find that 95.4% of the population has no detectable risk, 2.9% has an early risk, 0.8% has an intermediate risk, 0.7% has an advanced risk, and 0.2% can be classified as problem gamblers. There is a significant correlation with the scores of other gambling risk instruments and the instruments measuring alcohol use, anxiety, depression and impulsivity. Using sample weights and controlling for sample selection has a significant effect on prevalence rates: we observe a significant decrease in prevalence ratesof detectable gambling risk groups, since gambling behavior is positively correlated with the decision to participate in gambling surveys. We also find that imposing a threshold gambling history leads to underestimation of the prevalence of gambling problems.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Udgivelses stedAtlanta, GA
UdgiverCEAR, Georgia State University
Antal sider83
StatusUdgivet - 2016
NavnWorking paper / Center for Economic Analysis of Risk (CEAR)
NummerWP2016-02

Citer dette

Harrison, G. W., Jessen, L. J., Lau, M., & Ross, D. (2016). Gambling Problems in the General Danish Population: Survey Evidence. Atlanta, GA: CEAR, Georgia State University. Working paper / Center for Economic Analysis of Risk (CEAR), Nr. WP2016-02
Harrison, Glenn W. ; Jessen, Lasse J. ; Lau, Morten ; Ross, Don. / Gambling Problems in the General Danish Population : Survey Evidence. Atlanta, GA : CEAR, Georgia State University, 2016. (Working paper / Center for Economic Analysis of Risk (CEAR); Nr. WP2016-02).
@techreport{e86fb8a17f874f758699d66d7812508d,
title = "Gambling Problems in the General Danish Population: Survey Evidence",
abstract = "We compare several popular survey instruments for measuring gambling behavior and gambling propensity to assess if they differ in their classification of individuals in the general adult Danish population. We also examine correlations with standard survey instruments for alcohol use, anxiety, depression and impulsivity. A feature of our design is that nobody was excluded on the basis of their response to a “trigger,” “gateway” or “diagnostic item” question about previous gambling history. Our sample consists of 8,405 adult Danes. We administered the Focal Adult Gambling Screen to all subjects and estimate prevalence of gambling problems using sample weights and controlling for sample selection. We find that 95.4{\%} of the population has no detectable risk, 2.9{\%} has an early risk, 0.8{\%} has an intermediate risk, 0.7{\%} has an advanced risk, and 0.2{\%} can be classified as problem gamblers. There is a significant correlation with the scores of other gambling risk instruments and the instruments measuring alcohol use, anxiety, depression and impulsivity. Using sample weights and controlling for sample selection has a significant effect on prevalence rates: we observe a significant decrease in prevalence ratesof detectable gambling risk groups, since gambling behavior is positively correlated with the decision to participate in gambling surveys. We also find that imposing a threshold gambling history leads to underestimation of the prevalence of gambling problems.",
author = "Harrison, {Glenn W.} and Jessen, {Lasse J.} and Morten Lau and Don Ross",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
series = "Working paper / Center for Economic Analysis of Risk (CEAR)",
publisher = "CEAR, Georgia State University",
number = "WP2016-02",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "CEAR, Georgia State University",

}

Harrison, GW, Jessen, LJ, Lau, M & Ross, D 2016 'Gambling Problems in the General Danish Population: Survey Evidence' CEAR, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.

Gambling Problems in the General Danish Population : Survey Evidence. / Harrison, Glenn W.; Jessen, Lasse J.; Lau, Morten; Ross, Don.

Atlanta, GA : CEAR, Georgia State University, 2016.

Publikation: Working paperForskning

TY - UNPB

T1 - Gambling Problems in the General Danish Population

T2 - Survey Evidence

AU - Harrison, Glenn W.

AU - Jessen, Lasse J.

AU - Lau, Morten

AU - Ross, Don

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - We compare several popular survey instruments for measuring gambling behavior and gambling propensity to assess if they differ in their classification of individuals in the general adult Danish population. We also examine correlations with standard survey instruments for alcohol use, anxiety, depression and impulsivity. A feature of our design is that nobody was excluded on the basis of their response to a “trigger,” “gateway” or “diagnostic item” question about previous gambling history. Our sample consists of 8,405 adult Danes. We administered the Focal Adult Gambling Screen to all subjects and estimate prevalence of gambling problems using sample weights and controlling for sample selection. We find that 95.4% of the population has no detectable risk, 2.9% has an early risk, 0.8% has an intermediate risk, 0.7% has an advanced risk, and 0.2% can be classified as problem gamblers. There is a significant correlation with the scores of other gambling risk instruments and the instruments measuring alcohol use, anxiety, depression and impulsivity. Using sample weights and controlling for sample selection has a significant effect on prevalence rates: we observe a significant decrease in prevalence ratesof detectable gambling risk groups, since gambling behavior is positively correlated with the decision to participate in gambling surveys. We also find that imposing a threshold gambling history leads to underestimation of the prevalence of gambling problems.

AB - We compare several popular survey instruments for measuring gambling behavior and gambling propensity to assess if they differ in their classification of individuals in the general adult Danish population. We also examine correlations with standard survey instruments for alcohol use, anxiety, depression and impulsivity. A feature of our design is that nobody was excluded on the basis of their response to a “trigger,” “gateway” or “diagnostic item” question about previous gambling history. Our sample consists of 8,405 adult Danes. We administered the Focal Adult Gambling Screen to all subjects and estimate prevalence of gambling problems using sample weights and controlling for sample selection. We find that 95.4% of the population has no detectable risk, 2.9% has an early risk, 0.8% has an intermediate risk, 0.7% has an advanced risk, and 0.2% can be classified as problem gamblers. There is a significant correlation with the scores of other gambling risk instruments and the instruments measuring alcohol use, anxiety, depression and impulsivity. Using sample weights and controlling for sample selection has a significant effect on prevalence rates: we observe a significant decrease in prevalence ratesof detectable gambling risk groups, since gambling behavior is positively correlated with the decision to participate in gambling surveys. We also find that imposing a threshold gambling history leads to underestimation of the prevalence of gambling problems.

M3 - Working paper

T3 - Working paper / Center for Economic Analysis of Risk (CEAR)

BT - Gambling Problems in the General Danish Population

PB - CEAR, Georgia State University

CY - Atlanta, GA

ER -

Harrison GW, Jessen LJ, Lau M, Ross D. Gambling Problems in the General Danish Population: Survey Evidence. Atlanta, GA: CEAR, Georgia State University. 2016.