Flexicurity, the Crisis & Young

Mark Smith, Janine Leschke, Paola Villa

    Publikation: Working paperForskningpeer review

    Resumé

    ‘Flexicurity’ is a controversial concept but at the core is the delicate balancing act between matching labourmarket security and flexibility. Labour market flexibility is usually captured by contractual flexibility but canalso relate to internal flexibility through adaptation of working time. On the security side there is i) jobsecurity’ commonly measured through the strictness of employment protection legislation (EPL) ii)employment security provided by active labour market policies or life-long learning and iii) income or socialsecurity. In recent years European countries have seen a trend from job security to employment securitywith limited focus on social security. The challenge of matching security and flexibility is key to youngpeople’s effective and sustainable integration in the labour market. As such policies labelled as ‘flexicurity’have, in principle, much to offer young people. However, the implementation of flexibility and securitypolicies have tilted towards flexibility, with heightened risks for young people starting work on flexiblecontracts.This project conducted a comprehensive exploration of policy and outcomes on the flexibility-securityinterface for young people. Firstly, we identified the institutional configurations and related outcomes foryoung people across EU countries. Secondly, we assessed the early labour market experiences of youthwith a specific focus on the quality of their employment and the impact of the parental household. Thirdly,we analysed the impact of configurations of “flexicurity” policies on young people’s objective andsubjective insecurity and their well-being. Finally, we explored developments in employment policy makingbefore, during and after the crisis with a particular focus on ‘flexicurity’ and youth.
    ‘Flexicurity’ is a controversial concept but at the core is the delicate balancing act between matching labourmarket security and flexibility. Labour market flexibility is usually captured by contractual flexibility but canalso relate to internal flexibility through adaptation of working time. On the security side there is i) jobsecurity’ commonly measured through the strictness of employment protection legislation (EPL) ii)employment security provided by active labour market policies or life-long learning and iii) income or socialsecurity. In recent years European countries have seen a trend from job security to employment securitywith limited focus on social security. The challenge of matching security and flexibility is key to youngpeople’s effective and sustainable integration in the labour market. As such policies labelled as ‘flexicurity’have, in principle, much to offer young people. However, the implementation of flexibility and securitypolicies have tilted towards flexibility, with heightened risks for young people starting work on flexiblecontracts.This project conducted a comprehensive exploration of policy and outcomes on the flexibility-securityinterface for young people. Firstly, we identified the institutional configurations and related outcomes foryoung people across EU countries. Secondly, we assessed the early labour market experiences of youthwith a specific focus on the quality of their employment and the impact of the parental household. Thirdly,we analysed the impact of configurations of “flexicurity” policies on young people’s objective andsubjective insecurity and their well-being. Finally, we explored developments in employment policy makingbefore, during and after the crisis with a particular focus on ‘flexicurity’ and youth.
    SprogEngelsk
    Udgivelses stedBrighton
    UdgiverSTYLE. University of Brighton
    Antal sider4
    StatusUdgivet - jan. 2017
    NavnEuropean Policy Brief
    Nummer10

    Citer dette

    Smith, M., Leschke, J., & Villa, P. (2017). Flexicurity, the Crisis & Young. Brighton: STYLE. University of Brighton. European Policy Brief, Nr. 10
    Smith, Mark ; Leschke, Janine ; Villa, Paola. / Flexicurity, the Crisis & Young. Brighton : STYLE. University of Brighton, 2017. (European Policy Brief; Nr. 10).
    @techreport{b6a493accd15464da0a6ec402c09649f,
    title = "Flexicurity, the Crisis & Young",
    abstract = "‘Flexicurity’ is a controversial concept but at the core is the delicate balancing act between matching labourmarket security and flexibility. Labour market flexibility is usually captured by contractual flexibility but canalso relate to internal flexibility through adaptation of working time. On the security side there is i) jobsecurity’ commonly measured through the strictness of employment protection legislation (EPL) ii)employment security provided by active labour market policies or life-long learning and iii) income or socialsecurity. In recent years European countries have seen a trend from job security to employment securitywith limited focus on social security. The challenge of matching security and flexibility is key to youngpeople’s effective and sustainable integration in the labour market. As such policies labelled as ‘flexicurity’have, in principle, much to offer young people. However, the implementation of flexibility and securitypolicies have tilted towards flexibility, with heightened risks for young people starting work on flexiblecontracts.This project conducted a comprehensive exploration of policy and outcomes on the flexibility-securityinterface for young people. Firstly, we identified the institutional configurations and related outcomes foryoung people across EU countries. Secondly, we assessed the early labour market experiences of youthwith a specific focus on the quality of their employment and the impact of the parental household. Thirdly,we analysed the impact of configurations of “flexicurity” policies on young people’s objective andsubjective insecurity and their well-being. Finally, we explored developments in employment policy makingbefore, during and after the crisis with a particular focus on ‘flexicurity’ and youth.",
    author = "Mark Smith and Janine Leschke and Paola Villa",
    year = "2017",
    month = "1",
    language = "English",
    publisher = "STYLE. University of Brighton",
    address = "United Kingdom",
    type = "WorkingPaper",
    institution = "STYLE. University of Brighton",

    }

    Smith, M, Leschke, J & Villa, P 2017 'Flexicurity, the Crisis & Young' STYLE. University of Brighton, Brighton.

    Flexicurity, the Crisis & Young. / Smith, Mark; Leschke, Janine; Villa, Paola.

    Brighton : STYLE. University of Brighton, 2017.

    Publikation: Working paperForskningpeer review

    TY - UNPB

    T1 - Flexicurity, the Crisis & Young

    AU - Smith,Mark

    AU - Leschke,Janine

    AU - Villa,Paola

    PY - 2017/1

    Y1 - 2017/1

    N2 - ‘Flexicurity’ is a controversial concept but at the core is the delicate balancing act between matching labourmarket security and flexibility. Labour market flexibility is usually captured by contractual flexibility but canalso relate to internal flexibility through adaptation of working time. On the security side there is i) jobsecurity’ commonly measured through the strictness of employment protection legislation (EPL) ii)employment security provided by active labour market policies or life-long learning and iii) income or socialsecurity. In recent years European countries have seen a trend from job security to employment securitywith limited focus on social security. The challenge of matching security and flexibility is key to youngpeople’s effective and sustainable integration in the labour market. As such policies labelled as ‘flexicurity’have, in principle, much to offer young people. However, the implementation of flexibility and securitypolicies have tilted towards flexibility, with heightened risks for young people starting work on flexiblecontracts.This project conducted a comprehensive exploration of policy and outcomes on the flexibility-securityinterface for young people. Firstly, we identified the institutional configurations and related outcomes foryoung people across EU countries. Secondly, we assessed the early labour market experiences of youthwith a specific focus on the quality of their employment and the impact of the parental household. Thirdly,we analysed the impact of configurations of “flexicurity” policies on young people’s objective andsubjective insecurity and their well-being. Finally, we explored developments in employment policy makingbefore, during and after the crisis with a particular focus on ‘flexicurity’ and youth.

    AB - ‘Flexicurity’ is a controversial concept but at the core is the delicate balancing act between matching labourmarket security and flexibility. Labour market flexibility is usually captured by contractual flexibility but canalso relate to internal flexibility through adaptation of working time. On the security side there is i) jobsecurity’ commonly measured through the strictness of employment protection legislation (EPL) ii)employment security provided by active labour market policies or life-long learning and iii) income or socialsecurity. In recent years European countries have seen a trend from job security to employment securitywith limited focus on social security. The challenge of matching security and flexibility is key to youngpeople’s effective and sustainable integration in the labour market. As such policies labelled as ‘flexicurity’have, in principle, much to offer young people. However, the implementation of flexibility and securitypolicies have tilted towards flexibility, with heightened risks for young people starting work on flexiblecontracts.This project conducted a comprehensive exploration of policy and outcomes on the flexibility-securityinterface for young people. Firstly, we identified the institutional configurations and related outcomes foryoung people across EU countries. Secondly, we assessed the early labour market experiences of youthwith a specific focus on the quality of their employment and the impact of the parental household. Thirdly,we analysed the impact of configurations of “flexicurity” policies on young people’s objective andsubjective insecurity and their well-being. Finally, we explored developments in employment policy makingbefore, during and after the crisis with a particular focus on ‘flexicurity’ and youth.

    M3 - Working paper

    BT - Flexicurity, the Crisis & Young

    PB - STYLE. University of Brighton

    CY - Brighton

    ER -

    Smith M, Leschke J, Villa P. Flexicurity, the Crisis & Young. Brighton: STYLE. University of Brighton. 2017 jan.