TY - JOUR
T1 - Fifty Years of Methodological Trends in JIBS
T2 - Why Future IB Research Needs More Triangulation
AU - Nielsen, Bo Bernhard
AU - Welch, Catherine
AU - Chidlow, Agnieszka
AU - Robert Miller, Stewart
AU - Aguzzoli, Roberta
AU - Gardner, Emma
AU - Karafyllia, Maria
AU - Pegoraro, Diletta
N1 - Published online: 26. October 2020.
PY - 2020/12
Y1 - 2020/12
N2 - We analyze methodological trends in empirical research in JIBS from 1970 to 2019. Our results point to the prevalence of the following patterns: there has been an increase in the use of (1) large-scale longitudinal, cross-national datasets, (2) complex analytical techniques, including the incorporation of multiple analytical techniques within the same study, but (3) a decline in the diversity of methods in use. We relate these trends to the underlying social, technical, and communicative conventions in the journal during the 50-year period. The observed patterns are consistent with theory that posits scientific fields entrench a dominant paradigm over time, resulting in a restricted set of methodological options being selected. Such restrictions jeopardize the quality of research because the study of any phenomenon requires the use of multiple methodological procedures to avoid the systematic biases, errors, omissions, and limitations introduced by any single option. Therefore, we propose the use of triangulation as a strategy for building methodological alternatives into research designs. Institutionalization of this principle in the field of international business has the potential to enhance both the rigor and scope of future inquiry.
AB - We analyze methodological trends in empirical research in JIBS from 1970 to 2019. Our results point to the prevalence of the following patterns: there has been an increase in the use of (1) large-scale longitudinal, cross-national datasets, (2) complex analytical techniques, including the incorporation of multiple analytical techniques within the same study, but (3) a decline in the diversity of methods in use. We relate these trends to the underlying social, technical, and communicative conventions in the journal during the 50-year period. The observed patterns are consistent with theory that posits scientific fields entrench a dominant paradigm over time, resulting in a restricted set of methodological options being selected. Such restrictions jeopardize the quality of research because the study of any phenomenon requires the use of multiple methodological procedures to avoid the systematic biases, errors, omissions, and limitations introduced by any single option. Therefore, we propose the use of triangulation as a strategy for building methodological alternatives into research designs. Institutionalization of this principle in the field of international business has the potential to enhance both the rigor and scope of future inquiry.
KW - Triangulation
KW - Methodological rigor
KW - Methods diversity
KW - Methods complexity
KW - IB paradigm
KW - Methodological bandwidth
KW - Methodological innovation
KW - Methodological trends
KW - Triangulation
KW - Methodological rigor
KW - Methods diversity
KW - Methods complexity
KW - IB paradigm
KW - Methodological bandwidth
KW - Methodological innovation
KW - Methodological trends
U2 - 10.1057/s41267-020-00372-4
DO - 10.1057/s41267-020-00372-4
M3 - Journal article
SN - 0047-2506
VL - 51
SP - 1478
EP - 1499
JO - Journal of International Business Studies
JF - Journal of International Business Studies
IS - 9
ER -