External Benchmarking and Comparison Costs: Insights from a Process of Bringing the Market inside the Firm

Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskning

Resumé

Academics and consultants have for decades advocated for the use of market information inside organizations to increase motivation by exposing employees to the competition from the market. Only scant empirical research, however, investigates the comparison problems that arise when internal performance is compared with market performance (external benchmarking). This paper examines the comparison problems that occurred in a tender process in a Danish manufacturing company. We illustrate how distorted belief mechanisms in terms of ‘wishful thinking’ and the ‘grass is always greener fallacy’ (Elster, 2007; 2010), which work without much knowledge of how suppliers calculated the prices, to a large extent were co-constructors of the comparison problems. The paper contributes by providing more insight to the construction of comparison problems in practice. Furthermore, this insight adds to extant research on social comparison, which argues that proximity, interaction and information sharing increase comparison costs. Finally, we illustrate that the comparison problems were embedded in ‘harder’ elements such as accounting regulation, formal contracts and the choice of supplier strategy. Extant research focuses on ‘soft’ relations such as sociality and identity in understanding comparison costs.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Publikationsdato2019
Antal sider43
StatusUdgivet - 2019
Begivenhed12th Workshop on Management Accounting as Social and Organizational Practice. MASOP 2019 - University of Bristol, Bristol, Storbritannien
Varighed: 25 apr. 201926 apr. 2019
Konferencens nummer: 12

Workshop

Workshop12th Workshop on Management Accounting as Social and Organizational Practice. MASOP 2019
Nummer12
LokationUniversity of Bristol
LandStorbritannien
ByBristol
Periode25/04/201926/04/2019

Bibliografisk note

CBS Bibliotek har ikke adgang til materialet

Emneord

  • Relative performance measures
  • External benchmarking
  • Comparison costs
  • Market prices
  • Transaction costs economics
  • Social comparison

Citer dette

Friis, I., Hansen, A., & Vámosi, T. S. (2019). External Benchmarking and Comparison Costs: Insights from a Process of Bringing the Market inside the Firm. Afhandling præsenteret på 12th Workshop on Management Accounting as Social and Organizational Practice. MASOP 2019, Bristol, Storbritannien.
Friis, Ivar ; Hansen, Allan ; Vámosi, Tamás S. / External Benchmarking and Comparison Costs : Insights from a Process of Bringing the Market inside the Firm. Afhandling præsenteret på 12th Workshop on Management Accounting as Social and Organizational Practice. MASOP 2019, Bristol, Storbritannien.43 s.
@conference{f52226dae2e047299af9e68e411d38ab,
title = "External Benchmarking and Comparison Costs: Insights from a Process of Bringing the Market inside the Firm",
abstract = "Academics and consultants have for decades advocated for the use of market information inside organizations to increase motivation by exposing employees to the competition from the market. Only scant empirical research, however, investigates the comparison problems that arise when internal performance is compared with market performance (external benchmarking). This paper examines the comparison problems that occurred in a tender process in a Danish manufacturing company. We illustrate how distorted belief mechanisms in terms of ‘wishful thinking’ and the ‘grass is always greener fallacy’ (Elster, 2007; 2010), which work without much knowledge of how suppliers calculated the prices, to a large extent were co-constructors of the comparison problems. The paper contributes by providing more insight to the construction of comparison problems in practice. Furthermore, this insight adds to extant research on social comparison, which argues that proximity, interaction and information sharing increase comparison costs. Finally, we illustrate that the comparison problems were embedded in ‘harder’ elements such as accounting regulation, formal contracts and the choice of supplier strategy. Extant research focuses on ‘soft’ relations such as sociality and identity in understanding comparison costs.",
keywords = "Relative performance measures, External benchmarking, Comparison costs, Market prices, Transaction costs economics, Social comparison, Relative performance measures, External benchmarking, Comparison costs, Market prices, Transaction costs economics, Social comparison",
author = "Ivar Friis and Allan Hansen and V{\'a}mosi, {Tam{\'a}s S.}",
note = "CBS Library does not have access to the material; null ; Conference date: 25-04-2019 Through 26-04-2019",
year = "2019",
language = "English",

}

Friis, I, Hansen, A & Vámosi, TS 2019, 'External Benchmarking and Comparison Costs: Insights from a Process of Bringing the Market inside the Firm' Paper fremlagt ved 12th Workshop on Management Accounting as Social and Organizational Practice. MASOP 2019, Bristol, Storbritannien, 25/04/2019 - 26/04/2019, .

External Benchmarking and Comparison Costs : Insights from a Process of Bringing the Market inside the Firm. / Friis, Ivar; Hansen, Allan; Vámosi, Tamás S.

2019. Afhandling præsenteret på 12th Workshop on Management Accounting as Social and Organizational Practice. MASOP 2019, Bristol, Storbritannien.

Publikation: KonferencebidragPaperForskning

TY - CONF

T1 - External Benchmarking and Comparison Costs

T2 - Insights from a Process of Bringing the Market inside the Firm

AU - Friis, Ivar

AU - Hansen, Allan

AU - Vámosi, Tamás S.

N1 - CBS Library does not have access to the material

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Academics and consultants have for decades advocated for the use of market information inside organizations to increase motivation by exposing employees to the competition from the market. Only scant empirical research, however, investigates the comparison problems that arise when internal performance is compared with market performance (external benchmarking). This paper examines the comparison problems that occurred in a tender process in a Danish manufacturing company. We illustrate how distorted belief mechanisms in terms of ‘wishful thinking’ and the ‘grass is always greener fallacy’ (Elster, 2007; 2010), which work without much knowledge of how suppliers calculated the prices, to a large extent were co-constructors of the comparison problems. The paper contributes by providing more insight to the construction of comparison problems in practice. Furthermore, this insight adds to extant research on social comparison, which argues that proximity, interaction and information sharing increase comparison costs. Finally, we illustrate that the comparison problems were embedded in ‘harder’ elements such as accounting regulation, formal contracts and the choice of supplier strategy. Extant research focuses on ‘soft’ relations such as sociality and identity in understanding comparison costs.

AB - Academics and consultants have for decades advocated for the use of market information inside organizations to increase motivation by exposing employees to the competition from the market. Only scant empirical research, however, investigates the comparison problems that arise when internal performance is compared with market performance (external benchmarking). This paper examines the comparison problems that occurred in a tender process in a Danish manufacturing company. We illustrate how distorted belief mechanisms in terms of ‘wishful thinking’ and the ‘grass is always greener fallacy’ (Elster, 2007; 2010), which work without much knowledge of how suppliers calculated the prices, to a large extent were co-constructors of the comparison problems. The paper contributes by providing more insight to the construction of comparison problems in practice. Furthermore, this insight adds to extant research on social comparison, which argues that proximity, interaction and information sharing increase comparison costs. Finally, we illustrate that the comparison problems were embedded in ‘harder’ elements such as accounting regulation, formal contracts and the choice of supplier strategy. Extant research focuses on ‘soft’ relations such as sociality and identity in understanding comparison costs.

KW - Relative performance measures

KW - External benchmarking

KW - Comparison costs

KW - Market prices

KW - Transaction costs economics

KW - Social comparison

KW - Relative performance measures

KW - External benchmarking

KW - Comparison costs

KW - Market prices

KW - Transaction costs economics

KW - Social comparison

M3 - Paper

ER -

Friis I, Hansen A, Vámosi TS. External Benchmarking and Comparison Costs: Insights from a Process of Bringing the Market inside the Firm. 2019. Afhandling præsenteret på 12th Workshop on Management Accounting as Social and Organizational Practice. MASOP 2019, Bristol, Storbritannien.