Exploring Resistance in Collaborative Forms of Governance: Meaning Negotiations and Counter-narratives in a Case from the Danish Education Sector

Mie Plotnikof*, Anne Reff Pedersen

*Kontaktforfatter af dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

This paper addresses resistance in studies about collaborative forms of governance. Although the literaturediscusses collaborative challenges, issues related to resistance are largely unexplored and mostly regarded asdestructive. However, we argue for understanding resistance more dynamically–as a co-constructive aspect ofcollaboration. Drawing on extant resistance studies, we combine concepts of meaning negotiation and counter-narrative to examine power-resistance relations in a case study of collaborative forms of governance in theDanish education sector. Thefindings elucidate how resistance complicates, yet also co-constructs collaborationin governance processes; discursive struggles over meanings of collaboration and a quality model invoke power-resistance relations that destabilize a dominant narrative and enable counter-narratives, which influence futurecollaborative processes. Hence, we suggest understanding resistance as a constitutive feature in collaborativeforms of governance, rather than a destructive obstacle. This contributes with empirical and theoretical insightsinto the complex role of resistance in collaboration and governance processes.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer101061
TidsskriftScandinavian Journal of Management
Vol/bind35
Udgave nummer4
Antal sider11
ISSN0956-5221
DOI
StatusUdgivet - dec. 2019

Emneord

  • Resistance
  • Meaning negotiation
  • Counter-narrative
  • Organizational discourse
  • Collaborative governance
  • Education sector

Citer dette

@article{fc326233fe314e118138bcdac5ab53fb,
title = "Exploring Resistance in Collaborative Forms of Governance: Meaning Negotiations and Counter-narratives in a Case from the Danish Education Sector",
abstract = "This paper addresses resistance in studies about collaborative forms of governance. Although the literature discusses collaborative challenges, issues related to resistance are largely unexplored and mostly regarded as destructive. However, we argue for understanding resistance more dynamically – as a co-constructive aspect of collaboration. Drawing on extant resistance studies, we combine concepts of meaning negotiation and counter-narrative to examine power-resistance relations in a case study of collaborative forms of governance in the Danish education sector. The findings elucidate how resistance complicates, yet also co-constructs collaboration in governance processes; discursive struggles over meanings of collaboration and a quality model invoke power-resistance relations that destabilize a dominant narrative and enable counter-narratives, which influence future collaborative processes. Hence, we suggest understanding resistance as a constitutive feature in collaborative forms of governance, rather than a destructive obstacle. This contributes with empirical and theoretical insights into the complex role of resistance in collaboration and governance processes.",
keywords = "Collaborative governance, Counter-narrative, Education sector, Meaning negotiation, Organizational discourse, Resistance, Resistance, Meaning negotiation, Counter-narrative, Organizational discourse, Collaborative governance, Education sector",
author = "Mie Plotnikof and Pedersen, {Anne Reff}",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.scaman.2019.101061",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
journal = "Scandinavian Journal of Management",
issn = "0956-5221",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",
number = "4",

}

Exploring Resistance in Collaborative Forms of Governance : Meaning Negotiations and Counter-narratives in a Case from the Danish Education Sector. / Plotnikof, Mie; Pedersen, Anne Reff.

I: Scandinavian Journal of Management, Bind 35, Nr. 4, 101061, 12.2019.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring Resistance in Collaborative Forms of Governance

T2 - Meaning Negotiations and Counter-narratives in a Case from the Danish Education Sector

AU - Plotnikof, Mie

AU - Pedersen, Anne Reff

PY - 2019/12

Y1 - 2019/12

N2 - This paper addresses resistance in studies about collaborative forms of governance. Although the literature discusses collaborative challenges, issues related to resistance are largely unexplored and mostly regarded as destructive. However, we argue for understanding resistance more dynamically – as a co-constructive aspect of collaboration. Drawing on extant resistance studies, we combine concepts of meaning negotiation and counter-narrative to examine power-resistance relations in a case study of collaborative forms of governance in the Danish education sector. The findings elucidate how resistance complicates, yet also co-constructs collaboration in governance processes; discursive struggles over meanings of collaboration and a quality model invoke power-resistance relations that destabilize a dominant narrative and enable counter-narratives, which influence future collaborative processes. Hence, we suggest understanding resistance as a constitutive feature in collaborative forms of governance, rather than a destructive obstacle. This contributes with empirical and theoretical insights into the complex role of resistance in collaboration and governance processes.

AB - This paper addresses resistance in studies about collaborative forms of governance. Although the literature discusses collaborative challenges, issues related to resistance are largely unexplored and mostly regarded as destructive. However, we argue for understanding resistance more dynamically – as a co-constructive aspect of collaboration. Drawing on extant resistance studies, we combine concepts of meaning negotiation and counter-narrative to examine power-resistance relations in a case study of collaborative forms of governance in the Danish education sector. The findings elucidate how resistance complicates, yet also co-constructs collaboration in governance processes; discursive struggles over meanings of collaboration and a quality model invoke power-resistance relations that destabilize a dominant narrative and enable counter-narratives, which influence future collaborative processes. Hence, we suggest understanding resistance as a constitutive feature in collaborative forms of governance, rather than a destructive obstacle. This contributes with empirical and theoretical insights into the complex role of resistance in collaboration and governance processes.

KW - Collaborative governance

KW - Counter-narrative

KW - Education sector

KW - Meaning negotiation

KW - Organizational discourse

KW - Resistance

KW - Resistance

KW - Meaning negotiation

KW - Counter-narrative

KW - Organizational discourse

KW - Collaborative governance

KW - Education sector

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954926243505&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1016/j.scaman.2019.101061

DO - 10.1016/j.scaman.2019.101061

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85070271138

VL - 35

JO - Scandinavian Journal of Management

JF - Scandinavian Journal of Management

SN - 0956-5221

IS - 4

M1 - 101061

ER -