Exclusion and Inclusion in the Danish Military: A Historical Analysis of the Construction and Consequences of a Gendered Organizational Narrative

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

66 Downloads (Pure)

Resumé

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine why and how past stories of women’s insufficiency for military work survive and how they come to form a gendered organizational narrative dominant in constructing current opinions on women in the military.
Design/methodology/approach: The analysis is based mainly on archival data, but supported by interview material as well as participant observation data. The authors do this from the assumption that the culturally constructed notion of the ideal soldier is based on a historically constructed professional narrative.
Findings: The authors show how a historically produced gender narrative – based on (fictional) stories on what women can and cannot do – is perceived as true and thereby casts women as less suitable for a military career. Thus, despite the current equal legal rights of men and women in the military, the power of the narrative limits female soldiers’ career possibilities.
Originality/value: The paper is unique as it, in drawing on archival data, is able to trace how an organizational narrative comes to be and due to its ethnographic data how this creates limitations for women’s careers. This narrative is stronger and much more powerful than management is aware of. The paper therefore adds crucial knowledge about the ideological influence a historically produced organizational narrative can have on current change initiatives.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Organizational Change Management
Vol/bind30
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)367-379
Antal sider13
ISSN0953-4814
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2017

Emneord

  • Inclusion
  • Military
  • Exclusion
  • Diversity change programmes
  • Gender narrative
  • Historical analysis

Citer dette

@article{94adbfe7dce44556a7b5b231ea92564a,
title = "Exclusion and Inclusion in the Danish Military: A Historical Analysis of the Construction and Consequences of a Gendered Organizational Narrative",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine why and how past stories of women’s insufficiency for military work survive and how they come to form a gendered organizational narrative dominant in constructing current opinions on women in the military.Design/methodology/approach: The analysis is based mainly on archival data, but supported by interview material as well as participant observation data. The authors do this from the assumption that the culturally constructed notion of the ideal soldier is based on a historically constructed professional narrative.Findings: The authors show how a historically produced gender narrative – based on (fictional) stories on what women can and cannot do – is perceived as true and thereby casts women as less suitable for a military career. Thus, despite the current equal legal rights of men and women in the military, the power of the narrative limits female soldiers’ career possibilities.Originality/value: The paper is unique as it, in drawing on archival data, is able to trace how an organizational narrative comes to be and due to its ethnographic data how this creates limitations for women’s careers. This narrative is stronger and much more powerful than management is aware of. The paper therefore adds crucial knowledge about the ideological influence a historically produced organizational narrative can have on current change initiatives.",
keywords = "Inclusion, Military, Exclusion, Diversity change programmes, Gender narrative, Historical analysis, Inclusion, Military, Exclusion, Diversity change programmes, Gender narrative",
author = "Muhr, {Sara Louise} and Beate Sl{\o}k-Andersen",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1108/JOCM-10-2016-0195",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "367--379",
journal = "Journal of Organizational Change Management",
issn = "0953-4814",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exclusion and Inclusion in the Danish Military

T2 - A Historical Analysis of the Construction and Consequences of a Gendered Organizational Narrative

AU - Muhr, Sara Louise

AU - Sløk-Andersen, Beate

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine why and how past stories of women’s insufficiency for military work survive and how they come to form a gendered organizational narrative dominant in constructing current opinions on women in the military.Design/methodology/approach: The analysis is based mainly on archival data, but supported by interview material as well as participant observation data. The authors do this from the assumption that the culturally constructed notion of the ideal soldier is based on a historically constructed professional narrative.Findings: The authors show how a historically produced gender narrative – based on (fictional) stories on what women can and cannot do – is perceived as true and thereby casts women as less suitable for a military career. Thus, despite the current equal legal rights of men and women in the military, the power of the narrative limits female soldiers’ career possibilities.Originality/value: The paper is unique as it, in drawing on archival data, is able to trace how an organizational narrative comes to be and due to its ethnographic data how this creates limitations for women’s careers. This narrative is stronger and much more powerful than management is aware of. The paper therefore adds crucial knowledge about the ideological influence a historically produced organizational narrative can have on current change initiatives.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine why and how past stories of women’s insufficiency for military work survive and how they come to form a gendered organizational narrative dominant in constructing current opinions on women in the military.Design/methodology/approach: The analysis is based mainly on archival data, but supported by interview material as well as participant observation data. The authors do this from the assumption that the culturally constructed notion of the ideal soldier is based on a historically constructed professional narrative.Findings: The authors show how a historically produced gender narrative – based on (fictional) stories on what women can and cannot do – is perceived as true and thereby casts women as less suitable for a military career. Thus, despite the current equal legal rights of men and women in the military, the power of the narrative limits female soldiers’ career possibilities.Originality/value: The paper is unique as it, in drawing on archival data, is able to trace how an organizational narrative comes to be and due to its ethnographic data how this creates limitations for women’s careers. This narrative is stronger and much more powerful than management is aware of. The paper therefore adds crucial knowledge about the ideological influence a historically produced organizational narrative can have on current change initiatives.

KW - Inclusion

KW - Military

KW - Exclusion

KW - Diversity change programmes

KW - Gender narrative

KW - Historical analysis

KW - Inclusion

KW - Military

KW - Exclusion

KW - Diversity change programmes

KW - Gender narrative

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921412368

U2 - 10.1108/JOCM-10-2016-0195

DO - 10.1108/JOCM-10-2016-0195

M3 - Journal article

VL - 30

SP - 367

EP - 379

JO - Journal of Organizational Change Management

JF - Journal of Organizational Change Management

SN - 0953-4814

IS - 3

ER -