Errors, Lies and Misunderstandings: Systematic Review on Behavioural Decision Making in Projects

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

This paper provides a systematic review of the literature on behavioural decision making in projects. The field is blooming, and given the relevance of decisions in projects and the strong theoretical foundations of behavioural decision making, it offers to contribute to practice and theory in projects and beyond. However, the literature is fragmented and draws only on a fraction of the recent, insightful, and relevant developments on behavioural decision making. This paper organises current research in a conceptual framework rooted in three schools of thinking – reductionist (on cognitive limitations - errors), pluralist (on political behaviour - lies), and contextualist (on social and organisational sensemaking - misunderstandings). Our review suggests avenues for future research with a wider coverage of theories in cognitive and social psychology and critical and mindful integration of findings and concepts across three schools.
This paper provides a systematic review of the literature on behavioural decision making in projects. The field is blooming, and given the relevance of decisions in projects and the strong theoretical foundations of behavioural decision making, it offers to contribute to practice and theory in projects and beyond. However, the literature is fragmented and draws only on a fraction of the recent, insightful, and relevant developments on behavioural decision making. This paper organises current research in a conceptual framework rooted in three schools of thinking – reductionist (on cognitive limitations - errors), pluralist (on political behaviour - lies), and contextualist (on social and organisational sensemaking - misunderstandings). Our review suggests avenues for future research with a wider coverage of theories in cognitive and social psychology and critical and mindful integration of findings and concepts across three schools.
SprogEngelsk
TidsskriftInternational Journal of Project Management
Vol/bind35
Udgave nummer2
Sider121-135
Antal sider15
ISSN0263-7863
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2017
Udgivet eksterntJa

Emneord

  • Decision making
  • Behavioural decision making
  • Cognition
  • Sensemaking
  • Systematic review
  • Project studies

Citer dette

@article{83d5cbad0d224c918f77c5e13fc0a037,
title = "Errors, Lies and Misunderstandings: Systematic Review on Behavioural Decision Making in Projects",
abstract = "This paper provides a systematic review of the literature on behavioural decision making in projects. The field is blooming, and given the relevance of decisions in projects and the strong theoretical foundations of behavioural decision making, it offers to contribute to practice and theory in projects and beyond. However, the literature is fragmented and draws only on a fraction of the recent, insightful, and relevant developments on behavioural decision making. This paper organises current research in a conceptual framework rooted in three schools of thinking – reductionist (on cognitive limitations - errors), pluralist (on political behaviour - lies), and contextualist (on social and organisational sensemaking - misunderstandings). Our review suggests avenues for future research with a wider coverage of theories in cognitive and social psychology and critical and mindful integration of findings and concepts across three schools.",
keywords = "Decision making, Behavioural decision making, Cognition, Sensemaking, Systematic review, Project studies, Decision making, Behavioural decision making, Cognition, Sensemaking, Systematic review, Project studies",
author = "Verena Stingl and Joana Geraldi",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.10.009",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "121--135",
journal = "International Journal of Project Management",
issn = "0263-7863",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",
number = "2",

}

Errors, Lies and Misunderstandings : Systematic Review on Behavioural Decision Making in Projects. / Stingl, Verena; Geraldi, Joana .

I: International Journal of Project Management, Bind 35, Nr. 2, 2017, s. 121-135.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Errors, Lies and Misunderstandings

T2 - International Journal of Project Management

AU - Stingl,Verena

AU - Geraldi,Joana

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - This paper provides a systematic review of the literature on behavioural decision making in projects. The field is blooming, and given the relevance of decisions in projects and the strong theoretical foundations of behavioural decision making, it offers to contribute to practice and theory in projects and beyond. However, the literature is fragmented and draws only on a fraction of the recent, insightful, and relevant developments on behavioural decision making. This paper organises current research in a conceptual framework rooted in three schools of thinking – reductionist (on cognitive limitations - errors), pluralist (on political behaviour - lies), and contextualist (on social and organisational sensemaking - misunderstandings). Our review suggests avenues for future research with a wider coverage of theories in cognitive and social psychology and critical and mindful integration of findings and concepts across three schools.

AB - This paper provides a systematic review of the literature on behavioural decision making in projects. The field is blooming, and given the relevance of decisions in projects and the strong theoretical foundations of behavioural decision making, it offers to contribute to practice and theory in projects and beyond. However, the literature is fragmented and draws only on a fraction of the recent, insightful, and relevant developments on behavioural decision making. This paper organises current research in a conceptual framework rooted in three schools of thinking – reductionist (on cognitive limitations - errors), pluralist (on political behaviour - lies), and contextualist (on social and organisational sensemaking - misunderstandings). Our review suggests avenues for future research with a wider coverage of theories in cognitive and social psychology and critical and mindful integration of findings and concepts across three schools.

KW - Decision making

KW - Behavioural decision making

KW - Cognition

KW - Sensemaking

KW - Systematic review

KW - Project studies

KW - Decision making

KW - Behavioural decision making

KW - Cognition

KW - Sensemaking

KW - Systematic review

KW - Project studies

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.10.009

DO - 10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.10.009

M3 - Journal article

VL - 35

SP - 121

EP - 135

JO - International Journal of Project Management

JF - International Journal of Project Management

SN - 0263-7863

IS - 2

ER -