Entrepreneur Companies Abolished in Denmark and Belgium: For Very Different Reasons and with Very Different Results

Publikation: Working paperForskningpeer review

Resumé

The article begins with a historical view on the legal development of minimum capital requirements for the private limited companies in Europe. An introduction to the historically very different approaches in Germany and England is given, and it is shown that the international trend moves towards the English regime where creditor protection largely rests on the responsibility of company members or management towards the company and its creditors. The Belgian entrepreneur company (SPRL-starter) and the Danish entrepreneur company (IVS) were introduced in 2010 and 2014, respectively. In both countries, they were introduced to avoid a boom of branches of foreign companies after the cases from ECJ, Centros, Überseering and Inspire Art. In April 2019, the opportunity to establish new entrepreneur companies was abolished in Denmark, and in May 2019, the same happened in Belgium. Even though it could indicate that the legal development in the two countries were alike, nothing could be more misleading. While Belgium followed the international trend and in reality abolished the minimum capital requirement for private limited companies, Denmark just abolished the IVS, while no real alternative to branches of foreign companies was introduced, leaving Denmark with the second highest minimum capital requirement in Europe, with a receding number of new businesses. At the same time, it leaves Denmark in the danger zone of having an invasion of branches of foreign low capital companies, with Danish entrepreneurs as shareholders.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Udgave19-43
Antal sider13
StatusUdgivet - 2019
NavnCopenhagen Business School Law Research Paper Series

Bibliografisk note

CBS Bibliotek har ikke adgang til materialet

Emneord

  • Company law
  • Entrepreneur company
  • Danish law
  • Belgian law
  • Creditor protection

Citer dette

@techreport{618edf21cc2f4e95abe0ff1f0c610379,
title = "Entrepreneur Companies Abolished in Denmark and Belgium: For Very Different Reasons and with Very Different Results",
abstract = "The article begins with a historical view on the legal development of minimum capital requirements for the private limited companies in Europe. An introduction to the historically very different approaches in Germany and England is given, and it is shown that the international trend moves towards the English regime where creditor protection largely rests on the responsibility of company members or management towards the company and its creditors. The Belgian entrepreneur company (SPRL-starter) and the Danish entrepreneur company (IVS) were introduced in 2010 and 2014, respectively. In both countries, they were introduced to avoid a boom of branches of foreign companies after the cases from ECJ, Centros, {\"U}berseering and Inspire Art. In April 2019, the opportunity to establish new entrepreneur companies was abolished in Denmark, and in May 2019, the same happened in Belgium. Even though it could indicate that the legal development in the two countries were alike, nothing could be more misleading. While Belgium followed the international trend and in reality abolished the minimum capital requirement for private limited companies, Denmark just abolished the IVS, while no real alternative to branches of foreign companies was introduced, leaving Denmark with the second highest minimum capital requirement in Europe, with a receding number of new businesses. At the same time, it leaves Denmark in the danger zone of having an invasion of branches of foreign low capital companies, with Danish entrepreneurs as shareholders.",
keywords = "Company law, Entrepreneur company, Danish law, Belgian law, Creditor protection, Company law, Entrepreneur company, Danish law, Belgian law, Creditor protection",
author = "Lilja, {Troels Michael}",
note = "CBS Library does not have access to the material",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
series = "Copenhagen Business School Law Research Paper Series",
publisher = "CBS LAW. Copenhagen Business School",
edition = "19-43",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "CBS LAW. Copenhagen Business School",

}

TY - UNPB

T1 - Entrepreneur Companies Abolished in Denmark and Belgium

T2 - For Very Different Reasons and with Very Different Results

AU - Lilja, Troels Michael

N1 - CBS Library does not have access to the material

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - The article begins with a historical view on the legal development of minimum capital requirements for the private limited companies in Europe. An introduction to the historically very different approaches in Germany and England is given, and it is shown that the international trend moves towards the English regime where creditor protection largely rests on the responsibility of company members or management towards the company and its creditors. The Belgian entrepreneur company (SPRL-starter) and the Danish entrepreneur company (IVS) were introduced in 2010 and 2014, respectively. In both countries, they were introduced to avoid a boom of branches of foreign companies after the cases from ECJ, Centros, Überseering and Inspire Art. In April 2019, the opportunity to establish new entrepreneur companies was abolished in Denmark, and in May 2019, the same happened in Belgium. Even though it could indicate that the legal development in the two countries were alike, nothing could be more misleading. While Belgium followed the international trend and in reality abolished the minimum capital requirement for private limited companies, Denmark just abolished the IVS, while no real alternative to branches of foreign companies was introduced, leaving Denmark with the second highest minimum capital requirement in Europe, with a receding number of new businesses. At the same time, it leaves Denmark in the danger zone of having an invasion of branches of foreign low capital companies, with Danish entrepreneurs as shareholders.

AB - The article begins with a historical view on the legal development of minimum capital requirements for the private limited companies in Europe. An introduction to the historically very different approaches in Germany and England is given, and it is shown that the international trend moves towards the English regime where creditor protection largely rests on the responsibility of company members or management towards the company and its creditors. The Belgian entrepreneur company (SPRL-starter) and the Danish entrepreneur company (IVS) were introduced in 2010 and 2014, respectively. In both countries, they were introduced to avoid a boom of branches of foreign companies after the cases from ECJ, Centros, Überseering and Inspire Art. In April 2019, the opportunity to establish new entrepreneur companies was abolished in Denmark, and in May 2019, the same happened in Belgium. Even though it could indicate that the legal development in the two countries were alike, nothing could be more misleading. While Belgium followed the international trend and in reality abolished the minimum capital requirement for private limited companies, Denmark just abolished the IVS, while no real alternative to branches of foreign companies was introduced, leaving Denmark with the second highest minimum capital requirement in Europe, with a receding number of new businesses. At the same time, it leaves Denmark in the danger zone of having an invasion of branches of foreign low capital companies, with Danish entrepreneurs as shareholders.

KW - Company law

KW - Entrepreneur company

KW - Danish law

KW - Belgian law

KW - Creditor protection

KW - Company law

KW - Entrepreneur company

KW - Danish law

KW - Belgian law

KW - Creditor protection

M3 - Working paper

T3 - Copenhagen Business School Law Research Paper Series

BT - Entrepreneur Companies Abolished in Denmark and Belgium

ER -